エピソード

  • Ribbing Pops About Female Politicians and Voter Fraud Part Two
    2023/10/05

    EPISODE 11


    Hello and welcome to episode eleven, the final episode of season 1, of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com

    ---

    • The episode delves into the claims of voter fraud involving Dominion voting machines and clarifies they are false.
    • JG baits Pops by asking if he likes any female politicians.
    • Pops counters the implied prejudice, listing various female politicians he admires from both sides of the aisle. Some names include Nikki Haley, Margaret Thatcher, and Maxine Waters.
    • JG offers his own list of politicians he respects, like Barack Obama, RBG, and Elizabeth Warren. He mentions his general distrust of politicians.
    • Pops comments on the freedom in the U.S. to support or oppose any politician.
    • Pops questions an article's claim about a software "glitch" that supposedly switched 6,000 votes from Trump to Biden in Michigan.
    • JG confirms a glitch occurred but was isolated and not systemic. He cites multiple certifications by bipartisan boards in Michigan that confirmed the results.
    • JG offers clarifications on claims around Biden's involvement in Ukraine and Hunter Biden's board membership in Burisma. He differentiates between Biden's actions and Trump's phone call regarding Ukraine.

    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/developing-nancy-pelosis-chief-staff-chief-executive-feinsteins-husband-major-shareholder-dominion-ballot-counting-systems/

    https://www.moneycontrol.com/news/world/us-election-2020-michigan-officials-rectify-error-after-software-glitch-incorrectly-gave-6000-donald-trump-votes-to-joe-biden-6082151.html

    https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/16/politics/antrim-county-michigan-error-trump-tweets-fact-check/index.html

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/10/03/what-really-happened-when-biden-forced-out-ukraines-top-prosecutor/3785620002/

    https://www.metabunk.org/threads/who-owns-dominion-voting-systems-corp-not-avid-technologies-not-richard-blum.11445/


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Socialized Medicine, Article 1 and Voter Fraud
    2023/09/21

    EPISODE 10


    Hello and welcome to episode ten of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com

    ---



    Episode 10 - Socialized Medicine, Article 1, and Voter Fraud

    • JG introduces the topics of socialized medicine, Article 1 of the constitution, and voter fraud.
    • Pops gives a brief, opinionated take on each subject.
    • JG emphasizes the effectiveness of socialized medicine in certain contexts, using the VA as an example.
    • Pops voices concerns about government intervention in healthcare and the overall move towards socialism.
    • Pops quizzes JG about the Tenth Amendment.
    • JG admits to not knowing the answer, leading to a discussion about the state of the U.S. education system.
    • Pops laments the loss of patriotic pride and how history and civics are being taught in schools.
    • JG emphasizes the need to focus on the application of knowledge over rote memorization.
    • Pops discusses teacher accountability and questions the efficacy of current educational spending.
    • JG and Pops discuss the controversy surrounding ballots received after the election deadline.
    • Pops commends Justice Alito's decision to set aside those ballots.
    • JG and Pops also touch on the Electoral College, with JG pointing out its pros and cons, and Pops emphasizing its historical importance.
    • Jonathan teases the next episode which will delve deeper into the topic of election integrity.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXWTQobaMaQ


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fef9LU7HPiM


    https://video.foxnews.com/v/4858508550001#sp=show-clips.


    https://www.forbes.com/sites/peterubel/2018/11/21/what-socialized-medicine-would-mean-for-your-health/?sh=2945976a6e9a


    https://smartasset.com/insights/the-pros-and-cons-of-the-electoral-college


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    19 分
  • Voter Fraud, Defund Congress!
    2023/09/14

    EPISODE 9


    Hello and welcome to episode eight of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com

    ---


    Segment 1:

    • Voter Fraud Lawsuits Discussion
    • Is there credibility in the allegations?
    • Giuliani's role and reputation
    • Trump's tactics
    • Voting irregularities in Detroit and Philadelphia
    • Historical election fraud in cities like Chicago and Philadelphia
    • Pops' concerns about a potential Biden and Harris administration

