エピソード

  • Deciphering the Libertarian Party's Position on Abortion: Key Points Unpacked
    2024/04/01

    The Libertarian Party removed its abortion plank in 2022, ending fifty years of failed attempts to articulate a consistent position on women's and children's rights. This episode traces that history — from the LP's first platform in 1972 through the debates that led to removal — and examines what the change does and doesn't mean. Removing the plank doesn't make the LP officially pro-life, and it doesn't abandon the party's principles on women's rights. It reflects what has always been true: libertarians are genuinely divided on abortion. The deeper question — whether abortion constitutes a rights violation under the non-aggression principle — remains unresolved, and that is the debate libertarian philosophers now have to face.

    Main Points of Discussion 00:00Introduction: Is the LP pro-choice? What the platform's silence means05:30The LP's abortion plank from 1972 through 2000: a history of failed attempts06:44Division within the LP: the long-standing split on abortion08:45The case for removal: neutrality, consistency, and avoiding infighting11:02The Dallas Accord and the "big tent" argument14:30Does silence on abortion threaten the rights of women?18:43What other LP platform sections say about individual rights and government intervention20:30Core libertarian values that remain in the platform after removal23:02Why removal was a move toward consistency, not abandonment of principle23:45The unresolved philosophical task: reconciling women's and fetal rights under the NAP

    続きを読む 一部表示
    26 分
  • Nancy Pearcey Explains The Toxic War on Masculinity
    2024/03/04

    | SUMMARY - Nancy Pearcey Explains The Toxic War on Masculinity |

    TIP JAR: https://donate.stripe.com/aEUdUE5YodhZgkUeUV

    In this episode of Dare to Think, Kerry Baldwin interviews Professor Nancy Pearcey about her book, The Toxic War on Masculinity. This book is not intended to take sides in cultural-religious debate between Complementarianism and Egalitarianism.

    Instead, Pearcey examines a socio-historical perspective of the phenomenon known as "toxic masculinity" and whether Christianity or secularism is responsible for it. Pearcey finds a number of surprising examples throughout history, and also today from prominent sociological and psychological marriage researchers. Pearcey's book is more of an academic apologetic written for educated layman, instead of a popular piece.

    Join me, Kerry Baldwin, with Nancy Pearcey, as we Dare to Think about the Toxic War on Masculinity

    Read my review of Pearcey's book at https://mereliberty.com/041

    | MAIN POINTS OF DISCUSSION |

    00:00 Introduction

    01:20 What is the main problem the book is trying to solve?

    04:47 What has been the cause for controversy surrounding the book?

    09:01 The "Good" man versus "Real" man scripts

    12:13 The "Andrew Tate" phenomenon of masculinity & classical Christian schools

    14:09 How Christian men are absorbing the secular ("real man") script

    15:02 Research for Christian men splits into two different groups: devout versus nominal

    17:22 Brad Wilcox on Christian marriages

    19:57 Nominal Christian men marriage and divorce stats

    21:47 Percentage of nominal to devout Christian men is 50/50

    23:24 Fatherless boyhood: a problem of no-fault divorce or Industrialization?

    25:23 How did we lose involved fathers?

    27:50 Is there a way to flex the workplace so fathers are no longer absent from the family?

    29:02 The impact of fatherlessness hits boys harder than girls

    30:24 The impact of father substitutes

    31:44 How the 1950s model of the household cant possibly be the Biblical ideal

    33:28 Closing

    | RESOURCE LINKS |

    Follow Nancy Pearcey on Social Media

    • https://twitter.com/NancyRPearcey
    • https://www.facebook.com/NancyRPearceyAuthor

    Visit Nancy Pearcey's Website and purchase her book! (Preferred by author)

    • https://www.nancypearcey.com/

    Or on Amazon (Affiliate Support for Dare to Think Podcast)

