エピソード

  • Brian Walshe Murder Trial Halted: Psychiatric Evaluation REQUIRED
    2025/10/08
    The Brian Walshe murder case has taken a shocking turn, with the court ordering a psychiatric evaluation. In this exclusive Hidden Killers legal breakdown, Tony Brueski examines what this stunning development means for the future of the trial and the complexities of the justice system. We'll trace the compelling digital evidence, from the chilling iPad searches for dismemberment techniques to the damning Home Depot purchases that led to Walshe's arrest. This video isn't about a verdict; it's an in-depth analysis of the legal process, focusing on the critical question of competency to stand trial. We’ll explain the legal standards, including the "Dusky standard," and discuss how a finding of incompetence could suspend the case indefinitely. From courtroom delays to psychological assessments at Bridgewater State Hospital, this is a front-row seat to the high-stakes legal twist in one of the year's most high-profile murder cases. Join us as we unravel the legal implications and explore the reasons behind this significant pause.


    Hashtags:
    #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #MurderTrial #TrueCrime #PsychEval #CompetencyToStandTrial #HiddenKillers #LegalTwist #JusticeSystem #LegalAnalysis #TrueCrimeNews #CourtroomDrama #CrimePodcast #JusticeDelayed

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Brian Walshe Trial: Why Even a ‘Dirty Cop’ Can’t Save You From Your Own Google Searches-WEEK IN REVIEW
    2025/10/05
    Brian Walshe Trial: Why Even a ‘Dirty Cop’ Can’t Save You From Your Own Google Searches-WEEK IN REVIEW

    As the October 20th trial date approaches, the case against Brian Walshe—the Massachusetts father accused of murdering and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe—has become one of the most closely watched legal battles in the state. And it’s not just the shocking allegations at stake. The defense is trying to pull the shadow of another high‑profile case—the Karen Read investigation—straight into this courtroom.

    In this episode, we break down how Walshe’s attorneys are arguing that Norfolk County is too tainted for a fair trial. They’re pointing to the now‑famous misconduct of former State Trooper Michael Proctor, who was removed from the Read case after crude, biased texts surfaced. Their message to the court: if the system was “dirty” there, it can’t be trusted here.

    But prosecutors say the Walshe case stands on its own—and the evidence they’re about to put in front of a jury may prove it. We examine the digital footprint investigators say Brian Walshe left in the hours and days after Ana disappeared: chilling Google searches about body disposal, decomposition, and whether you can be charged without a body. We look at the physical evidence pulled from a Swampscott dumpster—items prosecutors say carry Ana’s DNA, including a rug, jewelry, and a watch photographed on her wrist just hours before she vanished.

    This is where modern crime meets modern accountability: when your own clicks, purchases, and discarded objects become the star witnesses against you. In this episode, we unpack why the defense’s “crooked cop” strategy may falter in the face of independent, forensic evidence—and what this case tells us about how juries weigh misconduct claims against hard data.

    #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #KarenRead #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DigitalForensics #LegalStrategy #CrimeAndJustice #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Brian Walshe Trial: Why Even a ‘Dirty Cop’ Can’t Save You From Your Own Google Searches
    2025/10/03
    Brian Walshe Trial: Why Even a ‘Dirty Cop’ Can’t Save You From Your Own Google Searches

    As the October 20th trial date approaches, the case against Brian Walshe—the Massachusetts father accused of murdering and dismembering his wife, Ana Walshe—has become one of the most closely watched legal battles in the state. And it’s not just the shocking allegations at stake. The defense is trying to pull the shadow of another high‑profile case—the Karen Read investigation—straight into this courtroom.

    In this episode, we break down how Walshe’s attorneys are arguing that Norfolk County is too tainted for a fair trial. They’re pointing to the now‑famous misconduct of former State Trooper Michael Proctor, who was removed from the Read case after crude, biased texts surfaced. Their message to the court: if the system was “dirty” there, it can’t be trusted here.

    But prosecutors say the Walshe case stands on its own—and the evidence they’re about to put in front of a jury may prove it. We examine the digital footprint investigators say Brian Walshe left in the hours and days after Ana disappeared: chilling Google searches about body disposal, decomposition, and whether you can be charged without a body. We look at the physical evidence pulled from a Swampscott dumpster—items prosecutors say carry Ana’s DNA, including a rug, jewelry, and a watch photographed on her wrist just hours before she vanished.

