Deciphering the Libertarian Party's Position on Abortion: Key Points Unpacked
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
The Libertarian Party removed its abortion plank in 2022, ending fifty years of failed attempts to articulate a consistent position on women's and children's rights. This episode traces that history — from the LP's first platform in 1972 through the debates that led to removal — and examines what the change does and doesn't mean. Removing the plank doesn't make the LP officially pro-life, and it doesn't abandon the party's principles on women's rights. It reflects what has always been true: libertarians are genuinely divided on abortion. The deeper question — whether abortion constitutes a rights violation under the non-aggression principle — remains unresolved, and that is the debate libertarian philosophers now have to face.
Main Points of Discussion 00:00Introduction: Is the LP pro-choice? What the platform's silence means05:30The LP's abortion plank from 1972 through 2000: a history of failed attempts06:44Division within the LP: the long-standing split on abortion08:45The case for removal: neutrality, consistency, and avoiding infighting11:02The Dallas Accord and the "big tent" argument14:30Does silence on abortion threaten the rights of women?18:43What other LP platform sections say about individual rights and government intervention20:30Core libertarian values that remain in the platform after removal23:02Why removal was a move toward consistency, not abandonment of principle23:45The unresolved philosophical task: reconciling women's and fetal rights under the NAP
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません