エピソード

  • Are We Living Through the Great Innovation Decline? (E216)
    2026/09/01
    Professor Olof Hallonsten argues that society has never talked more about innovation and entrepreneurship, yet bureaucracy, short-term thinking, risk aversion, and startup mythology may actually be making real innovation harder to achieve. Guest bio Olof Hallonsten is Professor of Socioeconomic Technology Studies at Lund University in Sweden and an expert on science, innovation, and research policy. He spent roughly 10–15 years studying innovation and research policy and has consulted for both the European Commission and the Swedish government. He is the author of Empty Innovation: Causes and Consequences of Society’s Obsession with Entrepreneurship and Growth, which challenges modern assumptions about innovation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Topics discussed “Empty innovation” vs. real innovation — why talking, spending, branding, and measuring innovation aren't the same as producing meaningful progress.The rise of managerialism and bureaucracy — how bureaucracy shifted from supporting scientists to increasingly controlling and measuring them.Risk aversion — why modern societies may have become more concerned with preventing technological risks than enabling experimentation.“Economization” — the growing tendency to evaluate education, science, health, and other areas primarily through economic returns.Short-term thinking vs. long-term discovery — major breakthroughs can take decades before their true value becomes apparent; the transistor is a central example.Declining entrepreneurship — whether entrepreneurship has become less attractive and less economically important despite being celebrated culturally.The myth of the entrepreneur — society focuses on Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg even though typical entrepreneurship is far more mundane and financially risky.“Entrepreneurship theater” — people learning to look and talk like entrepreneurs rather than actually building useful things.Problems with modern academia — grant chasing, peer review, publication metrics, career incentives, and administrative bureaucracy.AI hype — why we may simultaneously overestimate AI's short-term impact and underestimate its eventual long-term consequences.Not all innovation is good — technological progress can also produce nuclear weapons, destructive technologies, or potentially socially harmful automation.Government moonshots — why clearly defined goals such as an atomic bomb or COVID vaccine differ from sprawling challenges like climate change.How to restore real innovation — greater academic freedom, less formulaic evaluation, fewer grant-writing burdens, and more room for scientists to pursue uncertain long-term research. Main points Main point What Hallonsten argues 1. Innovation has become a buzzword Governments, universities and companies spend enormous amounts promoting “innovation,” but rhetoric shouldn't be confused with actual progress. 2. Real innovation is messy Genuine breakthroughs are uncertain, collaborative and often take decades to reveal their importance. 3. Bureaucracy isn't inherently bad Bureaucracy can enable discovery when it serves scientists; problems arise when administrators begin directing and controlling creative work. 4. Short-term metrics undermine discovery Demanding measurable impact today encourages researchers to promise immediate results rather than pursue uncertain discoveries whose value might emerge decades later. 5. Today's technology rests on old breakthroughs Much of the digital revolution ultimately rests on foundational technologies such as the transistor developed many decades ago. 6. Entrepreneurship has been romanticized The typical entrepreneur isn't Steve Jobs; most businesses are ordinary, difficult, risky ventures that don't produce extraordinary wealth. 7. We increasingly perform entrepreneurship Pitch competitions, branding, buzzwords and startup culture can reward people for appearing entrepreneurial rather than creating something genuinely valuable. 8. Politicians may promote innovation because they don't know how to create it Leaders know technological progress is necessary but cannot reliably manufacture breakthroughs, so visible innovation programs can substitute for actual results. 9. AI's biggest effects are unknowable today Major technologies often produce consequences their inventors never anticipated; judging AI's ultimate significance now is premature. 10. Give scientists more freedom Reduce short-term evaluations and grant bureaucracy and give researchers greater independence to pursue work whose payoff cannot be predicted. Overall takeaway We may have built an enormous system designed to produce, measure and advertise innovation that increasingly interferes with the unpredictable, long-term creative process through which genuine breakthroughs actually occur. Top 3 quotes 1. On entrepreneurship culture: “We are selling a lie to them.” Hallonsten argues that presenting exceptional figures like...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 11 分
  • The Rise & Fall of the Hot Girl Service Economy (E215)
    2026/08/25
