• Judicial Philosophies Are Way Overrated with Mark Tushnet - Episode 192

  • 2025/03/21
  • 再生時間： 27 分
  • ポッドキャスト

Judicial Philosophies Are Way Overrated with Mark Tushnet - Episode 192

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

  • サマリー

  • Kathryn Rubino chats with Harvard Law’s Prof. Mark Tushnet, exploring his new book, “Who Am I to Judge?” Tushnet critiques the Supreme Court’s originalism and questions the narrow experience of justices. A must-listen to rethink judicial norms and hear Tushnet’s engaging perspectives on ideal court nominations and even the question of favorite books!

    Highlights

    • The genesis of a legal career: from political science to law school.
    • Critique of judicial review’s evolution since the 1970s.
    • Democrats rely on courts against the Trump administration.
    • Background of the book “Who Am I to Judge?”
    • Insight on Supreme Court composition change over generations.
    • Judges’ uniformity influencing mediocre decisions.
    • Originalism in academic vs judicial contexts.
    • Evaluating Supreme Court nominees on broader life experiences.
    • Predictions for Trump’s potential future nominees.

    Episode Sponsored By
    https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexisplus

    Links and Resources
    https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300277029/who-am-i-to-judge/

    Subscribe, Share and Review
    To get the next episode subscribe with your favorite podcast player.

    • Subscribe with Apple Podcasts
    • Follow on Spotify
    • Leave a review on Apple Podcasts
    続きを読む 一部表示

あらすじ・解説

Kathryn Rubino chats with Harvard Law’s Prof. Mark Tushnet, exploring his new book, “Who Am I to Judge?” Tushnet critiques the Supreme Court’s originalism and questions the narrow experience of justices. A must-listen to rethink judicial norms and hear Tushnet’s engaging perspectives on ideal court nominations and even the question of favorite books!

Highlights

  • The genesis of a legal career: from political science to law school.
  • Critique of judicial review’s evolution since the 1970s.
  • Democrats rely on courts against the Trump administration.
  • Background of the book “Who Am I to Judge?”
  • Insight on Supreme Court composition change over generations.
  • Judges’ uniformity influencing mediocre decisions.
  • Originalism in academic vs judicial contexts.
  • Evaluating Supreme Court nominees on broader life experiences.
  • Predictions for Trump’s potential future nominees.

Episode Sponsored By
https://www.lexisnexis.com/lexisplus

Links and Resources
https://yalebooks.yale.edu/book/9780300277029/who-am-i-to-judge/

Subscribe, Share and Review
To get the next episode subscribe with your favorite podcast player.

  • Subscribe with Apple Podcasts
  • Follow on Spotify
  • Leave a review on Apple Podcasts
続きを読む 一部表示

Judicial Philosophies Are Way Overrated with Mark Tushnet - Episode 192に寄せられたリスナーの声

カスタマーレビュー：以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

Audible.co.jp

Amazon.co.jp
レビューはまだありません。