Despite having recorded episode 04 talking insurance, at the time we spoke no one could have imagined that a containership would strike and destroy bridge, essentially shutting off an entier port from commerce.

Yet that is what happened when the Dali struck a support pillar of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, taking down the bridge and causing loss of life and billions of dollars in damage for cleanup and new bridge construction.

One week on from the accident, the the investigation process is well underway and federal agencies are working around the clock to safely and quickly re-open the port of Baltimore, the 11th largest port in the United States and the largest port of entry for automobiles, light trucks and operates strong bulk and cruise business that is inaccessible with the closure.

The first legal actions are also being filed, including by the vessel's owner to limit their liability. President Biden promised the US goverment will rebuild the bridge, and they likely will. What undergirds that claim is a complex insurance industry infrastructure that will distribute the loss across multiple entities and ensure that the government and valid claimants are paid.

We asked Philip Bilney to rejoin us - an unusual thing to do after recording once already, but he was kind enough to share his time and contribute his thoughts and insights.

If a butterfly flaps its wings in Asia, a wave crashes against the coastal United States some period of time later, or so the adage goes. Since the attack in Israel last October, besides what is transpiring inside of Gaza, all eyes have been on the Red Sea. The Houthi rebels, whose history in Yemen goes back much further than most people are aware, have made targeting shipping interests a means to gain the world's attention.

The Houthis have said that the attacks on ships and seafarers will continue until such time as there is a cease fire. Most recently, the crew of a UK-flagged vessel was forced to abandon ship after one such attack. Despite the US and other nations' response to the killing of three American servicemembers, the attacks continue. Without getting overtly political, there is a belief that these attacks are being aided by Iran using an intelligence-gathering ship situated right smack in the middle of everything and is helping the Houthis identify potential targets.

Despite an early attempt by several carriers to pass through the area, the inability of a multilateral coalition to sufficiently ensure the safety of all commercial traffic has led carriers to circumnavigate the entirety of the African coast adding both time and cost, plus re-igniting the for-a-period dormant business model of maritime piracy near the southern tip of Africa.

The first reaction of people (and businesses) is to assume that this situation and others in the reason have immediately led to surcharges and higher insurance premiums on cargo in the region. The fact of the matter is, given the way insurance works, there really isn't a bright line from one activity or change in trading conditions to an increase in premiums. It is a much more interconnected web, in fact, that could lead to increases to cargo insurance on other trade lanes, cyber insurance policies or even personal home, auto and health insurance policies, despite the seeming lack of connection between all these coverages.

Joining Cameron and Scott for this episode is Philip Bilney, a man who intimately understands insurance. The Executive Chairman of the +8Partners ecosystem of companies, Phil has spent a lifetime in the insurance industry and markets. Knowledgeable, approachable and with the ability to easily explain complex subjects while providing the necessary background and context to undergird the explanation, Phil is one of the best people to turn to for this issue.

On January 1st, drayage carriers who service the twin ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach were faced with a new requirement that, while on its face seems to be a push towards better quality of life for workers and communities around the ports, it couldn't be more misguided.

According to the Journal of Commerce: "...California’s Advanced Clean Fleet regulation requires that effective Jan. 1, all new trucks entering over-the-road and drayage fleets must be zero-emission, with all trucks in the state needing to meet that rule by 2035. Similarly, farmers will be required to begin phasing in zero-emission off-road vehicles and tractors."

Sure, you're thinking, California already has some of the most stringent tailpipe emissions requirements in the country, and you'd be right. So why aren't those standards sufficient? The truth be told, to most reasonable people, they would be enough.

However, this isn't a discussion for reasonable people. These are policies being put forth by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, or AQMD for short.

In January, rental car company Hertz is divesting itself of nearly 20,000 electric vehicles because of the idiosyncrasies a driver has when moving away from an internal combustion engine, or ICE, vehicle. If you're already an EV owner, you're used to charging, range calculations that aren't 1:1 with the range you're told you have remaining and finding available charging in high-density markets.

Consumers are willing to accept some inconveniences in their lives but like the difference between that cheap online hand mixer and a pro, high-capacity one used in commercial bakeries, the commercial stuff is expected to work better, last longer and be less prone to mechanical failures.

The California Energy Commission estimates California needs 157,000 medium- and heavy-duty chargers — 53 a day — by 2030 to meet proposed regulations like the Advanced Clean Truck and Advanced Clean Fleet rules.

The fact is, California's ports are risking their competitiveness, they're risking the number of drivers who can service the ports and at a time when the ports are seeing volumes slightly above 2019 numbers but not near the record pandemic numbers and for shippers, there's a risk of this moving to other states.

Scope 3 emissions and the greenhouse gases generated by shipping are a legitimate environmental concern. Whether Maersk looking to methanol-fueled ships or the nascent but growing number Sustainable Aviation Fuel, or SAF, refineries coming online, solutions are being developed, but not without there being significant steps backwards in productivity that are being imposed on a community.

With the help of Matt Schrap, Executive Director of the Harbor Trucking Association, Scott and Cameron are going to have a conversation that asks and answers the questions:

1. What are the California state-level regulations?

2. What are the port level regulations and policies?

3. Will it spread north to Oakland and other CA ports which saw containerized traffic during the pandemic and might still be seeing some of that business?

4. What will happen if this goes national?

5. What are 3 takeaways / action items that logistics companies, truckers and cargo owners can do to prepare their organizations or to let their voices be heard.

And most importantly, Logistically Speaking, what are cargo owners to do about the zero-emission truck requirement?