    Swedish demographer and political candidate David Lorentzon explains his controversial theory of the “Hot Girl Service Economy”—how social media, global travel, gender-segregated careers and migration created female-centered economic ecosystems in places like Bali, Phuket, Dubai and Miami, and why he believes AI and economic disruption could bring them down. Guest bio David Lorentzon is a Swedish demographer, researcher and political candidate who studies migration, gender ratios, dating markets and demographic change. His research has focused particularly on separating migration statistics by gender, which led him to theories about mass female migration and what he calls the Hot Girl Service Economy. He is running for Sweden's parliament as a candidate for Alternative for Sweden (AfS), with personal policy interests including dating-app regulation and a modern debt jubilee. Lorentzon also holds U.S. citizenship through his American mother. Topics discussed The Hot Girl Service Economy and how it worksBali, Phuket, Dubai and Miami as female-centered economic hubsInstagram, OnlyFans, modeling and the influencer economyWhy social media accelerated this economy after roughly 2010Gender segregation in careers and geographyWomen moving toward cities and service-sector employmentMen clustering in rural, industrial and blue-collar regionsCollege education, student debt and career choicesDating, marriage, fertility and family formationAI-generated influencers and models replacing human creatorsWhether the Hot Girl Service Economy could collapseMarriage migration and “passport bros”Female migration from Southeast Asia, Latin America and Eastern EuropeMale-heavy versus female-heavy societiesDating apps and proposed regulationDebt and the case for a modern debt jubileeSweden's political system and cultureSweden's changing immigration policiesSwedish repatriation policiesSweden versus the United StatesPolitical polarization and national identity Main points 1. The Hot Girl Service Economy is bigger than influencers. Lorentzon describes an ecosystem where models and online creators bring money into places such as Bali and Dubai, then spend that money on businesses and services—fitness, beauty, wellness and other lifestyle industries—that often employ other women. 2. Social media provided the catalyst. He traces early versions of the phenomenon to international tourism in the 1980s and 1990s, but says it reached critical mass around 2010 and became much more established around 2016–17. 3. The broader thesis is about a gender-segregated economy. Lorentzon argues that young men and women increasingly work in different industries and therefore live in different places: men disproportionately gravitate toward industrial, agricultural and blue-collar work, while women concentrate in cities and service-oriented industries. 4. He believes this has demographic consequences. In his view, these geographic and occupational differences make dating, marriage and family formation harder because compatible men and women increasingly don't live and work in the same places. 5. AI could threaten the economic model. Lorentzon predicts businesses will increasingly substitute inexpensive AI-generated models and influencers for human ones, potentially removing some of the high-income jobs that feed money into the wider ecosystem. This is presented in the episode as his forecast, rather than an established outcome. 6. Marriage migration acts as another demographic balancing mechanism. His research argues that migration from Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe and parts of Latin America into Western countries is disproportionately female in some flows, partly because of international marriage. 7. Gender imbalance can hurt men as well. Lorentzon rejects the idea that simply having many more men necessarily produces a stronger economy, arguing that extreme male surpluses can eventually produce disengagement, lower productivity and social instability. 8. His political platform goes beyond demographics. As an AfS parliamentary candidate, Lorentzon discusses leaving NATO and the EU and supporting re-migration, while his personal priorities include restructuring dating-app incentives and implementing a modern debt jubilee. 9. He challenges the conventional American image of Sweden. Lorentzon argues that modern Sweden combines a large welfare state with socially restrictive policies and a highly entrepreneurial economy, making the country's politics harder to categorize on a simple American left-right spectrum. 10. Sweden becomes the episode's second major case study. The latter portion moves from gender and dating into immigration, national identity, political polarization and differences between Sweden and the United States. Top 3 quotes “We have basically created a gender-segregated economy, not just in the US, but on a global scale.” — David Lorentzon “The money is just circulating amongst each other. And that's the ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 54 分
  • What Europeans Get Wrong About America (E214)
    2026/08/18

    A German travel YouTuber shares how visiting America challenged nearly every stereotype she had about the United States—from friendliness and safety to healthcare, food, and quality of life—while comparing American culture with Europe and Asia.

