エピソード

  • Weekly Insight: AI Didn't Make Your Marketing Generic. It Exposed That It Always Was.

    Weekly Insight: AI Didn't Make Your Marketing Generic. It Exposed That It Always Was.
    2026/09/17
    Adobe reported a 57% engagement lift from an AI-selected creative treatment. Saul Marquez explains why that number can rise while your market position erodes, using a 2024 Science Advances study in which AI-assisted writers produced better stories that were also more similar to each other. For healthcare marketers, the collapse of the production barrier means positioning is now the only thing left to compete on. Key takeaways: A 2024 Science Advances study of 293 writers found AI assistance raised individual creativity while reducing collective novelty Adobe's reported 57% engagement uplift measures immediate response, not defensibility or comprehension Platforms reward easy-to-process creativity, so repeated optimization can strip the precision that made an idea distinctive The WHO has warned that generative systems encourage automation bias, a heightened risk when claims are clinical Scarcity of production talent used to disguise weak positioning; that scarcity is gone Judgment, not output, is now the constrained resource on a marketing team Do this today: Write the one sentence about your market that a direct competitor would refuse to sign Read your last ten assets back to back and check whether the arguments are interchangeable Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown Adobe Report: Read the Adobe Report on human-centered AI: https://business.adobe.com/blog/the-future-of-marketing-with-human-centered-ai
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Weekly Insight: Your ICP Describes a Market. It Doesn't Describe a Buyer

    Weekly Insight: Your ICP Describes a Market. It Doesn't Describe a Buyer
    2026/09/10
    Healthcare converts leads at roughly 13%, and cycles stretch 35% longer when multiple stakeholders have to approve. Saul Marquez argues the root cause sits earlier than most teams look: an ICP built from bed count and EMR platform instead of buying readiness. Here is what a situational ICP looks like and how to rebuild yours from ten deals you already closed. Key takeaways: Average MQL to SQL conversion in healthcare sits near 13%, dragged down by compliance and long approval chains. Multi-stakeholder approval extends buying cycles by about 35%. Two firmographically identical health systems can have opposite buying readiness. Firmographics cannot see the difference. Over 80% of providers saw value-based care contracts grow recently, which is a concrete, dateable buying trigger. Only about a third of providers rate their data integration as excellent, which should narrow the ICP for integration-dependent products. Revenue leaks from broken handoffs and poor routing can cost B2B companies up to $500K annually. Do this today: Pull your last ten to fifteen closed-won deals and document the trigger event for each in one sentence. Add one situational field to your CRM account record and require it before an account enters the target list. Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown here
    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
  • Weekly Insight: Great Open Rate. Zero Replies. Your ABM Is Personalized, Not Relevant.

    Weekly Insight: Great Open Rate. Zero Replies. Your ABM Is Personalized, Not Relevant.
    2026/09/03
    A rep spends two hours personalizing an ABM email, earns a strong open rate, and gets zero replies. Saul Marquez explains why that outcome is a thinking problem rather than a copy problem, and lays out the Specificity Test and the six-question Account Strategy Brief that separate personalization from relevance. Essential listening for teams selling into committees of six to ten healthcare stakeholders. Key takeaways: Personalization signals "I know who you are"; relevance signals "I understand what you're dealing with" Baseline claims (better outcomes, efficiency, digital transformation, cost reduction) are the price of entry, not differentiation Healthcare buying committees routinely include six to ten stakeholders with incompatible evaluation criteria A CFO reads ROI and margin; a CIO reads integration, security, and implementation burden. One message cannot carry both The Specificity Test: strip the name and opening line, then check whether the message could go to any account on the list Hamid Ghanadan of The Linus Group: message from three vantage points, your POV, the market's, and the customer's daily life Do this today: Run the Specificity Test on the last ABM sequence your team sent Answer the six Account Strategy Brief questions before writing any new copy Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Weekly Insight: Own Three Topics, Or Stay Replaceable

    Weekly Insight: Own Three Topics, Or Stay Replaceable
    2026/08/27
    Saul Marquez breaks down why healthcare executives who comment on every headline stay invisible where it counts. 56% of buyers use thought leadership to evaluate vendors, yet most leaders spread themselves across eight topics and own none. Inside: the three-topic system that turns commentary into authority. Key takeaways: 73% of decision-makers trust thought leadership over traditional marketing materials (2024 Edelman-LinkedIn report). 56% of target buyers and 55% of hidden buyers in finance, operations, legal and procurement use it during vendor evaluation. Visibility is not authority. Commenting on every headline makes an executive interchangeable. The three topics to own: a problem customers are already solving, experience nobody can replicate, one change reshaping the market. The test for a defensible topic: could someone write this without having done the work? Do this today: List your last ten posts, sort them by topic, and cut down to the three you own. Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown. Full report: 2025 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Report: https://www.edelman.com/expertise/Business-Marketing/2025-b2b-thought-leadership-report
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Weekly Insight: The Conference Trap: What Healthcare GTM Teams Get Wrong About Events

