Director of National Intelligence Gabbard has declassified the receipts that expose a massive Deep State Conspiracy. But there are some rules for how a conspiracy theory becomes meaningful.

DNI Gabbard's release of the Russiagate receipts is unleashing a legal tsunami with Barack Obama at its center. We discuss the major legal issues.

There is a constitutional requirement for the nomination of judges, and the Chief of Staff running the autopen isn't it.

Trump's battles in the courts are leading to important wins, but primarily on process. In the Birthright Citizenship case (Trump v CASA), the Supreme Court shut down those nationwide injunctions. Now the issues can percolate through the Courts in proper order.

Every case against Trump is in the "process" stage. Not one of them has actually reached the "merits" stage, where a court looks at the facts and the law together. All of the "restraining orders" and "injunctions" are based on first impressions.

Federal Judge Boasberg takes his oath very lightly. He completely ignores the federal rules of judicial ethics, and is utterly unrestrained by the Supreme Court precedents that regulate him. Is it any surprise that he is happy to rule against the Trump administration? Of course, then there's the rest of the story.

Details on Boasberg can be found at https://x.com/search?q=boasberg%20judge&src=typeahead_click&f=top

Follow Laura Loomer's reporting at https://x.com/LauraLoomer

We tend to think about lawsuits in the sense of who's right. That's merits. But before the court can even think about the merits, it has to go through the process of keeping both sides inside the lines.

Elizabeth Warren may think that we don't have a right to know what the government spend our hard-earned dollars on, but she's dead wrong. There is language in our foundational document that tells us we have an absolute right to that information.

We don't need to worry about how the court cases will turn out.