    Guest Bio

    Cori Ander is a German travel YouTuber currently based in Thailand who has spent years exploring countries often misunderstood by the media. Her channel focuses on experiencing cultures firsthand, documenting life across Europe, the United States, China, Ukraine, Colombia, and beyond while challenging common stereotypes through on-the-ground travel.

    Topics Discussed
    • European stereotypes about the United States
    • American friendliness vs. European social norms
    • Florida vs. Seattle vs. Portland
    • American food, obesity, and restaurant culture
    • Tipping culture
    • Cars, highways, and public transportation
    • Germany's education system and perceptions of U.S. education
    • U.S. vs. German healthcare
    • Germany's taxes, bureaucracy, and demographic challenges
    • Guns, crime, and personal safety
    • Why she left Germany
    • America's national parks and wildlife
    • Spending habits and consumer culture
    • Differences between the U.S., Europe, Australia, China, Thailand, and Colombia
    • Where she would (and would not) live long-term.
    Main Points
    • Most European perceptions of America are shaped more by media than firsthand experience.
    • Americans were significantly friendlier than she expected, especially compared to Germany.
    • The U.S. is far more culturally diverse than Europeans often realize, with major regional differences.
    • America's natural beauty may be its most underrated feature, particularly its national parks and wildlife.
    • Germany's high taxes, bureaucracy, and declining affordability were major reasons she left.
    • Neither the American nor European healthcare systems are perfect, and each has important tradeoffs.
    • She generally felt safer in most parts of the U.S. than in Berlin, despite Europe's perception of American violence.
    • Traveling firsthand often overturns narratives created by traditional media.
    Top 3 Quotes
    1. "Americans are one of the friendliest nations I've ever met."
    2. "The nature in the United States is incredibly underrated."
    3. "I like visiting countries that are portrayed a certain way in the media so I can make my own picture."
    Overall Theme

    This conversation explores how travel replaces stereotypes with nuance, showing that many widely held beliefs about America, Europe, and other countries become far more complicated once experienced firsthand.

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 18 分
  • What Happened to Australia? A Warning for the Entire West (E213)
    2026/08/11

    Australian law professor Dr. Augusto Zimmermann argues that Western civilization is in rapid decline due to the erosion of free speech, the rule of law, mass migration, and the growing power of political and global institutions.

    Guest Bio

    Dr. Augusto Zimmermann is an Australian law professor, constitutional scholar, and author specializing in free speech, constitutional law, natural law, and Western civilization. Born in Brazil and living in Australia for more than 26 years, he has served as a law professor, Associate Dean, and Law Reform Commissioner. He is the co-author of The Battle for the Soul of Western Civilization and several books examining law, government, and political culture.

    Topics Discussed
    • Why Australia is rapidly declining
    • The future of Western civilization
    • Free speech and censorship
    • Australia's COVID lockdowns and mandates
    • Canada, France, and the UK compared
    • Immigration and demographic change
    • Universities and ideological capture
    • Rule of law vs. government power
    • Global institutions (UN, WHO, NGOs)
    • The future of Europe
    • Generation Z's political shift
    • Family, religion, and declining birth rates
    • The crisis in higher education
    • Electronic voting and democracy
    • How the West could reverse its decline
    Main Points
    • Australia has become significantly more authoritarian over the past two decades.
    • COVID accelerated government power and normalized restrictions on civil liberties.
    • Free speech is the foundation of a healthy democracy and is increasingly under threat.
    • Universities have shifted from education toward ideological indoctrination.
    • Mass immigration is creating major political, cultural, and housing pressures.
    • Political elites across Western nations increasingly pursue similar policies.
    • The rule of law depends as much on culture as it does on legal institutions.
    • Western civilization's greatest threat comes from internal political and cultural forces rather than external enemies.
    • Reforming institutions—not merely winning elections—is necessary to reverse decline.
    • Younger generations, particularly young men, may become the primary force pushing back against current political trends.
    Top 3 Quotes
    1. "The biggest threat to Western civilization is the threat within."
    2. "Bad law is no law at all."
    3. "The price of liberty is eternal vigilance." (Referenced while discussing Australia's trust in government.)

