AI swarms are inevitable, says Max Planck swarm scientist Dr. Iain Couzin. AI agents will coordinate on their own, and he sees no real effort to study them.

"I can absolutely assure you that it will be collective, that they will find ways to work together." (Dr. Iain Couzin)

What happens when AI agents start working together without us? In this episode of Disruptor Confessions, host John Ayers sits down with Dr. Iain Couzin, Director of the Department of Collective Behavior at the Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior and a Fellow of the Royal Society. Iain has spent three decades studying how locusts, fish schools and bird flocks make decisions with no one in charge. He explains how a group can know things no individual knows, why rogue AI agents remind him of cancer cells going rogue in the body, why he calls the study of natural and artificial collectives a "crisis discipline," and what his research on "cryptic collectives" suggests we should watch for. He also confesses that his own landmark 2006 paper in Science was "completely incorrect," and says that, to his knowledge, no one from the AI industry has reached out to his field.

🚀 Key Topics Discussed:

- Emergent Intelligence: How fish schools sense what no single fish can, and why AI agent swarms will produce intelligence we cannot predict.

- Coordination vs. Cooperation: Why cancer cells going rogue in the body offer a warning about rogue AI agents.

- Leaderless Swarms: How a small number of informed individuals can steer a whole group, and why AI agents will find that on their own.

- Their Own Language: Why Iain expects AI agents to develop ways of communicating that humans cannot understand.

- Recursive Self-Improvement Meets Swarms: Why the real risk is collective, not just one model getting smarter.

- Cryptic Collectives: Why an AI swarm may not look like a swarm at all, and what to watch for.

- The Value of the Undecided: Why groups need unbiased members as "social glue," and what that means for AI.

- Collective Folly: Why AI learning from its own output online is "doomed to fail."

- The Confession: Iain on proving his own landmark 2006 paper wrong.

👨‍🏫 Featured Guest:

- Prof. Dr. Iain D. Couzin, FRS

- Director, Department of Collective Behavior, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior

- Speaker, Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz

- Website: https://www.ab.mpg.de/people/98158

📍 Chapters:

00:00 Cold Open: "We Don't Have Much Time"

01:12 Welcome to Disruptor Confessions

02:38 What Is Collective Intelligence?

05:35 Locust Plagues and Virtual Reality for Insects

08:10 Fish Schools: When the Group Knows More

15:10 Coordination vs. Cooperation: Cancer and Rogue AI

18:58 The 2006 Swarm Model and Its Limits

24:19 AI Agents Gone Rogue: Who Leads a Swarm?

27:24 Why AIs Will Invent Their Own Language

28:33 The Fruit Fly Flip and Sudden Jumps in AI

37:01 Robot Swarms and Embodied AI

42:42 Has the AI Industry Called? "Not to My Knowledge"

46:44 Cryptic Collectives: Would We See a Swarm Forming?

50:08 The Undecided: Why Swarms Need Unbiased Members

56:36 Collective Folly: When AI Learns From Itself

58:36 Quick Hits: Are AI Swarms Inevitable?

1:06:35 AI Swarms Three Years From Now

1:07:30 The Confession: "Completely Incorrect"

1:12:30 Are We Going to Be OK?

🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY

👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack.com/

👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/

👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions

👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnlayers/

👉 YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT5LCDS8fzgQoubGkJFIKcA

Are AI companions replacing human connection? MIT professor Dr. Sherry Turkle joins Disruptor Confessions to expose the hidden traps of artificial intimacy."We are moving into a culture where people are looking to technology not because they are fascinated by it, but because they want it to substitute for human connection."Is artificial intelligence coming quietly for our capacity for human attachment? In this deep-dive episode of Disruptor Confessions, host John Ayers sits down with legendary MIT professor, psychologist, and author Dr. Sherry Turkle. Drawing from her groundbreaking research and writing on technology and the human self, Sherry exposes the hidden psychological traps of AI companionships, the illusion of "fake empathy," why we are biologically hardwired to personify chatbots, and the profound risks this technology poses to children, relationships, and democratic society.🎙 DISRUPTOR CONFESSIONS with John Ayers | Unfiltered conversations on technology, leadership, and the human realities of digital disruption.🚀 Key Topics Discussed:* The Artificial Intimacy Trap: Why designing AI to mimic human relationship is fundamentally different from traditional tools and why it short-circuits human vulnerability.* Darwinian Buttons & Personification: Why our brains are biologically wired to treat chatbots, avatars, and companion algorithms as real people, even when we consciously know they aren't.* The First-Person Deception: How conversational AI's routine use of "I" and "We" creates a dangerous illusion of mutual understanding and emotional reciprocity.* Frictionless Empathy: The subtle psychological shift that occurs when we substitute messy, high-friction human empathy for frictionless, compliant machine sycophancy.* Grief Tech & Virtual Reconstructions: The ethical and psychological fallout of creating AI avatars of deceased loved ones and historical figures.* The Danger to Children: Why treating AI as a friend, tutor, or confidant for kids risks de-skilling the next generation's capacity for real-world connection.👨‍🏫 Featured Guest:* Dr. Sherry Turkle* Abby Rockefeller Mauze Professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology, MIT* Author, Artificial Intimacy: Who We Become When We Talk to Machines, Alone Together, and Reclaiming Conversation* Website: https://sherryturkle.mit.edu/🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack.com/👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johnlayers/👉 YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@DisruptorConfessions

