E9. Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Disclaimer:
This episode was generated using AI narration via Google Notebook LM. It is based on and produced from the full article published on the Echoes of Learning and Teaching Substack.
🎧 Episode 9: “Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning”
In this episode of Echoes of Learning and Teaching, we take a closer look at a practice often celebrated in higher education — curriculum mapping — and ask whether alignment truly equals learning. Drawing on the Substack post “Beyond the Tick Box: Why Curriculum Mapping Isn’t Evidence of Learning”, we question if our neatly aligned frameworks are giving us a false sense of assurance.
We’ll explore questions like:
- When do students actually demonstrate the course learning outcomes that define their degree?
- Are we mistaking mapped alignment for authentic evidence of learning?
- What would it mean to move from tick-box compliance to meaningful demonstration — from mapping to meaning?
Join us as we unpack how curriculum design can go beyond coherence on paper and toward coherence in practice — where the assurance of learning isn’t found in spreadsheets, but in what students can do, create, and articulate as graduates.
🔗 Read the original post here: https://open.substack.com/pub/echoesoflearningandteaching/p/beyond-the-tick-box-why-curriculum
💭 Want to explore more reflections on teaching and learning?
Read all the articles featured in this podcast on the Echoes of Learning and Teaching blog
There is also a curated collection on Flipboard