    • https://amzn.to/3wzDPcX

    | SUPPORT DARE TO THINK |

    https://mereliberty.com/membership

    https://mereliberty.com/membership/courses LibertySeminar.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    36 分
  • Socratic Method and Critical Thinking - The Liberty Seminar
    2024/02/03
    The Socratic method, properly understood, is not a debate technique — it is a tool for inquiry-based discovery. Kerry Baldwin, Mike Leavitt, and Jacob Winograd discuss how this approach to critical thinking shapes the Liberty Seminar, an online course for learners aged 14 and older. Topics include the decline of careful reasoning in professional and academic settings, practical applications in parenting and theology, and why genuine learning requires the courage to question what you think you already know. Available in self-directed and Master Seminar formats at mereliberty.com. Main Points of Discussion: Socratic method and critical thinking 00:00Introduction01:06What is the Liberty Seminar and what is it trying to accomplish?02:20Who is the Liberty Seminar designed for?02:36What critical thinking is — and what it isn't04:15Self-directed and Master Seminar formats explained05:15The Socratic method as inquiry-based discovery, not debate06:02Is the Socratic method just about asking questions?07:38How strategic questions produce genuine learning08:14Why critical thinking is declining in professional settings10:13Understanding ideas before analyzing or critiquing them10:56If tests don't demonstrate learning, how do we know we're learning?11:59Why AI is not taking over reasoning12:46What you get from the Liberty Seminar16:12Real life application: non-academic trade skills17:42Real life application: parenting and communication with teens and adult children19:05Real life application: professional soft skills development19:26Real life application: studying doctrine and theology21:43Critical thinking as a defense against manipulation24:16Why courage is implied when you choose to think well27:29Objection: Christians who believe philosophy leads you away from truth32:56How Socratic practice has shaped Kerry's own thinking and research35:48How the Liberty Seminar serves intuitive thinkers and passion-driven learners Resource Links To get more information visit libertyseminar.com or https://mereliberty.com/membership/courses/ Original interviews: How Socratic Thinking Can Aid Christians in Faith and Politics, w/ Kerry BaldwinThinking Well and The Liberty Seminar with Kerry Baldwin FAQs 1. What is the Socratic method and how is it used in the Liberty Seminar? The Socratic method is a systematic approach to inquiry-based learning — a way of asking strategic questions to discover and examine ideas rather than simply receiving information. In the Liberty Seminar, Kerry Baldwin uses it not as a confrontational debate technique but as a tool for discovery: you learn to ask the right questions before you attempt to analyze or critique. The goal is understanding first. Argument follows from that, not the other way around. 2. What is the difference between critical thinking and debate? Debate assumes you already know what you think and want to defend it. Critical thinking — properly understood — is what you do before you're ready to debate anything. It is the disciplined work of understanding, conceptualizing, analyzing, and synthesizing ideas. You cannot argue well about what you do not yet understand. The Liberty Seminar teaches the prior skill: how to think through an idea carefully before staking out a position on it. 3. What is reflective thinking and how does it differ from conventional critical thinking? Reflective thinking is Kerry Baldwin's term for an approach to critical thinking that takes seriously the role of intuition, emotion, and felt experience in the reasoning process — not as noise to be eliminated, but as data to be examined. Most critical thinking curricula treat reasoning as purely adversarial: find the flaw, win the argument. Reflective thinking is non-adversarial. It asks: what am I actually responding to here, and why? That self-awareness is what makes the reasoning that follows more honest and more rigorous, not less. 4. Who is the Liberty Seminar designed for? The Liberty Seminar is designed for learners aged 14 and older — high school students and adults who want to develop genuine intellectual confidence. It is not an academic philosophy course, and it does not require any prior background in logic or critical thinking. It is for anyone who wants to think through hard questions carefully, engage disagreement without being threatened by it, and hold convictions honestly. The skills it teaches apply across every domain: professional life, theology, parenting, personal decision-making. 5. What are the practical applications of Socratic critical thinking? The applications are broader than most people expect. In professional settings, the ability to analyze problems clearly and communicate reasoning precisely is increasingly rare and increasingly valuable. In parenting, a Socratic approach means creating conditions for real dialogue with teenagers and adult children rather than defaulting to assertion. In theology, it means testing doctrine through honest scrutiny — a ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    40 分
  • DTTNM - Ep 39 What's Going on in New Mexico?
    2023/11/10

    TIP JAR: https://donate.stripe.com/aEUdUE5YodhZgkUeUV

    New Mexico is facing challenges in terms of violent crime, property crime, education, healthcare access, and economic stability. Despite being a "blue state," historically, Democrats in New Mexico have been pro-Second Amendment and have had few gun control laws. The majority of the population in New Mexico is Hispanic, with Nuevomexicanos being the result of intermarriage between Spanish or Mexican individuals and Native Americans. New Mexico has a complex history, including violent religious conquest and the intermarriage of Spanish and Native Americans. The majority of New Mexicans fall in the middle of the political spectrum and are ready for real change, as they are tired of the two-party duopoly.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • A First Person Perspective of the First Battle of Loc Ninh, Vietnam
    2023/04/04
    Summary - A First Person Perspective of the First Battle of Loc Ninh, Vietnam

    TIP JAR: https://donate.stripe.com/aEUdUE5YodhZgkUeUV

    mereliberty.com/038

    My father died a two weeks ago today, March 21st. It was expected, as he suffered for many years from COPD.