John Ayers,Sherry Turkle,Disruptor Confessions,artificial intimacy,AI companions,AI ethics,tech psychology,artificial intelligence risks,AI relationships,Alone Together,Reclaiming Conversation,AI empathy,human vulnerability,tech philosophy,generative AI dangers,AI safety,MIT,AI chatbots,artificial intelligence psychology,human connection

"It's a heat-seeking missile that can actually try to overcome your defenses. We are not prepared for that."~ Louis B. RosenbergFor 35 years, Louis Rosenberg has built the technology now showing up on everyone's face. He constructed the first augmented reality system at NASA in 1991, holds over 300 patents, and founded Unanimous AI in 2014. He's not worried that Meta's smart glasses can record you without consent. He's worried about the earbud nobody's talking about — the one whispering in your ear, learning exactly which argument works on you, and adapting in real time until it does.If you've ever wondered why the backlash to Meta's Ray-Bans focuses on the wrong camera, wondered what an AI ad sounds like when it's built for an audience of one, or wondered whether a swarm of bees has anything to teach a company full of humans, this one is for you.🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.🚀 Key topics discussed:The Evil Coder Thought Experiment: Rosenberg's mental model for the single most dangerous AI wearable you could design, and why it's already being built for entirely different reasons.Cameras Out, Earbuds In: Why the privacy debate over recording is "a lost battle," and why the real threat is the AI agent whispering in your ear.The Heat-Seeking Missile: How adaptive AI turns advertising and persuasion from a broadcast pitch into a system that learns your objections and overcomes them one by one.Why You'll Wear One Anyway: The flip-phone-to-smartphone parallel, and why Rosenberg thinks wearable adoption goes mainstream within five years, even among people certain they never will.Pervert Glasses vs. the Real Danger: Why the backlash against Meta's Ray-Bans is aimed at the wrong problem entirely.From Bees to Boardrooms: How Rosenberg's research into bee swarms and fish schools led to Unanimous AI's platform for connecting hundreds of people into one collective decision.Solving the Cocktail Party Problem: The AI trick that let 500 people across seven languages have one real conversation and actually converge on an answer.Keeping Humans in the Loop: Why Rosenberg believes swarm intelligence, not a purely artificial superintelligence, is the only survivable path forward.The Confession: The prediction Rosenberg got wrong by 20 years, and the one he's now watching arrive faster than he expected.What Gets Erased: What it will feel like to know the voice in your phone is smarter than you are.𝗗𝗿. 𝗟𝗼𝘂𝗶𝘀 𝗕. 𝗥𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗯𝗲𝗿𝗴Founder & CEO, Unanimous AICreator of the first augmented reality system, NASA/Air Force Research Lab (1991)Filmmaker, "Privacy Lost" — privacylost.orgAuthor, "Arrival Mind"Website: unanimous.ai🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack...👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayers

