
DOGE Department Sparks Controversy: Elon Musk Leads Radical Federal Efficiency Overhaul Under Trump Administration
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
The so-called DOGE Test has entered the public debate as a proposed standard to measure government efficiency. A recent podcast highlighted the complexities and challenges of defining and benchmarking such a metric, inviting listeners to weigh in on whether a standardized test can genuinely capture the effectiveness of sprawling government operations or if it’s merely a clever concept[1].
DOGE claims to have saved $160 billion by rooting out waste and cutting what it describes as fraudulent spending[2]. However, the path to these savings has not been without major pitfalls. Reports surfaced of agencies mistakenly firing crucial personnel, including bird flu experts, leading to some necessary rehirings. Some federal workers complain about new bureaucratic requirements—like weekly accomplishment reports—ironically reducing productivity[2].
Public sentiment is skeptical. A recent Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll revealed that 57 percent of Americans disapprove of Musk’s management within the Trump administration, with nearly six in ten expressing concern that President Trump is shrinking the federal government’s size and role too far[2]. Critics argue that mass layoffs and the dismantling of agencies are harming small businesses and raising constitutional questions, while lawsuits and mounting opposition cast doubt on DOGE’s methods and long-term legitimacy[3].
As policymakers, experts, and the public continue to debate the merits of the DOGE Test and the broader efficiency drive, one thing is clear: government operations in Washington are being transformed, and the true costs and benefits of this unprecedented experiment are still unfolding.