    In 2011, he composed a brief memoir. This was meant as catharsis for therapy we was receiving for PTSD he had suffered from his service in Vietnam. Prior to this, and for my whole life to this point, all we knew about my dad was that he had "shell shock" from time Vietnam - and so we didn't talk about it.

    In his memory, I've put that memoir to narration. Initially, this has been planned only for my family. But as I dug into his story a bit, I realized, that my father was part of a major battle that has historical significance. And so, with permission from my mother, I'm publishing it here for my listeners.

    I've snagged a description from Wikipedia about the battle and it's context. It reads:

    "The First Battle of Loc Ninh was a battle during the Vietnam War that occurred between 29 October and 7 November 1967, fought by the Viet Cong, Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), Civilian Irregular Defense Group (a military program developed by the CIA of South Vietnamese to counter Viet Cong), and the United States Army.

    The battle was part of the Operation Shenandoah II campaign.

    This battle represented the first time that North Vietnamese Communists (headquartered in South Vietnam) had coordinated attacks from different divisions, and was intended as "rehearsal" to experiment with urban-fighting techniques to be used for the Tet Offensive.

    Their operational goals were in part, to draw US and ARVN forces away from the cities in an upsurge of activity, in preparation for the Tet Offensive the next year.

    The Tet Offensive was a major escalation and one of the largest military campaigns of the Vietnam War.

    It was launched on January 30, 1968 by forces of the Viet Cong (VC) and North Vietnamese against the forces of the South Vietnamese Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), the United States Armed Forces and their allies.

    It was a campaign of surprise attacks against military and civilian command and control centers throughout South Vietnam.

    The name is the truncated version of the Lunar New Year festival name in Vietnamese, Tết Nguyên Đán, (tet win dawn) with the offense chosen during a holiday period as most ARVN personnel were on leave.

    The purpose of the wide-scale offensive by the Hanoi Politburo was to trigger political instability, in a belief that mass armed assault on urban centers would trigger defections and rebellions."

    The First Battle of Loc Ninh, instigated by the North Vietnamese against South Vietnamese and the US, resulted in what was considered an American and South Vietnamese victory.

    This is my father's recollection of that story.

    Main Points of Discussion 00:00Introduction04:06Part 1: David Baldwin enlists in the US Army11:34Part 2: David Baldwin deploys to Vietnam16:58Part 3: The battle and related skirmishes29:53Part 4: David Baldwin reassigned to An Loc34:30Part 5: David Baldwin returns rotates home37:54Part 6: Discharge and the beginning of a new life43:06Part 7: Postscript by Kerry Baldwin

