In this solo rip, I unpack why the term “Plebslop” resonated so hard and use it to frame a bigger critique of purity tests in Bitcoin culture. I trace how the pleb meme drifted from useful humility to low-signal tribalism, how post-FTX call‑out dynamics hardened into gatekeeping, and why “protecting plebs” became a trap for engagement farming. From my own journey—years leading in woke circles, failing their ultimate purity tests, and breaking with that world over the vaccine—I argue that the only test that matters here is accountability to your best self and the signal you ship, not your faction, identity, or rhetoric.

I lay out a standard for participation that rejects moral grandstanding and embraces ruthless accountability, rising standards, and real work. Bitcoin isn’t a moral credential; it’s concrete that must hold. So ditch the purity tournaments, stop consuming Plebslop, and surround yourself with people who will hold you to your word and help you clear the ever-rising bar. Episode one of “The Fundamentals of Plebslop” is a call to build culture that wins—by eliminating purity tests and choosing signal over slop.

• 'Rock Paper Bitcoin' podcast (host’s show): https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rock-paper-bitcoin/id1686471174
• 'The Bugle Weekly' : https://www.bugle.news/podcast/

In this emergency FoF, I address a mischaracterization sparked by a boost I left for my friends at The Bugle Weekly and their conversation with Matt Odell. I set the record straight: I don’t have “Odell Derangement Syndrome.” My criticism after last year’s Rabbit Hole Recap comedy event in Nashville wasn’t about jokes or stage chops—it was about the aftermath and the culture of fear I witnessed around offering honest feedback about influential people in our space. I explain why power dynamics matter, why OPSEC still isn’t funny, and why the response to an incident often tells you more than the incident itself.

I also give Matt his due. His appearance with Rod and Dick was candid and gracious, and I respect what he’s built. I share the additional context I’ve heard from the free Samourai community, acknowledge how OpenSats decisions can shape perceptions, and urge greater awareness of the influence leaders wield. This episode is about accuracy, respect, and clearing the slate so we can move forward honestly.

Rock Paper Bitcoin Episode 44: Opsec Isnt Funny
https://fountain.fm/episode/DMzVENSZI3Q5ONJB5vrX

Bitcoin for Institutions:
Zeuspay: https://zeuspay.com/btc-for-institutions

Fundamentals on Nostr: npub12eml5kmtrjmdt0h8shgg32gye5yqsf2jha6a70jrqt82q9d960sspky99g
Fundamentals on X: @Fundamentals21m

Summary: This conversation explores the unique nature of hodling Bitcoin as a distinctly human action, contrasting it with the capabilities of artificial intelligence and the challenges faced by institutions in maintaining Bitcoin holdings. The discussion highlights the limitations of AI in predicting human behavior, the inherent pressures on institutions to sell, and the potential for governments to hold Bitcoin more effectively than companies or pensions. Ultimately, it concludes that hodling Bitcoin may become a defining characteristic of humanity in the digital age.

Takeaways:

• Hodling Bitcoin is a uniquely human action.
• AI cannot accurately predict human actions.
• Institutions face significant pressure to sell Bitcoin.
• MicroStrategy exemplifies an institution that hodls effectively.
• Governments may have a lower time preference for Bitcoin than companies.
• Pensions are unlikely to hold Bitcoin long-term due to fiduciary pressures.
• Bitcoiners leave less digital footprint for AI to analyze.
• AI's predictive models will struggle with Bitcoiners' behavior.
• The pressure to sell Bitcoin is too great for most institutions.
• Hodling Bitcoin may become a way to prove humanity in the digital world.