エピソード

  • You pawned your lands at fourteen - would you cross the Alps?

    You pawned your lands at fourteen - would you cross the Alps?
    2026/10/16
    A sixteen-year-old excommunicated duke rides through Rome to reclaim a vanished Hohenstaufen inheritance-would you cross the Alps for a lost legacy?

    You pawned your lands at fourteen - would you cross the Alps?

    In this episode, we follow Conradin’s journey from Bavaria to Rome and the choices he made as the last legitimate male Hohenstaufen heir. We trace the decisions, alliances, and obstacles that pushed a teenager to pawn his duchy and march on an empire that had been disputed in his absence; what does that tell us about duty, ambition, and youth?

    Person: Conradin, Duke of Swabia and nominal King of Jerusalem and Sicily
    Date: July 1268 (entry into Rome); November 1267 (excommunication); 1254 (Conrad IV's death); 1258 (Manfred crowns himself)
    Location: Bavaria, the Alps, Verona, Rome, Italy
    Status: Excommunicated; last legitimate male heir of the House of Hohenstaufen

    - At six, Conradin was an infant heir while Manfred used a false rumor to seize Sicily and crown himself.
    - Conradin’s grandfather was Frederick II, whose death left a fracturing Hohenstaufen empire.
    - At fourteen Conradin pawned his Bavarian lands to finance an army and crossed the Alps without his guardian Louis II.
    - Pope Clement IV excommunicated Conradin in November 1267 to deter cities from supporting him.
    - In July 1268 a sixteen-year-old Conradin rode through Rome amid cheering crowds while his claim faced rival forces.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The King Whose Skull the Earth Refused to Keep

    The King Whose Skull the Earth Refused to Keep
    2026/10/15
    A king refuses a grave; a skull returns to Jerusalem with four cryptic words-what does it mean when even the earth rejects you?

    The King Whose Skull the Earth Refused to Keep

    In this episode, we follow the displaced reign of Jehoiakim and the incidents that made him uncontainable after death. From a name imposed by Pharaoh Necho II to shifting tribute between empires, what choices and acts led the world to leave his body unburied?

    Person: Jehoiakim (born Eliakim)
    Person: Josiah (father)
    Event: Renaming by Pharaoh Necho II and installation as king
    Date: Death in winter of 598 BC
    Document: Jeremiah’s scroll read in the Temple and shown to the king

    - Jehoiakim was passed over by his people for the throne; Pharaoh Necho II installed and renamed him.
    - He paid heavy tribute first to Egypt (100 talents silver, 1 talent gold) extracted from his people.
    - After Babylon’s victory at Carchemish (605 BC) Jehoiakim sent tribute to Nebuchadnezzar and served Babylon for three years.
    - In 601 BC Jehoiakim stopped paying Babylon and realigned with Egypt when Nebuchadnezzar temporarily retreated.
    - During these years Jehoiakim burned a scroll dictated by Jeremiah and had a prophet hunted for speaking against him.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • He Drowned in His Own Palace: The Silent Murder of Muhammad III

    He Drowned in His Own Palace: The Silent Murder of Muhammad III
    2026/10/14
    A nearly blind sultan drowns in a pool inside the Alhambra - who in his own palace had motive, means, and the silence to act?

    He Drowned in His Own Palace: The Silent Murder of Muhammad III

    In this episode, we follow the final years of Muhammad III of Granada, his rise, the people who surrounded him, and the moments that made his death possible. We trace political decisions, rivalries, and strategic gambits that set the stage for a killing shrouded in silence - who wanted him dead, and why?

    Person: Muhammad ibn Muhammad (Muhammad III, al‑Makhlu')
    Date: Born August 15, 1257; drowned January 21, 1314
    Location: Alhambra, Granada
    Event: Control of Gibraltar and Ceuta by May 1306; Treaty of Alcalá de Henares December 19, 1308
    Person: Ibn al‑Hakim al‑Rundi (powerful vizier); Atiq ibn al‑Mawl (military chief who opposed him)

    - Muhammad III ruled nearly seven years while almost blind and eventually spent years as a prisoner inside the Alhambra.
    - Ibn al‑Hakim rose from secretary to dhu al‑wizaratayn, accumulating civil and military authority and popular resentment without being removed by the sultan.
    - Atiq ibn al‑Mawl, a military chief whose family had been repeatedly passed over for the vizierate, built networks and waited for an opportunity.
    - By May 1306 Granada controlled both shores of the Strait of Gibraltar - Gibraltar, Algeciras, and Ceuta - dramatically raising the kingdom’s strategic profile.
    - After Christian kingdoms agreed to attack Granada in the 1308 treaty and sought Marinid and Aragonese coordination, political pressure and alliances reshaped who could gain by removing the sultan.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • If you were Caesar's son, which one person would you trust to keep you alive?