    David B. Baldwin received the Bronze Star with Valor on February 27, 1968

    Resources Mentioned
    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Battle_of_Loc_Ninh
    • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tet_Offensive
    続きを読む 一部表示
    46 分
  • Exploring Foster Adoption with Doc Dixon
    2023/03/06
    Exploring Foster Adoption with Doc Dixon Doc Dixon and his wife Bethany wanted children. When that proved impossible through other means, they pursued foster adoption — and eventually raised six boys and a daughter. In this conversation, Doc walks through what that process actually looks like and what he wishes more people understood about it. Foster adoption begins with foster certification. There is no single path through the system, and prospective parents have more latitude than most assume — including the ability to specify criteria such as the age of the child. What the system requires, above all, is that parents understand their role. The legal and social services framework is navigated alongside caseworkers, and the goal at every stage is a permanent outcome for the child. Knowing that role — and working within it rather than against it — is what Doc identifies as the most important practical advice he can offer. A significant portion of the conversation addresses the hero narrative. Doc rejects it directly. He did not adopt because he wanted to be heroic; he adopted because he wanted children. He draws the contrast plainly: Superman does what he does because he wants to, not because he is performing sacrifice. Framing adoptive parents as heroes sets a bar that deters exactly the people who would be good at it — those who simply want a family and are willing to take the path available to them. Doc also addresses the common objection that you never know what you will get with an adopted child. Biological parents face the same uncertainty. The difference is the paperwork. He offers humorous observations about navigating public life as a conspicuously large family, and points to the support communities that exist for adoptive families — networks of people who have walked the same road and are willing to help others do the same. The conversation closes on the theological dimension. Doc's Reformed Christian faith shapes his understanding of parenthood directly: adoption, in his view, reflects the doctrine of God's adoption of believers. It is not an exceptional act but a natural one — a picture already embedded in the faith. Join me, Kerry Baldwin with Doc Dixon, as we Dare to Think about what it will take for women to choose life. Main Points of Discussion 00:00 Introduction 01:24 About Doc Dixon — Reformed libertarian, magician, and comedian 07:09 How Doc and Bethany came to foster adoption and their family today 08:35 The foster adoption process: certification, criteria, and what to expect 13:20 Navigating the legal and social services framework 14:06 "Know your role": working with caseworkers toward a permanent outcome 16:58 The struggles and challenges of foster adoption 18:14 Myth: "You never know what you'll get" with adopted children 23:45 What it's like being a large family in public 24:42 Rejecting the hero narrative: why adoptive parents aren't Superman or Batman 27:15 Support communities for prospective and current adoptive families 31:16 How Reformed Christian faith informs Doc's view of adoption and parenthood 32:55 Closing thoughts and how to connect with Doc Dixon Featured Guest Bio | Doc Dixon Doc Dixon. I'm a magician, comedian & speaker. From corporate events, trade shows, to resorts in Cancun & private events — even 2 shows at The White House, appearing on The Late Late Show with James Corden and FOOLING magic legends Penn & Teller on Penn & Teller:Fool Us — I bring a special mix of amazement and hilarity that makes events successful. I'm humbled to say, that's not just my opinion, but the opinion of my clients for the past 30 years from here in my home near Atlanta, Georgia to across the country. FAQs 1. What is foster adoption and how is it different from infant adoption? Foster adoption is the process of adopting a child who is already in the foster care system rather than adopting a newborn through a private agency or independent arrangement. Where infant adoption typically involves a birth mother choosing to place her child, foster adoption involves children who have already entered state care. The legal pathway runs through the foster system — prospective parents become certified foster parents first, with the goal of permanent adoption as the outcome. 2. What is the process for becoming a foster adoptive parent? The first step is foster parent certification. From there, prospective parents work within the legal and social services framework alongside caseworkers toward a permanent placement. The process is not one-size-fits-all — parents can specify criteria such as the preferred age range of the child based on their family's situation and needs. The most important disposition a prospective parent can bring to the process is a clear understanding of their role: working with the system, not around it, toward a stable and permanent outcome for the child. 3. Why do adoptive parents push back on being called heroes? Because the hero ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    35 分
  • Let Them Live: Financial Reasons Women Choose Abortion with Emily Berning
    2023/02/07

    Seventy-three percent of women who seek abortions cite financial hardship as a primary factor. If that statistic is accurate — and the research supports it — then a significant portion of abortions are not exercises of free choice but of no other perceived choice. This episode examines what it looks like to take that seriously: what Let Them Live does, how it works, and why addressing the financial roots of abortion decisions is not a concession to the pro-choice position but a more honest engagement with the problem.

    Main Points of Discussion

    (00:00) Introduction

    (01:25) About Emily Berning

    (07:07) The mission of Let Them Live: direct financial support for women in crisis pregnancies

    (09:07) The real cost of motherhood

    (11:17) Do women want to choose abortion? How financial pressure drives the decision

    (13:34) How the overturn of Roe v. Wade shifted the pro-life focus from legislation to support

    (17:15) How political incentives get in the way of actually helping women

    (20:43) The stigma of single motherhood and its role in abortion decisions

    (21:54) Why Let Them Live operates without a proselytizing mandate — and why that expands their reach

    (24:22) Why Let Them Live is something both pro-life and pro-choice advocates can support

    (26:52) How Let Them Live differs from other pro-life organizations

    (30:08) The operational model: hotline, social media outreach, and direct bill payment