    Weekly Insight: The Conference Trap: What Healthcare GTM Teams Get Wrong About Events
    2026/08/20
    A mid-size healthtech company can spend up to $500,000 on a single HIMSS presence and still walk away with no pipeline number to show for it. In this episode, Saul Marquez breaks down why the problem isn't the event, it's the missing commercial motion around it, and lays out the four-part playbook that turns conference spend into traceable revenue. Key takeaways: A full HIMSS presence for a mid-size healthtech company runs $150,000 to $500,000, yet most teams can't name a single pipeline figure it produced. 52% of business leaders rank events as their highest-ROI channel, while 94% of marketers admit they fail to convert event leads into opportunities. Conference ROI breaks in three places: no target account list, existing-customer time counted as new business, and a generic post-event follow-up. The average B2B follow-up takes 42 hours, but leads reached within five minutes are 22 times more likely to qualify. Teams with proper attribution have documented event ROMI of four to twelve times spent, and up to a thirty-three times lift in closed deals traced to event activity. Do this today: Before your next conference, write down the named accounts you're trying to move. Not a category. Actual names. Define one commercial objective for the event in numbers: target-account meetings booked, net-new conversations, or deals accelerated. Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown:https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/conference-trap-what-healthcare-gtm-teams-get-wrong-events-marquez-1bp3e/?trackingId=Ic6e0994QmWuDPxaUFf%2BtA%3D%3D
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Weekly Insight: Change Management Is the Hidden Revenue Killer in Healthcare GTM

    Weekly Insight: Change Management Is the Hidden Revenue Killer in Healthcare GTM
    2026/08/13
    Saul Marquez breaks down why one number in a new agentic AI survey matters more than the ones ranked above it. Thirty-one percent of B2B go-to-market leaders name change management friction as a barrier, and it hides inside almost every other problem on the list. In healthcare, where cycles are long and systems are fragmented, that friction is where revenue quietly leaks out. Key takeaways: 31% of UK and US B2B GTM leaders name change management friction as a barrier to agentic AI adoption (Revsure, State of Agentic AI in B2B GTM) Higher-ranked barriers: security and privacy (54%), accuracy and reliability (47%), data integration (44%), lack of in-house expertise (32%) Change management rarely appears on its own. It hides inside data integration, expertise gaps, and distrust of AI outputs Healthcare multiplies the friction: long sales cycles, multiple decision-makers, compliance, fragmented systems, competing versions of the truth Revenue leaks when marketing goes data-driven but sales trusts its own notes, or when comp still rewards siloed behavior The teams that win treat change management as a commercial discipline: define the behavior, align incentives, reduce friction, and check whether the work actually changed Do this today: Pick one rep and have them walk you through how they actually worked a recent deal. Compare it to how you told them to work six months ago. Define one specific behavior change for one team, and tie it to how that team is measured. Links: Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/change-management-hidden-revenue-killer-healthcare-gtm-marquez-bx95e/?trackingId=pIQ%2BpSavRrOH9SvkaN6qUA%3D%3D Full report: The 2026 State of B2B Go-To-Market (GTM): From Activity Engine to Revenue Discipline: https://www.outcomesrocket.com/blogs/the-2026-state-of-b2b-go-to-market-gtm-strategy-from-activity-engine-to-revenue-discipline
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Weekly Insight: Downloads Are Vanity. Contacts and Contracts Are Sanity.

    Weekly Insight: Downloads Are Vanity. Contacts and Contracts Are Sanity.
    2026/08/06
    We surveyed 861 marketing and PR professionals with Health Podcast Library, and one number explains everything wrong with branded podcasting right now: 45.8% of companies without a show say the reason isn't budget or talent, it's that they don't believe podcasts work. In this 60-second breakdown, Saul Marquez explains why the skeptics aren't wrong, they're just responding to evidence that doesn't exist, and what medtech and healthtech GTM leaders should do about it this week. Read the full newsletter for the complete breakdown, including the three moves for teams already running a show and the three for teams thinking about starting one: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/downloads-vanity-contacts-contracts-sanity-saul-w-marquez-nglve/ Full report: Podcasts as a Marketing Powerhouse, Strategies, Impact and Future Outlook 2026 → outcomesrocket.com/insights/podcasts-as-a-marketing-powerhouse-strategies-impact-and-future-outlook-2026 Want the playbook we use: outcomesrocket.com/podcast-powered-growth
    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
  • Weekly Insight: Breaking the Healthcare Marketing Cycle with the Content Flywheel

    Weekly Insight: Breaking the Healthcare Marketing Cycle with the Content Flywheel
    2026/07/30
    Discover a smarter approach to healthcare marketing that leverages a continuous content loop. Instead of one-and-done posts, learn how to build a self-sustaining content system that maximizes effort and impact. Key topics: The common exhaustion cycle of healthcare marketing teams Introduction to the content flywheel concept How to repurpose content across different channels efficiently The benefits of building a content loop for SEO and engagement Practical steps to implement the flywheel strategy in your marketing efforts The role of podcasts, blogs, newsletters, and social posts in a unified system How to create lasting content that keeps working for you over time Examples of how this system can replace the repetitive content creation cycle Check out the full newsletter here: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/your-best-ideas-should-one-time-assets-saul-w-marquez-5jnic
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分