    Segment 2:

    • Validity and Scope of Voter Fraud
    • Comparing Florida 2000 situation to current multi-state allegations
    • The mechanics and potential pitfalls of mail-in voting
    • Data from The Washington Post, Brennan Center at NYU School of Law, and The Heritage Foundation
    • The issue of public trust in the electoral process
    • Suspicious activities and behavior patterns in voting centers
    • Impartiality of officials in the electoral process

    Segment 3:

    • The Role and Longevity of Politicians
    • The distinction between presidential power and congressional tenure
    • Pops' perspective on the importance of Congress over the presidency

    Segment 4:

    • Bumper Stickers and Political Views
    • Pops' potential new bumper stickers about Congress and Cops
    • JG's ideas on a universal slogan about money and corruption


    https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Briefing_Memo_Debunking_Voter_Fraud_Myth.pdf


    https://www.heritage.org/voterfraud




    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • Evidence that Trump is a scoundrel and Biden's Tax Plan
    2023/08/24

    EPISODE 8


    Hello and welcome to episode eight of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com


    • Topics covered include:New documents on Trump.
    • Biden’s tax plan.
    • Direction of the American educational system.
    • Balancing military spending with education funding.
    • The possibility of America leaning too far into socialism.

    Documentary Recommendations by JG for Pops:

    • "The Swamp" (HBO) - Focuses on Republican Congressman Matt Gaetz's attempt to change lobbying culture in Washington.
    • "Dirty Money Episode 6" (Netflix) - Highlights Trump’s financial dealings.
    • "Trump: An American Dream" (Netflix) - Documents Trump's rise and relationships, including ties with Deutsche Bank.

    Pops' Response:

    • Skepticism about the accuracy of documentaries on Netflix due to political connections.
    • Affirms he'll watch the documentaries out of respect for JG's request.

    Pops' Political Stance:

    • Values Trump's policies over personality, including:
    • Personal liberty.
    • Lower taxes.
    • Strong defense.
    • America-first attitude.
    • Concerned about increasing taxes under Biden's plan.
    • Values the intentions behind policies, highlighting Biden’s shifts on certain issues.
    • Emphasizes the importance of keeping taxes low to encourage private philanthropy.

    JG’s Views:

    • Acknowledges Biden's change in views.
    • Criticizes Trump's handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and downplaying its severity.
    • Feels negatively affected by Trump’s presidency, but appreciates the economic benefits.
    • Advocates for reallocating military funds to healthcare and education.

    Education Discussion:

    • Pops:Believes the U.S. educational system is already heavily funded without effective results.
    • Criticizes the influence of political correctness in schools.
    • Emphasizes the need for a neutral educational atmosphere that fosters independent thought.
    • JG:Believes the U.S. has a duty to represent its diverse history and cultures in education.
    • Highlights the Stonewall riots as a significant historical event.
    • Advocates for letting younger generations decide the direction of their education.

    The discussion between JG and Pops is a reflection of the differing views across generations, touching upon politics, education, and societal values.


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    17 分
  • Replacement Electors, Radiolab and Pops' true feelings about Nancy Pelosi
    2023/08/17

    Hello and welcome to episode seven of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com



    https://www.vox.com/2020/9/28/21459803/trump-taxes-nyt-foreign-business-national-security


    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/10/a-long-list-of-shady-financial-mysteries-trump-still-refuses-to-explain/


    https://radiolab.org/podcast/what-if


    https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/list/?speaker=joe-biden