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 21 分
  • The Biggest Lies About American History (E212)
    2026/08/04

    Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul argues that many popular narratives about European colonialism are historically inaccurate, tracing their origins to ideological reinterpretations of history rather than the historical evidence itself.

    Guest Bio

    Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul is a professor of economics and global history at the Institute for History in the Netherlands. Originally from the United States, he earned his PhD from the University of Toronto and specializes in European, colonial, and economic history. He is the author of Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World and the forthcoming The Four Pillars of Western Civilization.

    Topics Discussed
    • Was America "stolen land"?
    • Christopher Columbus and the genocide debate
    • Smallpox blankets and historical myths
    • Indigenous warfare, slavery, and cannibalism
    • Howard Zinn and the rewriting of American history
    • Marxism's influence on universities
    • Academic groupthink and ideological conformity
    • Colonialism versus historical reality
    • Native American reparations and land claims
    • Democracy, the Founding Fathers, and the Iroquois Confederacy
    • Europe vs. America: culture, education, and prosperity
    • Immigration and the future of Western civilization
    • Why historical narratives matter today
    Main Points
    • Modern narratives about colonialism often conflict with the historical record.
    • Claims of widespread European genocide in the Americas are frequently exaggerated or oversimplified.
    • The "smallpox blankets" story has little historical evidence despite its popularity.
    • Indigenous societies also practiced warfare, slavery, and territorial conquest.
    • Much of today's historical revisionism stems from Marxist academic movements beginning in the 1970s.
    • Universities increasingly reward ideological conformity over open historical inquiry.
    • Western institutions—not race—are presented as the primary reason for modern prosperity.
    • Reparations and land acknowledgments often create incentives for political and financial activism.
    • Europe's current cultural debates increasingly mirror those that began in American universities.
    • Understanding history accurately is essential for preserving successful democratic institutions.
    Top Quotes
    1. "History actually happened—you can't replace facts with ideology forever."
    2. "People are simply grateful not to be gaslighted about history anymore."
    3. "You can't call yourself a scientist if your allegiance is to ideology before facts."
    4. "Everything European wasn't evil, and everything indigenous wasn't good."
    5. "The institutions that created the greatest prosperity in human history deserve to be defended, not dismantled."
    6. "Groupthink can survive for decades in the humanities because reality doesn't immediately prove it wrong."
    7. "The real story is far more complicated than the slogans."
    8. "Western civilization became successful because of its institutions—not because of ethnicity."
    9. "Most Europeans are more jealous of Americans than they're willing to admit."
    10. "People want history—not mythology."
    Misc. Podcast Info

    Guest: Professor Jeff Fynn-Paul
    Book: Not Stolen: The Truth About European Colonialism in the New World
    Upcoming Book: The Four Pillars of Western Civilization
    Duration: ~72 minutes
    Primary Themes: History, Colonialism, Western Civilization, Academia, Marxism, Immigration, Democracy, Culture, Revisionist History, Political Philosophy.

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 9 分
  • Everything You Know About Sleep Is Wrong (E211)
    2026/07/21

    Humans aren't suffering from a sleep epidemic—we're suffering from a circadian rhythm epidemic, and understanding the difference could transform how we think about sleep, health, and human evolution.

    Guest Bio

    Dr. David Samson is an Associate Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology at the University of Toronto, Director of the Sleep & Human Evolution Lab, and author of The Sleepless Ape. His research explores how sleep evolved, why humans sleep less than any other primate, and how modern environments have fundamentally changed our relationship with sleep and circadian rhythms.

