『Future-Proof PT』のカバーアート

Future-Proof PT

Future-Proof PT

著者: Dana Strauss PT DPT and Alex Bendersky PT DPT
無料で聴く

概要

Want to stay ahead of the curve in physical therapy? Future Proof PT brings you straight-talking, no-nonsense conversations about what really matters in healthcare today. From dissecting policy risks and opportunities to exploring innovative practice and payment models to practical ways to accelerate your career growth, we're your go-to source for understanding the forces reshaping our profession and the healthcare industry at large.


Through candid dialogue and real-world perspectives, we're building a community of forward-thinking professionals working both in and out of direct patient care. They aren't just adapting to change – they're shaping it.


Whether you're looking to understand market dynamics or seeking professional growth, each episode delivers actionable insights that will transform how you view the future of healthcare. Come join the conversation!

Copyright 2025 Dana Strauss, PT, DPT and Alex Bendersky, PT, DPT
政治・政府 政治学 経済学 衛生・健康的な生活 身体的病い・疾患
エピソード
  • Episode 25 | Pain Science, Manual Therapy, and the Economics of PT with Paul Ingraham
    2026/01/26
    Explore the intersection of evidence-based practice, healthcare economics, and pseudoscience in rehab, plus practical strategies for clinicians who want to do better without going brokeIs your physical therapy practice built on evidence, or just what pays? In this episode, we sit down with Paul Ingraham, science writer and founder of painscience.com, to challenge the line between evidence-based practice and pseudoscience in rehab. We explore why manual therapy needs a serious reframe, how economic pressures push clinicians toward uncertain treatments, and whether honest patient communication can coexist with running a profitable practice. Paul doesn't hold back: he argues that most PTs operate in a gray zone where research is weak, outcomes are unpredictable, and informed consent is virtually nonexistent. You might not agree with everything he says—but you'll hopefully question what you do and why you do it. Maybe you'll look into the scientific evidence behind your current common care plans.Topics include:Evidence-based practice vs. pseudoscience: where's the line? Why manual therapy should be reframed as an experimental intervention in many casesThe role of informed consent in uncertain treatments (not unlike what we hope physicians do when prescribing a treatment plan whose results are uncertain)How value-based care incentives better outcomes and discourages pseudoscienceThe economics of PT: balancing integrity with incomeWhy strength training and exercise therapy are still key ingredients in PT treatment plansTeaching intellectual humility and critical thinking in healthcare educationPractical strategies for clinicians who want to practice honestly without going brokePaul Ingraham is a Vancouver science writer and a former Registered Massage Therapist, a profession he left in 2010 over concerns about its pseudoscientific nonsense. Since then, he has been publishing PainScience.com full-time, a website about the science of pain and injury, known for its rich footnotes and anti-quackery activism. The site offers hundreds of articles and ten books, all based on a huge bibliography. Paul was an active amateur athlete for decades, especially in ultimate (the Frisbee sport), but has now retired from competitive intensity and “just” does a lot of running and cycling, despite grappling with his own chronic pain/illness problems since 2015.Here's where you can find Paul! https://www.painscience.com/subscribe [free newsletter]https://www.painscience.com/ebookshttps://www.facebook.com/painsciencehttps://www.threads.net/@painscihttps://bsky.app/profile/painsci.bsky.socialhttps://x.com/painsciSign up for our newsletter, where Alex shares weekly literature summaries and links relevant to therapy.Sign up for our sister publication, authored by Dana, Timeless Autonomy. Dana covers weekly health policy insights and tips on career growth for clinicians.Subscribe to our YouTube Channel
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 12 分
  • Episode 24: The Economics of PT-First | Real Data on Cost Savings and Outcomes
    2026/01/17
    How crazy is it that proven interventions in healthcare take so long to spread, even when they show clear economic and clinical benefits?Innovation in healthcare is painfully difficult to get into widespread adoption, even after proven successful.This episode discusses the results of a nine year-old study at Geisinger Health System on a PT-First "bundle" that's just as relevant today. But the disturbing part about it is it's not common to find a structure like this one, where a shift in incentives changed the care pathway for patients.Here are major takeaways from the episode:PT-First Models Are Economically Proven: When properly structured with the right incentives, physical therapy as a first-line intervention for musculoskeletal conditions reduces costs and improves outcomes. This has been demonstrated at scale.Risk Stratification Is Your Friend: Implementing tools that identify high-risk patients (for joint replacement, high utilization, poor psychosocial factors) helps you target PT-first interventions where they'll have the most impact.Understand the Regulatory Landscape: Know the difference between what commercial plans can do versus Medicare constraints. This helps you understand why some innovations work in certain settings but not others, and where to focus your advocacy efforts. And don't forget to explore CMS Innovation Center Models! They are a key opportunity for Medicare to offer flexibilities outside of statute and PTs and OTs can 100% benefit from this!Patient Incentives Matter as Much as Provider Incentives: Waiving or reducing copays for PT-first approaches changes