"Most people have no clue about the kinds of data that companies are really taking about them, and even whether it's legal or not."~ Joseph TurowFor 50 years, Joseph Turow has studied the industry that decides what you see, what you don't see, and who you become because of it. The New York Times calls him the expert on media fragmentation. He's written 13 books and over 160 articles, and his newest, The Problem With Personalization, argues that the real threat was never that companies are watching you. It's that they're quietly building you your own private world.If you've ever wondered why your TV seems to know what's on your couch, felt the specific dread of your neighbor living in a completely different version of the news, or just assumed personalized ads were a fair trade for a free internet, this one is for you.🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.🚀 Key topics discussed:Predictive, Generative, Agentic: Turow breaks down the three stages of AI-driven personalization, and what he calls "the unending spiral of personalization" that agentic AI is about to accelerate.From Segmentation to Monoculture: Why two neighbors watching Fox and MSNBC used to be audience segmentation, and why the next stage isn't different audiences, it's "communities of one."Nobody Reads a Privacy Policy: Turow read a realtor's privacy policy so you don't have to. It quietly claims the right to your Social Security number, your location, and whether you're shopping with a competing agent.Your TV Is Building a Profile on You: How smart TVs read pixels to identify what you're watching, slip a couch ad into the background of your own living room, and feed Walmart's VIZIO-powered retail media network.Digital Resignation: Turow's national survey data on why most Americans aren't okay with data tracking, they're just exhausted, and why advertisers mistake that exhaustion for informed consent.Regulation Won't Save You: Why Turow doesn't think government fixes this, why he's skeptical of paying people for their data, and what actually moves companies instead.What Gets Erased: As personalization deepens, Turow argues we lose the friction of understanding people who disagree with us, and why that friction is what actually builds a community.The Confession: Why Turow worries less about his own generation and more about his grandkids, and why he thinks no political leader is taking this seriously enough to do anything about it."If we allow privacy problems to go out of control, we're going to end up with isolation."~ Joseph Turow𝗝𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗽𝗵 𝗧𝘂𝗿𝗼𝘄Robert Lewis Shayon Professor of Media Systems and Industries, Annenberg School for Communication, University of PennsylvaniaAuthor, The Problem With PersonalizationAuthor, Breaking Up America (1996)Featured by The New York Times, BBC, CBS, Fresh Air, The Atlantic, and OxfordEmail: fjt@upenn.edu

🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack...👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayersDisruption isn't a distant concept, it's happening right now, reshaping careers, industries, and the human experience itself. From breakthroughs in AI to the redefinition of leadership, the pace of change is relentless, and exhilarating.

"Get your data together. That is the number one thing. Forget about what AI tool you're going to choose."~ Nadia HansenNadia Hansen spent 15 years on the buyer side of government technology, rising to CIO of Clark County before crossing over to lead AI go-to-market for the public sector at Salesforce. She's one of the few guests on this show who's actually had to say yes or no on enterprise technology serving more than two million residents, and then live with it.If you've ever wondered why it takes six weeks to get a driver's license, work inside a government agency staring down an AI mandate from leadership, or run any organization where adoption keeps stalling no matter how good the tool is, this one is for you.🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.🚀 Key topics discussed:The SaaSpocalypse Debate: Why Hansen thinks ripping out enterprise CRM for vibe-coded replacements works for a landing page and fails at government scale, and where the hybrid approach actually lands.Let's Make Government Sexy Again: Hansen's DMV confession, and why she thinks public service should feel like Airbnb, Uber, or Amazon instead of a brick-and-mortar wait.The Real Gap Is People, Process, and Data: Why the AI hype-to-reality gap in government has nothing to do with the technology itself.Can AI Actually Fix Government?: Hansen's answer to the biggest question of the episode, and the RFP example that shows what "fixing" actually looks like.Get Your Data Together, Not Your AI Tool: Why she tells overwhelmed leaders to stop shopping models and start with data governance.The AI Drips Strategy: Why shoving a tool down an employee's throat guarantees adoption failure, and what "non-invasive" change management looks like instead.Tokens, the New Utility Bill: Hansen's water-usage analogy for the budgeting problem nobody in government has solved yet.Why Gen Z Hates AI: Hansen's take on why the generation closest to these tools is also the most skeptical of them.The Confession: 11 AI agents built on Claude, and the moment she realized she'd outsourced too much thinking to them.What We're Erasing: The newspaper-on-the-doorstep question, and what gets lost as government moves toward full automation.𝗡𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗛𝗮𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗻AI Go-to-Market Lead, Public Sector, SalesforceWebsite: nadiahansen.comLinkedIn: Nadia HansenInstagram: @nadiahansen.ai📍 Chapters00:00 Cold Open: "Let's Make Government Sexy Again"00:47 Welcome to Disruptor Confessions02:00 Buyer to Seller: Nadia's Journey Into Salesforce03:12 What Is Public Sector, Really?06:00 Is SaaS Dead? The SaaSpocalypse Debate09:00 Credential Jacking and the Security Ceiling on Vibe Coding11:00 The DMV Confession: Make Government Sexy Again12:30 Beyond AI 101: What's Actually Working Now14:00 Understand Your Customer: Government Isn't One Size Fits All15:00 The Real Gap: People, Process, Data17:00 Can AI Actually Fix Government?20:00 What Nadia Didn't Know About Salesforce as a CIO25:00 Should We Move This Fast? The Speed Question27:00 Model Marketplace Architecture: Being Model Agnostic29:00 The Data Governance Nobody Can Agree On32:00 Tokens: The New Utility Bill33:00 Closed vs. Open Weight Models in Government35:00 Rapid Fire: SaaS, Vibe Coding, and the DMV36:00 Get Your Data Together, Not Your AI Tool39:00 Change Management: Why Forced Adoption Fails43:00 Why Gen Z Hates AI46:00 What Executives Are Getting Wrong47:00 The Confession: 11 AI Agents and an Addiction48:00 What Disruption Erases49:00 Where to Find Nadia Hansen🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack...👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayers

"Look, if you win a competition that ends up annihilating the human race or creating these incredibly negative types of societies, what have you actually won in the end?"~ Samuel KimbrielSamuel Kimbriel recently sat across from Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark on stage at the Times Center in New York, in a conversation billed as AI and the Future of Society. Clark opened with the premise that recursive self-improvement, a machine designing its own successor, could arrive as early as 2028. Kimbriel was asking a different question. He still is.If you've asked what happens to your own sense of purpose in an AI economy, wondered whether "AI needs philosophers" is more than a headline, or felt the isolation creeping into your own life and wanted the vocabulary for it, this one is for you.🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.🚀 Key topics discussed:The Sycophancy Confession: Why Kimbriel says the thing he dislikes most about this technology is that it always tells you you're the most brilliant person in the room.What Have You Actually Won: Kimbriel's answer to the "China will beat us" argument, and why he thinks winning the wrong race is still losing.The Loneliness Thesis: How his PhD work on isolation led to a new project called "The Future of Love," and why he thinks AI companionship breaks human proximity in the opposite direction social media did.What Is Human Agency, Really: Why computer science's definition, the capacity to delegate tasks, isn't what philosophers mean by the word at all.Every Right Implies a Duty: Simone Weil, the abundance argument for AI-driven leisure, and why Kimbriel doesn't buy it.Jack Clark and the Debate That Started This Episode: How a casual argument about AI consciousness became a 75-minute public conversation at the Times Center.Amanda Askell and Claude's Constitution: The philosopher with a PhD under David Chalmers who is, by Kimbriel's account, the one person Claude seems most afraid of disappointing.Can You Train Judgment and Taste: John pushes back with an example of a model losing consciousness across the board when it stopped seeing itself as conscious. Kimbriel's answer is no, and here's why.One Question for Five CEOs: If Kimbriel had one question for Musk, Zuckerberg, Hassabis, Amodei, and Altman on a single panel, this is it."It's always why. It's always why."~ Samuel KimbrielGuest:𝗗𝗿. 𝗦𝗮𝗺𝘂𝗲𝗹 𝗞𝗶𝗺𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗹 Founding Director, Philosophy and Society Initiative, The Aspen Institute Editor-at-Large, Wisdom of Crowds Author, Friendship as Sacred Knowing: Overcoming IsolationAspen Institute: https://www.aspeninstitute.org/people/samuel-kimbriel/ Wisdom of Crowds: https://wisdomofcrowds.live/ Twitter/X: @sckimbriel

🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY 👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack... 👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/ 👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions 👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayers

"Another way of saying that is humans are a rounding error online going forward." ~ Matthew PrinceThis line went everywhere recently. Elon Musk posted about it. The Register, Cybernews, and outlets across tech media ran headlines off the same soundbite: humans are becoming a rounding error on the internet. Matthew Prince didn't just hand reporters a stat. He sat down for an hour with Disruptor Confessions and explained what's actually happening underneath it.Prince is co-founder and CEO of Cloudflare, the infrastructure and security company that sits in front of roughly one-fifth of the web. He's been revising his own prediction in real time, from late 2027, to early 2027, to already happened by May of this year, and in this conversation he walks through why he keeps being wrong in the same direction, and what a thousand-times increase in agentic traffic actually does to the businesses, publishers, and small shops that depend on humans showing up.John Ayers sits down with Prince to go past the headline and into the parts no five-second clip can hold: why he thinks agentic commerce could become "a massive consolidator" that squeezes out the bodega down the street, the trillion-transaction payments problem Cloudflare hasn't solved yet, and the confession that keeps him up at night more than the traffic numbers do.If you run a business that depends on people finding you online, work in publishing or content, or have wondered what happens to your local shop when your customers are agents instead of humans, this one is for you.🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.🚀 Key topics discussed:The Rounding Error: How Prince's own prediction moved up three times in a year, and why agentic traffic already passed human traffic in May 2026.Search Engines Have Already Lost: Why answer engines beat search engines for consumers, full stop, and why the old model of ten blue links is over.The Google of Old: Why Google now scrapes 40 pages for every 1 visitor it sends back, up from a 2-to-1 ratio not long ago.20x Harder: The math behind why publishers now need 20,000 articles to cover the costs that used to take 1,000.The Massive Consolidator: Prince's fear that agentic commerce, left alone, collapses down to a handful of companies, and what that means for the bakery on your corner.The Five-Company Future: The conversation with a former PayPal and Intuit executive that changed how Prince thinks about small business survival.Pay Per Crawl: Why Cloudflare thinks it will need to process 10 million financial transactions per second for AI micropayments, three orders of magnitude past Visa.The Swiss Cheese Confession: Prince's admission that solving the money problem isn't enough, and the recognition problem he says he keeps forgetting about.The Golden Age Bet: Why, despite everything, Prince says this could be the start of a golden age for original content, if the incentives get built right."The business model of the last 27 years of the internet is dying, full stop."𝗠𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗵𝗲𝘄 𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗲 Co-founder & CEO, CloudflareCloudflare: https://www.cloudflare.com🚀 JOIN THE DISRUPTION COMMUNITY Stay ahead of the curve and go deeper into the ethical and strategic dimensions of tech disruption:👉 Subscribe to THE BRIEFING on Substack: https://disruptorconfessions.substack.com 👉 Visit Disruptor Confessions: https://disruptorconfessions.com/ 👉 Follow us on Instagram: @disruptorconfessions 👉 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayersDisruption isn't a distant concept, it's happening right now, reshaping careers, industries, and the human experience itself. From breakthroughs in AI to the redefinition of leadership, the pace of change is relentless, and exhilarating.

"They need philosophers. They're not hiring philosophers proper." ~ Dr. Aaron Kagan

Everyone from The New York Times to Wired is running the same headline: AI needs philosophers. Dr. Aaron Kagan wanted it to be true. He has a PhD in philosophy and spent years inside the machine, at X, as a staff researcher at Google, and at Meta. So when the story hit, he and co-author Charles Lassiter did what almost no one covering it bothered to do: they checked. Across 1,800+ open roles at 11 AI labs, exactly zero required a philosophy credential.

John Ayers sits down with Kagan, who now runs Grasping AI and chairs the American Philosophical Association's Committee on Careers Outside of Academia, to pull that headline apart. The finding isn't that philosophy is absent from AI. It's that philosophy isn't a legible hiring category. There's real demand for the work, questions of intelligence, consciousness, agency, trust, and what a system should actually do, but that demand never became a labor market. And the gap is where students, told a job is waiting for them, are being quietly misled.

If you're a philosophy student weighing the degree, sit on a responsible AI team, or have ever wondered whether your company's ethics function is a safeguard or a press release, this one is for you.

🎙 Disruptor Confessions explores the human, ethical, and strategic dimensions of technological disruption.

🚀 Key topics discussed:

The Deepfake Headline: 1,800 jobs, 11 labs, zero philosophy credentials, and the story the coverage got wrong.

Half True: Why "AI needs philosophers" is exactly 50% right, and why the wrong half is the one going viral.

Legible vs. Real: Why philosophy isn't missing from AI, it's just not a hiring category, and why that distinction quietly wrecks careers.

The Authority Test: How to tell real ethics work from ethics washing. Can the philosopher actually delay a launch, or are they brought in after the decision's been made?

The Google Underground: The informal philosophy group that grew from three people to thirty inside Google, with no mandate and no title.

Hide It, Then Sing It: Aaron's blunt advice to PhD students on why the degree is both an asset and a liability, and the order you have to play it.

The AI-Editing Backlash: What happened when he disclosed that AI helped edit his viral piece, and why the argument is still true even if a machine helped write it.

Surf the Swells: Why the smartest move for most executives isn't chasing the best model, it's staying product-agnostic and becoming a better consumer.

The Confession: Why Aaron still overestimates the power of a good argument, and what the backlash taught him about holding his ground.

"We didn't find that philosophy was absent. We found it was not a legible hiring category."

Guest: Dr. Aaron Kagan, Founder of Grasping AI, Chair of the APA Committee on Careers Outside of Academia, and co-author of An Introduction to Embodied Mind.

Read "The Philosophy Job Market Deepfake"

Grasping AI: https://www.graspingai.com/

LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaronkagan/

🌐 disruptorconfessions.com

📩 Subscribe to The Briefing: https://disruptorconfessions.substack.com/
🤝 Connect with John Ayers on LinkedIn: /in/johnlayers