    Topics Discussed
    • Why the "sleep epidemic" may be the wrong diagnosis
    • Hunter-gatherer vs. modern sleep patterns
    • The difference between sleep quality and circadian health
    • Why humans sleep less than any other primate
    • The evolutionary purpose of sleep
    • Why scientists still debate why we sleep
    • The myth of needing exactly eight hours
    • How fire transformed human sleep and evolution
    • The five biological rules that determine how much animals sleep
    • Why elephants sleep only two hours while bats sleep twenty
    • Evolutionary mismatch and modern sleep problems
    • The role of sunlight, temperature, and circadian rhythms
    • Why waking during the night may be perfectly normal
    • Why teenagers naturally stay up later
    • Dogs, fire, and the evolution of safer human sleep
    • How humans built a "sleep shell" that changed evolution
    • Could humans evolve to need even less sleep?
    • Practical strategies for improving sleep naturally
    Main Points
    • Modern societies actually sleep longer and more efficiently than hunter-gatherer societies.
    • The real modern problem is weakened circadian rhythms, not simply insufficient sleep.
    • The average human sleeps about 7 hours, not the commonly cited eight hours.
    • Humans evolved to become the shortest-sleeping primate, gaining more waking hours for learning, socializing, innovation, and cooperation.
    • Fire dramatically reshaped human evolution by reducing chewing time, extending waking hours, and creating safer sleeping environments.
    • Human sleep evolved alongside shelters, fire, social groups, and eventually dogs to create safer, more restorative sleep.
    • Most sleep advice should focus on strengthening circadian rhythms through natural light exposure rather than obsessing over sleep duration.
    • Evolution optimizes reproduction—not perfect health—creating tradeoffs between social life, survival, and optimal sleep.
    Best 3 Quotes

    "Humans are the shortest-sleeping primate on the planet. That's the paradox that changed everything I thought about sleep."

    "We've spent decades worrying about a sleep epidemic, when the real epidemic may be a circadian rhythm epidemic."

    "Evolution doesn't care if you live a long life. It cares that you survive, reproduce, and that your children reproduce."

    Misc. Podcast Info

    Guest: Dr. David Samson

    Title: Associate Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Toronto

    Books:

    • The Sleepless Ape: The Story of Sleep in Human Evolution
    • Our Tribal Future

    Key Research Findings

    • Industrial societies average 7.1 hours of sleep versus 6.4 hours in small-scale societies.
    • Sleep efficiency averages 88% in industrial societies versus 74% in small-scale societies.
    • Humans average approximately 6 hours 47 minutes of sleep globally (about 7 hours in practice).
    • Humans sleep less than every other known primate but possess one of the most successful evolutionary adaptations for survival.
    • Morning sunlight and strong circadian rhythms may be more important than chasing eight hours of sleep.

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間 9 分
  • I Asked a Mexico Real Estate Expert About Retiring in Mexico (E210)
    2026/07/15

    Guest Bio

    Greg Gunter is the Founder and Broker/Owner of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Mexico. A 17-year resident of San Miguel de Allende, he specializes in helping Americans and Canadians relocate, retire, and invest in one of Mexico's most popular expat destinations.