    This is where modern crime meets modern accountability: when your own clicks, purchases, and discarded objects become the star witnesses against you. In this episode, we unpack why the defense’s “crooked cop” strategy may falter in the face of independent, forensic evidence—and what this case tells us about how juries weigh misconduct claims against hard data.

    #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #KarenRead #TrueCrime #MurderTrial #DigitalForensics #LegalStrategy #CrimeAndJustice #HiddenKillers #CourtroomDrama


    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Brian Walshe's CHILLING Google Search History Revealed (Full List)
    2025/09/22
    Brian Walshe's CHILLING Google Search History Revealed (Full List)
    A killer’s smartest tool is also his biggest liability: the internet. In this stunning final segment, the Hidden Killers team reveals the most damning evidence against Brian Walshe—his own Google search history. In the hours and days after murdering his wife Ana, Brian used their son's iPad to meticulously research how to cover his tracks. The hosts read the horrifying, timeline-stamped list of his queries, including: "how long before a body starts to smell," "hacksaw best tool to dismember," and the bizarrely chilling, "can baking soda make a body smell good?"

    This digital footprint created an undeniable roadmap of his actions, leading directly to his shopping trip at Home Depot for tarps, a saw, and cleaning supplies. The discussion also uncovers a shocking crossover with another high-profile Massachusetts case: the lead detective initially assigned to the Walshe murder was none other than Michael Proctor, the controversial investigator from the Karen Read trial. We explain how Walshe’s defense team tried to leverage the Proctor scandal to get crucial evidence dismissed, a move that could have jeopardized the entire case. This is a fascinating look at how modern technology can both build an airtight case and how legal gymnastics can threaten to tear it all down.

    Hashtags:
    #BrianWalshe #GoogleHistory #DigitalFootprint #Evidence #MurderInvestigation #TrueCrimePodcast #AnaWalshe #HiddenKillers #MichaelProctor #KarenRead

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872



    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • Brian Walshe: The Anatomy of An Alleged Narcissistic Killer
    2025/09/22
    Brian Walshe: The Anatomy of An Alleged Narcissistic Killer
    From one case of hidden horror to another, the show transitions to the tragic murder of Ana Walshe at the hands of her husband, Brian Walshe. This segment meticulously pieces together the final days of their unraveling marriage. Ana, a successful real estate executive, was ready to leave. Brian, a convicted art fraudster on house arrest, was watching his world collapse. We delve into Brian Walshe's shocking history of manipulation and deceit, from selling fake Andy Warhol paintings to being explicitly disinherited by his neurosurgeon father, who called him "dishonest" in his will.

    The hosts explore the complex and toxic psychology of the Walshe relationship. Why did Ana stay for so long? Using the "frog in the boiling pot" analogy, Stacy Cole explains how abuse can escalate so gradually that the victim doesn't realize the danger until it's too late. The discussion also highlights the bizarre family dynamics, including the allegation that Brian's own mother hired a private investigator to tail Ana, seemingly more concerned with her daughter-in-law's rumored affair than her own son's criminal behavior. This is a deep dive into the anatomy of a narcissistic mindset and the catastrophic breakdown of a marriage that ended in murder.

    Hashtags:
    #AnaWalshe #BrianWalshe #TrueCrime #Murder #Investigation #Narcissist #Psychology #HiddenKillers #Massachusetts #ToxicRelationship

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • FBI Profiler on Kirk's Assassin, Hoffman's Depravity & Walshe's Google History
    2025/09/20
    FBI Profiler on Kirk's Assassin, Hoffman's Depravity & Walshe's Google History
    This is the complete, must-see episode of Hidden Killers, providing in-depth analysis of three of the most disturbing cases making headlines. The show opens with an exclusive interview with retired FBI behavioral analysis chief Robin Dreeke, who delivers a masterclass on the psychology of the lone wolf assassin who targeted Charlie Kirk. Dreeke dissects the root causes of modern radicalization, from the societal death of curiosity to the isolating echo chambers of social media that breed extremism.

    The broadcast then transitions to the shocking case of Jordan and Harley Hoffman, a picture-perfect Florida couple whose curated online life hid an alleged world of unspeakable depravity involving child SA material and horrific acts with animals. The team explores the dark side of social media and the psychology behind such a jarring public-private disconnect.

