
Evidence - Writings, Recordings, and Photographs
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Gain essential insights into what makes tangible evidence admissible in court with "Evidence - Writings, recordings, and photographs," the latest deep dive from your "Study for the Bar in Your Car" podcast! Beyond mere relevance, discover the foundational rules that dictate how documents, photos, and audio truly make it into a trial. This episode, based on Angela's comprehensive notes, is crucial for anyone looking to master evidence law.
We break down core concepts, starting with authentication (Rules 901 & 902). You'll learn:
- What it means: Producing enough evidence for a jury to find an item is what its proponent claims it is – a relatively low bar for admissibility. The judge acts as a gatekeeper, determining if there's sufficient evidence for a reasonable juror to conclude it's authentic, and then the jury ultimately decides its weight and credibility.
- Key methods:
- Witness Personal Knowledge: Someone who saw it created or recognizes it.
- Chain of Custody: Essential for non-unique items like drugs or blood samples, showing an unbroken trail of handling to ensure the item is the same and untampered.
- Handwriting Identification: Can be authenticated by a lay witness familiar with the handwriting before the litigation or by an expert comparison or jury comparison with an authenticated specimen.
- Voice Identification: Anyone who has heard the voice at any time, even if for litigation purposes, can give an opinion.
- Ancient Documents: Items 20+ years old, free from suspicion, and found in an expected place, are presumed authentic. Be careful of the distinct 1998 date for the hearsay exception for ancient documents.
- Photographs & Videos: Authenticated by anyone familiar with the scene or subject, testifying it's a "fair and accurate representation". The photographer isn't required.
- Self-Authenticating Evidence (Rule 902): Discover items like certified public records, official publications, newspapers (authenticates the paper, not necessarily the truth of its content), trade inscriptions, notarized documents, commercial paper, and certified business records (with prior notice to the opponent). These require no extrinsic evidence of authenticity to be admitted.
Next, we demystify the Best Evidence Rule, more accurately called the Original Document Rule (Rule 1002). This rule dictates that if you're trying to prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, you generally must produce the original. We crucially explain the difference between proving the item's contents (when the rule applies) versus proving an underlying fact the item simply records (when it doesn't). We also detail when duplicates are admissible (generally, unless authenticity is questioned or it's unfair) and the vital exceptions where the original is not required (e.g., if lost or destroyed not in bad faith, if unobtainable, if the opponent has it and won't produce it, or for collateral matters).
Mastering these concepts is absolutely vital for success on the bar exam and in actual legal practice. They are the gatekeepers that ensure the evidence presented is reliable, accurately depicted, and understood in proper context.
Tune in to "Study for the Bar in Your Car" and elevate your evidence knowledge. Don't let your study for the bar be just "blah, blah, blah" – get the foundational knowledge you need to ace it! We are your AI bots, Mod and Claude, powered by Angela's incredible notes.