patient behavior. Consider how your practice can work with payers to create these incentives.Think Beyond Traditional Treatment: The food-as-medicine example challenges PTs to consider all drivers of health outcomes, not just manual therapy and exercise. What are the non-medical factors affecting your patients' success?Health Systems with Their Own Plans Are Innovation Leaders: These integrated systems have the most flexibility and motivation to try new models. Consider targeting these organizations for partnerships or employment.The "Why Not Everywhere?" Question: Just because something works doesn't mean it spreads quickly in healthcare. Understanding the barriers to adoption (regulatory constraints, organizational inertia, population mix) helps you be more strategic about implementing change.Keep It Simple: As Alex notes - "kiss things" "(keep it simple, stupid"). The most successful innovations have clear, straightforward incentive structures that are easy for patients and providers to understand and act on.Find the article we discuss in this episode on a PT-First payment model here.Sign up for our newsletter, where Alex shares weekly literature summaries and links relevant to therapy.Sign up for our sister publication, authored by Dana, Timeless Autonomy. Dana covers weekly health policy insights and tips on career growth for clinicians.Subscribe to our YouTube ChannelWe also discussed in this episode the "Geisinger Fresh Food Farmacy" research. The pilot evaluated whether providing free, healthy food for the entire household of a food-insecure adult with Type 2 diabetes improves health outcomes and reduces healthcare use. In the podcast, Dana described what she recalled from memory. The study is found here but we can't find access to the article unlocked. Asking "Claude.AI," it said in this observational pilot study with 37 participants showed a 2.1% average drop in HbA1c levels and an 80% reduction in healthcare costs (from $240,000 to $48,000 per member per year). Additional research has recently been published put we can't locate it unlocked online. It looks like funding was from the 2018 Farm Bill.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Episode 23: The Alchemist and Healthcare | Why Your Journey is the Treasure
    2026/01/06
    Check out the You Tube version of the podcast here.In this episode, Dana and Alex review the research articles Alex shared with Future Proof PT newsletter subscribers on January 4th, 2025, exploring what these studies reveal about healthcare transformation and what PTs can learn from them.They dive into the 4% screening tool study that dramatically improved outcomes by simply asking patients about their needs—a small intervention that created massive value. This leads to a bigger discussion: why are PTs starving on a shrinking fee-for-service diet when alternative models exist? The answer isn't that value-based care doesn't work—it's that most clinicians haven't tested it yet.We explore Richard Feynman's principles of honest self-evaluation and scientific integrity, applying them to healthcare's reluctance to experiment. Alex shares that he recently reread The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho and that the story's message resonated with him differently this time around. He focuses on a key moment in the book where the shepherd's father gives him money to pursue his journey—not because the father expects his son to find treasure, but because the father himself never took that journey and wants something better for his son.Alex connects this to his own mindset as a parent: he wants his children to have opportunities and experiences he didn't have. This parallels the healthcare discussion because leaders and early adopters in value-based care are essentially doing the same thing—investing in a journey they may not fully benefit from themselves, but paving the way for the next generation of clinicians.The core insight Alex draws is that the treasure in The Alchemist wasn't the gold the shepherd was seeking, but the transformation and self-discovery he experienced along the way. Similarly, PTs who experiment with value-based care aren't just chasing financial models—they're undergoing professional transformation that makes them more valuable, regardless of whether any single model succeeds.This reframing positions the journey itself as the reward, and encourages clinicians to stop waiting for value-based care to be "proven" before they engage. Like the shepherd's father investing in his son's journey, today's leaders are investing in the profession's future.Other key points include: why you need a lottery ticket to win (you have to participate to benefit), how to A-B test your way into value-based care leadership, why leadership starts with one person taking action, and how systems thinking can help PTs break free from fee-for-service heuristics. Stop waiting for permission. Start leading from your clinic. The R&D phase of healthcare needs you.Key Topics in Episode 23:Reviewing research articles from Future Proof PT newsletter (Jan 4, 2025)The 4% screening tool study and its implications for value creationWhy "it doesn't work" is invalid if you never tested itThe sheep analogy: surviving vs. thriving in healthcareRichard Feynman's lesson on honest self-evaluation and scientific integrityA-B testing your way into value-based care leadershipWhy small experiments and lottery tickets matter in healthcare transformationHow the journey of experimentation IS the treasure (lessons from The Alchemist)Systems thinking and recognizing our own fallibility in healthcare decision-making"The Alchemist"*"Thinking Fast and Slow"*"The Almanac of Naval Ravikant"*Alex's summary and takeaways of the five research articles we discuss on the episode.Accountable Health Communities Model Findings at a Glance*affiliate link
    続きを読む 一部表示
    34 分
まだレビューはありません