    Topics Discussed
    • Why Americans are retiring in Mexico
    • San Miguel de Allende vs. beach destinations
    • Cost of living and purchasing power
    • The "Four C's": Cost, Climate, Culture & Community
    • Renting before buying
    • Buying property as a foreigner
    • Coast vs. inland property ownership
    • Safety, crime and cartel misconceptions
    • Healthcare and Medicare in Mexico
    • Residency and visa requirements
    • Bringing pets across the border
    • Investment properties and rental income
    • Real estate appreciation in San Miguel
    • Why retirees move back to the U.S.
    • Common mistakes first-time buyers make
    Main Points
    • San Miguel offers a spring-like climate year-round without the humidity of coastal Mexico.
    • The city combines lower living costs with a vibrant cultural scene and a large English-speaking expat community.
    • Foreigners can own property directly (fee simple) in central Mexico, unlike many coastal areas that require a bank trust.
    • Most buyers are Americans purchasing second homes for retirement or seasonal living.
    • Healthcare is high quality and significantly less expensive than in the U.S.
    • Property taxes, utilities, and household help are dramatically cheaper than in the United States.
    • Greg recommends renting in different neighborhoods before buying to find the best fit.
    • Safety concerns about Mexico are often generalized; San Miguel has a longstanding reputation as one of the country's safest cities.
    • Many retirees eventually return to the U.S. primarily because of grandchildren or age-related health needs.
    • Long-term appreciation and lifestyle are often bigger draws than rental income alone.
    Top 3 Quotes

    "We always talk about the four C's: cost, climate, culture, and community."

    "I'm selling the lifestyle down here—it's not really sticks and bricks."

    "They're going to carry me out in an urn. I'm never leaving."

    How to Find Greg
    • Website: Dream Pro Homes Luxury – dreamprohomesluxury.com
    • Email: greg@gregorygunter.com
    • Phone: +1 (877) 878-4141
    • Company: Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Mexico (San Miguel de Allende)

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 時間
  • Britain's Collapse Is Happening Faster Than You Think (E209)
    2026/07/07

    Dr. Ben Jones explains how mass migration, multiculturalism, and declining free speech are reshaping Britain—and why he believes the country's future is at a turning point.

    Guest Bio
    Dr. Ben Jones is Case Management Director at the Free Speech Union and author of Island of Strangers, where he examines how mass migration, multiculturalism, and restrictions on free expression are reshaping Britain and other Western democracies.

    Topics Discussed
    • Why Britain has "stopped being a society"
    • Mass migration and hyper-diversity
    • The decline of Christianity as Britain's social glue
    • Free speech and self-censorship in modern Britain
    • The role of the Free Speech Union
    • Police investigations over online speech
    • Arrests and prosecutions for social media posts
    • Two-tier policing claims
    • Immigration and demographic change
    • Islam, multiculturalism, and integration
    • The influence of American identity politics on Britain
    • Woke ideology and institutional capture
    • The trans rights debate and free speech
    • Historical comparisons with the Roman Empire
    • Britain's political future and civil unrest
    • Singapore's multicultural model
    • Elite decision-making and immigration policy
    • Solutions for Britain's future
    Main Points
    • Britain has shifted from a culturally unified nation into what Jones describes as "a nation of strangers."
    • Large-scale immigration combined with declining national identity has weakened social cohesion.
    • Free speech restrictions have expanded significantly, with growing numbers of people investigated or disciplined over lawful opinions.
    • Institutions increasingly prioritize social harmony and identity politics over traditional liberal freedoms.
    • Jones argues multicultural societies naturally create more speech restrictions because governments attempt to manage competing cultural sensitivities.
    • Britain has moved from encouraging assimilation toward accepting permanent parallel communities.
    • Political elites have largely ignored public concerns over immigration despite repeated electoral signals.
    • Demographic change, according to Jones, will continue reshaping Britain even if immigration stopped immediately.
    • Unless major political changes occur, he believes Britain faces increasing instability during the coming decade.
    • Despite his pessimism, Jones encourages citizens to remain engaged and continue defending liberal democratic values.
    Top 3 Quotes
    1. "Britain has become a nation populated by strangers."
    2. "We've gone from a society where you knew what you couldn't say to one where every conversation feels like walking through a minefield."
    3. "Keep buggering on. Don't give up." — quoting Winston

    🎙 The Pod is hosted by Jesse Wright
    💬 For guest suggestions, questions, or media inquiries, reach out at https://elpodcast.media/
    📬 Never miss an episode – subscribe and follow wherever you get your podcasts.
    ⭐️ If you enjoyed this episode, please rate and review the show. It helps others find us.

    Thanks for listening!

    続きを読む 一部表示
    59 分