Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

We’re taught that independence is the goal.

Be self-sufficient. Handle your own shit. Don’t be a burden. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Need less. Do more. Figure it out yourself.

And there’s nothing wrong with being capable of standing on your own.

But what happens when “I can do it myself” quietly becomes “I have to do it myself”?

In Episode 3 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we’re talking about the complicated relationship between independence, vulnerability, and connection—and what happens when self-sufficiency stops being a strength and starts becoming a defense mechanism.

We’re getting into:

🧠 Hyper-independence — why some of us become so determined not to need anyone that asking for help starts to feel almost impossible.

🫂 Vulnerability — why letting people show up for us can feel more uncomfortable than doing everything ourselves.

🤝 Codependence, intradependence & interdependence — and why these concepts aren't interchangeable.

🏠 Community & connection — how we've gone from intensely interconnected local communities to a world where we can be connected to thousands of people and still feel completely alone.

💭 Asking for help — why needing other people isn't necessarily weakness, and why receiving support can be just as difficult as offering it.

And we’re asking a bigger question:

What if independence isn't the opposite of dependence?

Maybe the goal isn't to need nobody.

Maybe it's to become independent enough to stand on our own, intradependent enough to understand ourselves, and interdependent enough to know when we don't have to.

Because there's a strange contradiction in modern life: we're more connected than ever, but we're increasingly expected to solve our problems individually.

Maybe sometimes we're trying to solve collective problems individually.

And maybe rebuilding community doesn't mean giving up our autonomy. Maybe it means figuring out how to belong without disappearing—and how to rely on other people without losing ourselves.

🎙️ High Frequency, Low Noise

Two unsupervised women. Big questions. Low noise. No rulebook.

✨ Keep your frequency high, the noise low, and stay shamelessly unsupervised.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Okay, but… what the hell does “high frequency” actually mean?

Is it physics? Spirituality? A metaphor? A wellness buzzword? Or are we all just supposed to be vibrating better now?

In Episode 2 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we’re getting into what “raising your frequency” actually means—and what happens when science, spirituality, good intentions, and a little bit of bullshit start using the same vocabulary.

Because we’re all for good vibes.

We just have questions!

Come get weird with us.

High frequency. Low noise. No rulebook. ✨ Stay shamelessly unsupervised.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Episode #1: High Frequency, Low Noise, and “The Truth”

In our very first episode, we’re diving into the question that quietly shapes everything else we’ll explore on this show: why do we believe the things we believe, and how much of that is actually true?

Ultimately, this episode isn’t about proving anyone wrong. It’s about noticing the moment we stop asking the question altogether. Confirmation bias, algorithms, echo chambers: none of that makes you broken, it just means you have a brain that’s trying to conserve energy. The real risk is mistaking “familiar” for “true,” or “fast” for “intuitive.” Intuition isn’t the enemy of critical thinking; assumption is, and that gap between the two is where we’re going to be spending a lot of time on this show.

Subscribe now

Sources, Organized by Section

1. Why We Believe Things That Aren’t True

APA Psychologists are taking aim at misinformation with these powerful strategies

APA Psychological science can help counter spread of misinformation

APA Consensus Statement (PDF) — Using Psychological Science to Understand and Fight Health Misinformation

APA What psychological factors make people susceptible to believe and act on misinformation?

APA Why we fall for fake news: Hijacked thinking or laziness?

APA How and why does misinformation spread?

1a. Your Truth, My Truth, and THE Truth

Medium (Dialectic Reason) Is Truth Really Subjective? Relativism vs. Objectivity

Catholic Answers Your Truth, My Truth: How to Understand and Refute Relativistic Thinking

Substack What is truth?

1b. The Truth in Things We Don’t Understand

Association for Psychological Science All About Awe

Templeton The Science of Awe

Psychology Today The Quiet Power of Awe

2. Confirmation Bias

Simply Psychology Confirmation Bias In Psychology: Definition & Examples

Britannica Confirmation bias

Scribbr What Is Confirmation Bias?