    If you were Caesar's son, which one person would you trust to keep you alive?
    2026/10/13
    A seventeen-year-old in Egypt must choose between a lie that keeps him alive and trusting Caesarion - who will betray him?

    If you were Caesar's son, which one person would you trust to keep you alive?

    In this episode, we follow the life and political stakes surrounding Caesarion, the boy raised as Ptolemy XV and claimed by Cleopatra as both pharaoh and Caesar’s heir. We trace the decisions, ceremonies, and rival claims that turned a teenager’s identity into a geopolitical threat and ask what choices a young claimant could make when blood and documents collide.

    Person: Caesarion (Ptolemy XV)
    Date: June 23, 47 BC (birth)
    Location: Alexandria, Egypt
    Event: Donations of Alexandria (34 BC)
    Person: Octavian (holder of Julius Caesar’s will)

    - Cleopatra installed Caesarion with royal epithets and temple reliefs presenting him as divine child and heir, using art as political argument.
    - Caesar never legally acknowledged him; instead his will named Octavian, leaving Caesarion a living claim without Roman legal weight.
    - At age three Cleopatra proclaimed him co-regent and pharaoh, making a child the focal point of dynastic legitimacy across two worlds.
    - Mark Antony’s 34 BC Donations publicly named Caesarion “King of Kings,” creating a provocation Octavian used to delegitimize Antony.
    - Octavian reframed the coming conflict as Roman virtue versus eastern corruption, turning Caesarion’s existence into political evidence rather than the central issue.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    18 分
  • The Sultan's Gift and the Guillotine: How Ibrahim Was Split

    The Sultan's Gift and the Guillotine: How Ibrahim Was Split
    2026/10/12
    A frontier emir gives a thousand horses to the Mamluk court, becomes viceroy-and faces a choice that could cost him everything. What would you do?

    The Sultan's Gift and the Guillotine: How Ibrahim Was Split

    In this episode, we trace Ibrahim I of Ramadan’s thirty-year relationship with the Mamluk empire, from his arrival in Damascus with a thousand horses to his promotion and the pressures that followed. We follow the decisions, alliances, battles, and negotiations that defined his rise and tested his survival-what choices did he make when the system changed the rules?

    Person: Ibrahim I of Ramadan
    Date: 1354-1383 (key events)
    Location: Cilicia, Sis, Damascus, Adana
    Event: Arrival with one thousand horses; appointment as na'ib of Adana
    Case: Ambush of Governor Timurbay; defeat near Marash (6 July 1381)

    - Ibrahim rode into Damascus with one thousand horses as tribute to secure Mamluk recognition.
    - The Mamluks named him Emir of the Turcomans in June 1354, embedding him in their patronage system.
    - He allied with the Dulkadirid Khalil and moved toward Sis, testing the limits of Mamluk tolerance.
    - After Mamluk governor Timurbay arrested and robbed Turcoman dignitaries, Ibrahim ambushed and captured him at a mountain pass near Belen.
    - Following defeat near Marash in 1381, Ibrahim apologized, was accepted back, and was promoted to na'ib (viceroy) of Adana in 1383.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    16 分
  • You see a rebel sit on your carpet-what do you do next?

    You see a rebel sit on your carpet-what do you do next?
    2026/10/11
    A rebel sits on the caliph’s carpet - must the ruler fight an empire already crumbling?

    You see a rebel sit on your carpet-what do you do next?

    In this episode we follow Marwan ibn Muhammad’s final years as caliph and the decisions, letters, and battles that defined his last six years of constant war. We look at the forces pressing in on the Umayyad Caliphate and the moments that forced choices about honor, survival, and duty.