    (33:33) Responding to requests for help on social media

    (34:55) Monthly financial goals and donor accountability

    (38:37) Closing remarks

    Support the Research: https://mereliberty.com/membership/

    続きを読む 一部表示
    42 分
  • Decriminalizing Sex: Where Prostitution Meets Purity Culture
    2023/01/02
    Hyperlinked show notes found at mereliberty.com/035 TIP JAR: https://donate.stripe.com/aEUdUE5YodhZgkUeUV Summary - Decriminalizing Sex: Where Prostitution Meets Purity Culture An odd twist in my research on a libertarian theory of reproductive rights (and abortion), I've had to dive into how the criminal justice system treats the crime of rape. In doing so, I've been led to what might appear to be very strange. The parallels between the culture surrounding illicit sex work and evangelical purity culture. I cannot say where any causal relations lay between the two, only that they appear to be, strikingly, correlated. And correlated in such a way that Christians in particular must pay attention and take heed. In this episode, I seek to break down the legal concerns regarding sex work and prostitution, and the connections to human trafficking. The connection to human trafficking is difficult given the prevalence and nature of trauma. I wrote a review of Dr. Gabor Mate's work on trauma in a documentary called, The Wisdom of Trauma. One aspect he addresses are the reasons why women will prostitute themselves and it seems to stem exclusively from trauma. But, when it comes to dealing with traumatized people, there is a principled disagreement about how to deal with sex workers with trauma: use the legal violence of the state to rescue women, penalize women, or only in response to violence done against them. But there might be another way to deal with trauma, trafficking, and voluntarily choosing to prostitute oneself. And that lays in education concerning sex and intimate relationships. I've found a strong correlation between the views of men and women by "Johns" and "primps" and the view of men and women in evangelical purity culture. Have evangelicals unwittingly set the stage for sex trafficking and prostitution? I think there's good reason to believe that American evangelicalism contributed to the problems some evangelicals are trying to now fix, regarding sexual violence. The popular view by Christian anti-human trafficking organizations is to embrace the Nordic model - make the men behave! Use the threat of legal violence to make bad men behave better. But does this work? I also explain why the nature of economics will not allow for legal violence to "deter" bad behavior. And why this necessitates decriminalizing sex work if we're going to improve societal and legal views concerning women and sex. DISCLAIMER: While this episode is aimed at supporting decriminalizing sex work, it is not an endorsement of sex work as morally legitimate. I hold and maintain a Christian sexual ethic (sex is designed by God only for heterosexual marriage relationships), though I believe evangelical "purity culture" is an unbiblical, anti-Christian view. Main Points of Discussion 00:00 Introduction Ep. 292: Decriminalizing Prostitution: Can Christians Support it? 01:45 Definitions: 'sex work', 'prohibition', 'prostitution', trafficking' 04:04 Why is it important to understand these distinctions 05:46 Difference between 'decriminalization' and 'legalization' 07:58 Explanation of legalization; Nevada vs Rhode Island 09:08 The feminist argument against decriminalization (Nordic model) 09:55 Clip from Julie Bindell's opening statement at the Soho Forum 13:43 "The bleakest view of masculinity" 14:50 Do we know how many sex workers are trafficking vs voluntarily participating? 16:24 Clip from "Sold in America" - a "John's" view of women in purchasing sex 17:41 Evangelical Purity Culture Detour 18:09 Does 'rape culture' exist? 19:28 Nancy Pearcy: how "nominal" evangelical men skew divorce and domestic violence data in the church 23:01 What does evangelical purity culture have to do with decriminalizing prostitution? 27:08 What the so-called "experts" told evangelical women about how to have a good Christian marriage 27:33 Quotes cited by Shelia Wray Gregorie's, The Great Sex Rescue 31:55 Ontological distinctions between men and women don't require a predator/prey relationship 33:39 Connecting the stigma of sex in purity culture to the stigma found in legal prohibition of prostitution 34:21 Legal denial of basic human rights - No Humans Involved 36:22 The unjust handling of sexual violence by our criminal justice system 40% of police officers perpetrate domestic violence in their own homes. 37:41 Are victims of rape stigmatized because of prostitution, or is prostitution stigmatized because of certain views about women, already discussed? (Connection to spiritual manipulation of religious values) 41:57 The perpetual victim status of women - propagated by feminists and patriarchalists 43:17 How do we change society to value women and children, abhor the evils done against them, and still maintain a system of justice? 43:59 Misunderstanding economic demand is resulting with failure ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分