3. Cognitive Bias & Rational Choice Theory

Britannica Cognitive bias

Wikipedia List of cognitive biases

Wikipedia Choice-supportive bias

5. How Algorithms Reinforce Belief

Reuters Institute (Oxford) Echo chambers, filter bubbles, and polarisation: a literature review

The Conversation Feedback loops and echo chambers: How algorithms amplify viewpoints

NCBI/PMC Through the Newsfeed Glass: Rethinking Filter Bubbles and Echo Chambers

5a. Echo Chamber: Treading the Line

Ed Latimore What Is a Social Media Echo Chamber? (How Algorithms Trap You)

arXiv A Systematic Review of Echo Chamber Research

6. Intuition vs. Assumption

Mindtools Intuition and Decision-Making (Kahneman’s System 1/2, Gary Klein’s research)

Springer (Business Research) When rational decision-making becomes irrational: intuition effectiveness

Wiley Intuition in Decision Making: Insights From Drift Diffusion Modeling

7. Why Being “Open-Minded” Doesn’t Mean Believing Everything

Psychology Today Open-Mindedness and Skepticism in Critical Thinking

Bellevue College Critical Thinking note 33: Open-Mindedness

FunBlocks The Power of Open-Mindedness: A Mental Model

Fondation Jasmin Roy Open-Mindedness: A Key to Better Understanding the World

8. Origins of Intuition (Jung / MBTI)

Simply Psychology Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)

Psychology Town Deciphering Personalities with the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: An Extension of Jung’s Theories

Medical News Today Myers-Briggs: 16 personality types and their accuracy

8a. Quantifying Intuition

Wiley Intuition in Decision Making: Insights From Drift Diffusion Modeling

Cambridge Core How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

Anxious. Avoidant. Secure. Disorganized.

Congratulations! You've spent seven minutes on TikTok, and now you've diagnosed yourself, your ex, and that person who left you on read three weeks ago.

Attachment theory has become one of the internet's favorite ways to explain relationships. And while there's real psychology behind it, somewhere along the way, we started treating attachment styles like personality types, relationship horoscopes, and convenient explanations for why people behave like assholes.

In Episode 6 of High Frequency, Low Noise, we're digging into the actual science behind attachment theory, how our early relationships can influence the way we connect with others, and what happens when useful psychological frameworks become limiting labels.

We're talking childhood experiences, relationship patterns, emotional availability, and the difference between understanding someone's behavior and excusing it.

Because attachment theory can help us recognize patterns, but it can't tell us everything about a person. And knowing someone's attachment style doesn't mean we know their intentions, their capacity for growth, or whether they're right for us.

So, are we using psychology to better understand ourselves and each other? Or are we just getting really good at diagnosing people we haven't actually taken the time to understand?

Maybe the goal isn't to figure out which attachment style everyone has. Maybe it's to get a little better at actually attaching.

Hey! I'd love to hear your thoughts, send me a voice note.

Manifestation numbers. Sleepy Girl Mocktails. Healing frequencies. Mercury retrograde. Divine feminine energy. And apparently, we're all supposed to be detoxing something.

Girl. Be. So. Serious.

Welcome to our newest recurring segment on High Frequency, Low Noise, where we take the internet's wildest wellness trends, spiritual advice, psychological buzzwords, and questionable life hacks and ask one very important question:

Is there actually something to this, or are we being sold another beautifully packaged pile of bullshit?

We're digging into the science, the psychology, the marketing, and the occasional kernel of truth behind the things the internet swears will change our lives.

And, of course, we're putting each claim through our highly sophisticated, completely unofficial Serious Meter—from 1 (Girl, be so serious!) to 5 (Okay… this one's legit.).

Because sometimes there's real science behind the trend. Sometimes there's a useful idea buried under three layers of influencer marketing. And sometimes it's just someone with a ring light telling us to put cinnamon in our coffee.

We're not here to ruin anyone's fun. We're just here to ask: But is it true?

Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

Boundaries. Self-care. Protecting our peace. Cutting people off. Choosing ourselves.

Sounds healthy, right?

But what happens when the language of healing becomes a really good way to avoid anything uncomfortable? When “protecting my peace” actually means avoiding accountability? When a boundary becomes a wall? Or when walking away feels easier than having the conversation?

In Episode 4, we’re getting into the messy gray area between healing and avoidance—and asking some uncomfortable questions about boundaries, accountability, emotional safety, and the stories we tell ourselves when we don’t want to look at our own shit.

Because sometimes healing means walking away.

And sometimes healing means staying in the room.

Are we actually healing… or are we just getting really, really good at avoiding anything that hurts?