    • Introduction:This is episode 7 of their podcast.
    • Jonathan Grossman is the host and Michael Grossman, an AI-generated version of his voice, is the co-host.
    • Discussion Topics:Trump’s foreign business entanglements, referenced by a Vox article.
    • Potential corruption of Biden and Harris, referenced by a Mother Jones article.
    • Philosophical discussion about accepting the corruption of a chosen candidate vs. opposing candidates.
    • A Radiolab episode regarding the Transition Integrity Project in June 2020 which played out scenarios if Trump denied the 2020 election results.
    • Mention of Trump’s lawyer, Kenneth Chesebro, and the memo outlining the replacement elector strategy.
    • Radiolab being a gold standard for podcasts.
    • Contentious Points:Michael thinks Jonathan keeps focusing on Trump's corruption.
    • Jonathan believes Michael's support for Trump makes him overlook potential issues with him.
    • Both agree that politicians are inherently corrupt to some extent, but have different thresholds of acceptance.
    • The subjectivity and potential bias of mainstream media sources are debated, including sources like Mother Jones and Snopes.
    • Jonathan wants Michael to see beyond the allegations and judge candidates on policy.
    • A truce is proposed: Jonathan won't call Trump a crook if Michael refrains from vilifying Pelosi.
    • Radiolab Podcast Discussion:The potential election outcomes and complications, especially concerning the electoral college, are highlighted.
    • The potential breakdown of discipline in the military ranks is discussed in relation to a constitutional crisis.
    • Conclusion:Both express the need for addressing the gaps in the electoral college system.
    • Michael teases Jonathan about Pelosi's integrity.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • Constitution, Fitness For Office and Abortion
    2023/08/10

    Hello and welcome to episode six of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com


    • The podcast conversation began with discussing two styles of constitutional interpretations: Originalism and Textualism. Originalism refers to interpreting the Constitution based on the meaning the words carried at the time of writing, while Textualism considers what a reasonable person would understand the text of a law to mean.
    • There was some light-hearted banter about their personal preferences and differences in music tastes.
    • The discussion shifted to the fitness of Trump or Biden/Harris for office, with the latter being considered unfit by Pops.
    • The topic of abortion was brought up, but not as a pro-life vs pro-choice debate, as both participants agreed on being pro-choice. The conversation centered around whether Planned Parenthood had been illegally selling aborted fetuses.
    • Kamala Harris' actions as AG, specifically regarding the Planned Parenthood controversy, were questioned, as Pops believed that she may have abused her power to quell any outcry of wrongdoing by a whistleblower.
    • There was a detailed exchange on how to interpret the constitution in the modern context, comparing it to evaluating current music by the standards of the 1950s.
    • Pops argued that the stance on the interpretation of the constitution often flips depending on the preferred position on an issue. He illustrated this with the example of the debate on gun control.
    • The topic of politicians benefiting from their positions was discussed. Pops contended that Biden's dealings were questionable, mentioning his involvement with Ukraine, China, and Iran.
    • Pops criticized Kamala Harris for her alleged abuse of power and corruption, indicating his belief that she is unfit for office.
    • The host refuted some of Pops' points, noting that multiple state investigations found no evidence of Planned Parenthood unlawfully selling fetal tissue. He also stated that Kamala Harris had already left her AG position before charges were brought against Daleiden, the man behind the accusations.
    • Pops expressed his skepticism towards Snopes as a reliable source, citing perceived bias in their reporting. He stressed the importance of using primary sources as much as possible.



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • Has America Gone Mad?
    2023/08/03

    Hello and welcome to episode five of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    We never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com


