Lee Strobel: WRONGFUL CHARGE On Man Shows How To View EVIDENCE For CHRIST'S RESURRECTION? (Debunked)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Lee Strobel: WRONGFUL CHARGE On Man Shows How To View EVIDENCE For CHRIST'S RESURRECTION? (Debunked)
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Strobel claims that he was an atheist. I am stating that I don't think Lee Strobel was an atheist at all when he conducted his interviews for his popular book, THE CASE FOR CHRIST. Lee uses an analogy from an old wrongful charge on a career criminal to show how one must be willing to be objective. However, as you will see, he fails to follow his own pointed methods that he advises in this introductory chapter. Because that is what Evangelists and other Christian fundamentalists do. They don't study the facts, they attempt to twist them to fit their own worldview.
THE SECOND FALL. For what would a Yeshua really be like in the Apocalypse? Sure to offend a few, and then maybe a few more.
https://www.amazon.com/SECOND-FALL-Charles-Hurst/dp/B08RR9SJFM
FOR THE VISUALLY MOTIVATED CLICK HERE FOR THESE EPISODES:
https://www.youtube.com/@debunkingthefundamentalist
SOURCES
STEVE CHIVES: "An Atheist Reads The Case For Christ: Conclusion."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qQ3U-YURag