    Finally, the show meticulously breaks down the murder of Ana Walshe by her narcissistic husband, Brian Walshe. We uncover his long history of fraud and manipulation and reveal the damning digital footprint that became his undoing. You'll hear the complete, chilling list of his Google searches on how to dismember and dispose of a body, creating an undeniable timeline of a cold-blooded crime. From expert FBI profiling to the grim realities of modern crime, this episode is a comprehensive and compelling look at the darkness that hides in plain sight.

    Hashtags: #TrueCrime #FullEpisode #CharlieKirk #JordanHoffman #BrianWalshe #HiddenKillers #Podcast #FBIAgent #Investigation #CriminalPsychology

    Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?

    Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    Instagram
    https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Facebook
    https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
    Tik-Tok
    https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
    X Twitter
    https://x.com/tonybpod

    Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here:
    https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 47 分
  • Michael Proctor's Career of Alleged Cover-Ups In Memoriam
    2025/03/21
    Michael Proctor's Career of Alleged Cover-Ups In Memoriam Michael Proctor had everything a cop could want—respect, power, and a reputation that, for years, seemed untouchable. But by March 2025, he wasn’t just out of a job—he was a liability. Fired. Disgraced. Publicly humiliated in a way few law enforcement officers ever are. And it all comes back to one thing: the way he handled the Karen Read case. Or rather, how spectacularly he mishandled it. Proctor’s downfall wasn’t a quick and clean dismissal. This wasn’t one of those “effective immediately” situations where a cop gets caught doing something catastrophic and is gone by the next morning. No, this was a slow-motion train wreck. A case study in watching someone who thought they were untouchable get tangled in their own arrogance, their own bias, and their own mistakes. It started with a mistrial in July 2024—a high-profile, publicly scrutinized moment where Proctor didn’t just look bad on the stand, he became the story. His testimony wasn’t just shaky; it was an unmitigated disaster. Prosecutors must have known it was coming because the moment his text messages came out, it was game over. These weren’t just any texts. Proctor, the lead investigator in the Karen Read case, the man responsible for gathering evidence and ensuring a fair and unbiased investigation, repeatedly called the defendant a "wack-job ct," openly mocked her, laughed about digging through her phone for nude photos, and, in one of the most damning moments, said he hoped she would kill herself.** Think about that for a second. The guy responsible for finding out what actually happened had already made up his mind before the investigation even started. And he wasn’t keeping that bias to himself—he was texting it to people. Joking about it. Making it impossible to argue that he had conducted an objective investigation. And that wasn’t even the worst of it. Proctor had undisclosed personal connections to key people involved in the case. His own sister was friends with members of the Albert family—the same family that owned the house where John O’Keefe was last seen alive. His family knew them socially. And yet, he never disclosed this. He took the case, took control of the evidence, and built a case against Karen Read while having direct ties to the very people who could have been alternative suspects. Then there was the taillight evidence. The prosecution’s whole theory hinged on the idea that Karen Read backed into John O’Keefe with her SUV, breaking her taillight and leaving him outside to die in the snow. But the glass fragments that allegedly proved this theory didn’t make it to the crime lab for six weeks. Six weeks. And guess who was in charge of that evidence? Michael Proctor. When asked about the delay, there was no good answer. No chain of custody explanation that made sense. No reasonable justification for why a critical piece of forensic evidence in a high-profile murder case sat around for over a month before it was analyzed. The defense didn’t even need to prove that the evidence had been planted—they just had to point out how incompetent and sloppy the investigation was. And Proctor had done all of their work for them. The mistrial was a disaster. But the fallout was worse. Within hours of the decision, Proctor was suspended. That was the first clue that even his own department knew he was a problem. The Massachusetts State Police don’t just throw their own under the bus. It takes serious misconduct for them to cut someone loose. And by this point, they had no choice. Because once Proctor went down, he took a whole lot of other cases with him. One of the first dominoes to fall? The Ana Walshe murder trial. This was another major case where Proctor had been deeply involved—investigating the disappearance and presumed murder of Walshe by her husband, Brian. But after the Read mistrial, prosecutors dropped Proctor from their witness list. They weren’t even willing to put him on the stand. Think about what that means. Prosecutors, who normally go to great lengths to protect their investigators, decided it was better to move forward without their lead detective rather than risk having him testify. Then came the defense attorneys lining up to challenge other convictions. Proctor had worked on multiple murder cases, and now, anyone convicted in those cases had a potential argument for appeal. If Proctor had lied, manipulated evidence, or acted with bias in the Read case, who’s to say he hadn’t done it before? By late 2024, the Massachusetts State Police were scrambling. They launched internal investigations not just into Proctor, but **into his superiors—**the people who had allowed him to operate without oversight. They needed to figure out who knew what and when. And once they started digging, it became clear that Proctor wasn’t the only problem. The truth is, he was never operating alone. And...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    25 分