    • The show discusses the feelings of confusion and disbelief experienced by many right-wing Americans, as articulated in a letter by conservative radio talk show host Joyce Kaufman.
    • The letter expresses the feeling of living in a topsy-turvy world where right is perceived as wrong and vice versa, comparing it to the Twilight Zone or "the upside down."
    • The host, JG, and his co-host, Pops, engage in a back-and-forth dialogue, breaking down and reacting to each point made in the letter.
    • JG surprises himself by agreeing with some of the right-wing perspectives, leading Pops to suggest that JG might be more of a libertarian than a liberal.
    • They discuss multiple societal issues including LGBTQ+ rights, abortion, immigration, racism, justice system, and social historical accountability, providing both conservative and liberal perspectives.
    • The discourse also touches upon irony and paradoxes in American politics, such as the tension between free speech and political correctness, prioritization of different issues by different groups, and the contradiction between what the government says versus what it does.
    • Pops and JG agree that while they have differing viewpoints on many issues, the root of the problem lies in the loss of trust and respect for differing opinions and the need for more nuance in society.
    • The dialogue illustrates that despite the ideological divide, there is room for understanding, acknowledging, and even agreeing with points from the 'other side'.
    • They emphasize the importance of open-mindedness, respectful discourse, and the need to prioritize issues based on personal experiences and societal impact.
    • The conversation concludes with Pops praising JG's articulation of the points and the mutual understanding that the country's current state reflects a loss of trust in public discourse and the need for more tolerance and understanding.




    https://sicem365.com/forums/7/topics/74233


    https://youtu.be/FWOWXHGAgeA


    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    21 分
  • Do the politicians truly take a stand against extremist and radical groups?
    2023/07/27

    Hello and welcome to episode four of Conversations with my Conservative Dead Father. This podcast comes from direct transcriptions of the email exchanges my father and I had the year before he died. My father was a smart educated guy who happened to also be a conservative. As you might guess, I’m a liberal. These discussions create a forum I know he would proud to be a part of - even if there’s a dangling participle in that sentence. Sorry Pops!


    My father and I never tried to convince each other. Our objective was to learn and listen. It was a great gift to be able to hear the other side from someone who I very much respected, even if I totally disagreed with the conclusions.


    So let’s get started.

    ----

    https://theconversation.com/fact-check-us-is-there-an-antifa-threat-in-the-united-states-as-donald-trump-claims-150555


    https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/6/8/21277320/antifa-anti-fascist-explained


    https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/516911-fbi-director-wray-calls-antifa-a-real-thing/


    https://issuesinsights.com/2020/08/06/no-doubts-now-that-the-democrats-are-part-of-the-riot-problem/


    For more information about me:


    mail@nightshiftaudio.com

    www.NightShiftAudio.com



    • The podcast discusses the role of extremists on both the left and right, specifically Antifa and White Supremacist groups, in current politics.
    • The hosts examine the validity of the claim made in an editorial that Democrats are part of the riot problem due to their silence on Antifa, using the Latin phrase "Qui tacet consentire videtur" which translates to "he who remains silent appears to consent".
    • They also explore the presence and threat of Antifa, with one of the hosts mentioning statements from Democrat Jerry Nadler who initially claimed Antifa was “imaginary” and later described its role in the Portland riots as a “myth”.
    • The podcast refers to multiple sources to discuss Antifa's involvement in violence and rioting. Reports from Vox and FBI Director Christopher Wray confirm that Antifa does exist and has been involved in some violent incidents. However, they emphasize that it is a movement, not an organization, and its threat is considerably less than that posed by White Supremacists.
    • The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is cited as stating that the white-supremacist movement is the “most persistent and lethal threat in the homeland”. In contrast, the Antifa movement, due to its lack of structure or centralized hierarchy, does not pose a similar threat to American democracy or the U.S.
    • The podcast hosts concur that any form of violence, regardless of who perpetrates it, is unacceptable and needs to be addressed. They critique politicians who deny or downplay these violent acts, especially those related to Antifa.
    • The podcast also addresses the political ramifications of the 2020 presidential elections, discussing potential scenarios if Donald Trump wins or if Joe Biden wins and becomes unable to perform his duties.
    • The conversation ends on a lighter note with the hosts attempting to correctly pronounce the name of Kamala Harris.
    • They provide links to articles from The Conversation, Vox, and The Hill, for further reading on the topics discussed.

    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.



    This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit familyvoicesai.substack.com
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分