    Person: Marwan ibn Muhammad (Marwan II)
    Date: 744-750 (reign and final years)
    Location: Damascus, Armenia, Harran, Rusafah, Kufa, Egypt
    Event: Kharijite revolts and Abbasid advance

    - A letter from Armenia shows Marwan warning his family about impending catastrophe years before he became caliph.
    - By 735 Marwan was a seasoned frontier commander governing Armenia and negotiating with local rulers.
    - In 744 Marwan became caliph as al-Walid II was overthrown and Syria fractured into competing claimants.
    - Kharijite forces under al-Dahhak seized Kufa and later al-Khaybari’s men overran Marwan’s camp and sat on his carpet.
    - Marwan spent six consecutive years fighting internal revolts, Abbasid movements in Khurasan, and revolts in Egypt while never surrendering.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • He paid the ransom. They beheaded him anyway - because of what he said next

    He paid the ransom. They beheaded him anyway - because of what he said next
    2026/10/10
    A Norse‑Gaelic king pays every coin of his ransom-then says one sentence that risks everything; what would you have done?

    He paid the ransom. They beheaded him anyway - because of what he said next

    In this episode, we follow Ascall mac Ragnaill meic Torcaill’s fall from a ruler who navigated shifting powers to a captive facing a final choice. We trace Dublin’s place between Irish and Norse worlds, the alliances and decisions that shaped Ascall’s rule, and the moment that led to his capture and execution-what would you have said then?

    Person: Ascall mac Ragnaill meic Torcaill
    Event: Fall of Dublin and Ascall’s capture
    Date: September 1170 (Dublin fell on 21 September 1170)
    Location: Dublin; exile in northern isles (Orkney/Hebrides/Mann unspecified)
    Topic: Norse-Gaelic kingship, ransom, fleet assembly

    - Ascall inherited Dublin after his uncle Brodar mac Torcaill was slain in 1160 and led a city fluent in Norse and Gaelic ties.
    - After High King Muirchertach Mac Lochlainn’s death, Ascall abandoned Diarmait Mac Lochlainn and paid four thousand cows in tribute to align with Ruaidrí Ua Conchobair.
    - Dublin’s fleet had served Henry II in 1165, showing Ascall’s engagement with English power years before the Normans arrived.
    - In August 1170, Strongbow and Mac Lochlainn captured parts of Leinster; on 21 September 1170 the sources record simply: “Dublin fell.”
    - Exiled to the northern islands, Ascall gathered a large fleet (sources give 60 or 100 ships) and returned-then was captured, ransomed, and made the fatal remark after payment.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    33 分
  • Forty days with bells on a camel - what would you refuse?

    Forty days with bells on a camel - what would you refuse?
    2026/10/09
    A captured Maratha king is paraded on a camel-what would you refuse when every choice is on display in the Mughal camps?

    Forty days with bells on a camel - what would you refuse?

    In this episode, we follow the forty days that marked the end of Sambhaji’s rule and the choices he faced while paraded through Mughal camps. The episode traces the movements, betrayals, and ceremonies that framed his final weeks and asks what those days meant for him and for the region.

    Person: Sambhaji, king of the Marathas
    Location: Sangameshwar; Bhima River at Koregaon
    Date: February 1, 1689 (capture); March 11, 1689 (beheading)
    Person: Aurangzeb, Mughal emperor
    Event: Sambhaji paraded on a camel with bells for forty days before execution

    - Sambhaji was captured at Sangameshwar on February 1, 1689, while moving to evade a tightening Mughal encirclement.
    - He was paraded through Mughal camps on a camel wearing a fool’s cap hung with bells so soldiers could see what defiance cost.
    - The Shirkes sent daily reports of Sambhaji’s location to Mughal commanders, helping to tighten the net around him.
    - Sambhaji had sheltered Muhammad Akbar, Aurangzeb’s rebellious son, making his court a symbolic refuge against the emperor.
    - Two Mughal chroniclers recorded Aurangzeb stopping to offer a thanksgiving prayer when Sambhaji was presented in chains and blinded.

    To listen to this podcast ad-free and access premium episodes, try our subscription with a 14-day free trial at obomedia.com.

    © 2026 OBOMEDIA. All rights reserved.
    This episode and its content (audio, text, and related materials) are the exclusive property of OBOMEDIA and are protected by applicable copyright laws. Reproduction, distribution, editing, or commercial use, in whole or in part, without prior written permission from OBOMEDIA is prohibited. For permissions, licensing, and business inquiries: business@obomedia.com.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分