Government Efficiency Report Reveals Mixed Progress: Savings and Spending Challenges in UK Public Sector Reform
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Government Efficiency Report Reveals Mixed Progress: Savings and Spending Challenges in UK Public Sector Reform
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
The Spending Review 2025 highlights net efficiencies across major departments, targeting a **4.0% net gain after investment**, amounting to £13.8 billion in savings for the 2025-26 period. Key sectors like Transport, Energy Security, and HMRC are posting efficiency rates up to **13.1%**, especially where digital transformation and streamlined processes are being pushed. However, authorities admit many efficiency figures, especially around local government gains, remain unquantified at this stage, raising questions about how much real bite there is behind the bureaucratic bark[1].
Meanwhile, public sector borrowing continues to raise eyebrows. In May 2025 alone, the UK borrowed £17.7 billion, £0.7 billion more than the same month last year and surpassing official forecasts, marking it the second highest May borrowing figure on record since 1993, outside the pandemic period. This was driven by a **£2.8 billion increase in central government goods and services spending**—mostly through pay rises and inflation—while net social benefits also rose by £2.0 billion[3]. This pattern suggests that despite efficiency commitments, cost pressures are outpacing savings.
On the other side of the Atlantic, the United States has taken a playful but pointed approach, with the U.S. Digital Service reorganized as the Department of Government Efficiency—abbreviated as DOGE. This move aims to cut red tape and turbocharge government modernization. Whether DOGE will shepherd bureaucracy into a leaner, more responsive era or simply add another layer of acronyms remains to be seen[2].
Listeners should note that while governments are trumpeting their drive for efficiency, headlines and hard data still point to ballooning costs and only cautious optimism about lasting reform. For now, the question remains: is the bureaucracy truly barking mad, or just still chasing its own tail?