  • Trial Date Set for Brian Walshe in Wife's Disappearance and Murder Case
    2024/12/04
    A trial date has been set for Brian Walshe, the 48-year-old man accused of killing his wife, Ana, and dismembering her body in early 2023. Judge Diana Freniere, newly assigned to oversee the case, confirmed that jury selection will begin on October 20, 2025, and the trial will last approximately three to four weeks. Brian Walshe has been in custody without bail since January 18, 2023, when he was arrested following the disappearance of his wife. Ana Walshe, a 39-year-old mother of three, was last seen leaving their Cohasset, Massachusetts, home on New Year’s Day in 2023. Although her body has never been recovered, prosecutors allege that Brian killed Ana, dismembered her body, and discarded her remains in a trash dump. During a recent motion hearing in Norfolk Superior Court, Judge Freniere expressed her belief that the case could be expedited to trial sooner than anticipated. “I think that it’s reasonable that a case such as this one will be tried within two years from indictment. On the present schedule you suggest, I think it’s looking closer to the three-year mark. And I think that’s a little unnecessary,” the judge remarked, pushing for a more efficient process. The trial is now set to begin in 2025. The prosecution’s case hinges heavily on digital evidence. Investigators revealed that Brian Walshe made a series of suspicious Google searches on their son’s iPad, including inquiries about how to dispose of a body. Prosecutors are also relying on physical evidence, including a hacksaw found in a dumpster near Brian’s mother’s house, which contained a bone fragment. Additionally, pieces of clothing and jewelry, which prosecutors say were worn by Ana when she left her home, were discovered in the same location. However, the case has faced significant delays due to legal disputes over evidence. At the heart of these delays is a request from Walshe’s defense team for documents related to Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator on both the Walshe case and the high-profile Karen Read murder investigation. Walshe’s attorneys have requested email and text message correspondence from Proctor, hoping to find any communications that might suggest bias or unprofessional behavior in the investigation. Proctor, who has been suspended without pay after admitting to unprofessional conduct in the Read case, is under scrutiny for his involvement in both investigations. “There are concerns about the integrity of the investigation,” said Walshe’s attorney during the hearing. “We need to know whether any records exist that could suggest bias or lost information.” In addition to the legal wrangling over evidence, the prosecution has indicated that they are still awaiting DNA testing results from a private lab. These tests are crucial as they could provide critical evidence to link Walshe to the crime, but the results have been delayed due to disputes over the costs of testing and concerns about the potential destruction of key evidence. Throughout the proceedings, the prosecution has made it clear that the absence of Ana’s body will not undermine their case. “The digital evidence, along with physical findings like the hacksaw and the clothing, are critical components of the investigation,” said a prosecutor following the hearing. “This case is not just about finding the body. It’s about connecting the dots through the evidence we have.” As the legal battle over evidence continues, Brian Walshe’s defense team remains adamant that the charges against him are baseless, pleading not guilty to all charges, including murder, obstruction of justice, and improper conveyance of a human body. Despite the lack of a body, prosecutors are confident that they have a strong case to secure a conviction. The trial, which is expected to draw significant attention given its high-profile nature, will focus on the digital and physical evidence that ties Brian Walshe to the alleged crime. While the road to trial has been long and fraught with legal hurdles, both sides are preparing for what is expected to be a highly scrutinized and lengthy trial in 2025. #BrianWalshe #AnaWalshe #TrialDate #Cohasset #MurderCase #MissingWife #KarenRead #DigitalEvidence #Prosecutor #Defense Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com The latest on The Downfall of Diddy, The Trial of Karen Read, The Murder Of Maddie Soto, Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, The Menendez Brothers: Quest For Justice, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, The Murder Of Sandra Birchmore, and much more! Listen at https://...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分