
DOGE Government Efficiency Agency Sparks Controversy with Radical Reforms and Potential Overreach in Biden Era
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
While proponents tout DOGE’s claims of $190 billion in savings, independent analysts and federal watchdogs warn that the actual cost of those cuts may be far higher, both financially and in terms of government capability. For instance, contracts and programs were terminated based on projected, not actual, spending, making the savings look much larger than they may be in reality. More worrying to many, DOGE’s tactics have included firing essential federal workers, freezing hiring at key agencies, and shutting down social programs and technology consulting units that keep the government’s infrastructure afloat.
DOGE’s reach hasn’t stopped at the federal level. According to ABC News, at least 26 states, mostly Republican-led, have launched their own DOGE-inspired “efficiency bureaus,” sometimes as a political statement and sometimes as a serious attempt to modernize government operations. But Steve Slivinski at the Cato Institute notes that many of these state-level initiatives are just rebranded versions of routine audits—more press op than policy revolution.
DOGE has centralized an unprecedented amount of power, often overriding long-standing checks and balances. NPR reports that at the Department of Agriculture, a single DOGE-placed engineer now has the authority to review and cancel billions in payments to farmers, a move that critics warn puts too much sensitive power in unelected hands. The Supreme Court has even exempted DOGE from public disclosure laws, shielding its activities from prying eyes.
As Musk exits the scene and Congress debates the DOGE-in-Spending Act—which could make this “temporary” squad a permanent fixture—critics and supporters agree on one point: the DOGE experiment has fundamentally altered American governance. Whether it’s a clever coin for bureaucratic reform or a dangerous token for unchecked executive power will be debated long after 2025.
Thanks for tuning in—and don’t forget to subscribe. This has been a quiet please production, for more check out quiet please dot ai.
For more http://www.quietplease.ai
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta