Controversial U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon Shakes Up Higher Ed, Redefines Federal Role

カートのアイテムが多すぎます

ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。

カートに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。

しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。

ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました

ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました

Controversial U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon Shakes Up Higher Ed, Redefines Federal Role

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

このコンテンツについて

Secretary of Education Linda McMahon has quickly become a central figure in national debates over the direction of American education, making a series of high-profile decisions and statements that have garnered widespread attention in recent days. Her most recent and controversial move was to notify Harvard University that it will no longer be eligible for federal grants, citing the university’s handling of campus antisemitism and alleged violations of federal law. In her strongly worded letter to Harvard’s president, McMahon criticized the university’s management and referenced its massive tax-free endowment, questioning whether taxpayer funds should continue supporting an institution she argued had shown disregard for both legal and academic standards. She also targeted Harvard’s decision to offer remedial math courses and to drop standardized testing, challenging the university’s admissions and academic rigor.

This action follows a larger push from McMahon to overhaul the federal role in education. In response to President Trump’s proposed Fiscal Year 2026 budget, McMahon emphasized a shift away from federal bureaucracy, advocating for the expansion of school choice and the simplification of funding streams for low-income and special needs students. The proposed budget consolidates numerous grant programs into two simplified streams, aimed at reducing administrative overhead while maintaining support for vulnerable populations. According to McMahon, these reforms intend to redirect funds from ineffective or duplicative programs toward initiatives that yield measurable results for students and families.

McMahon has also taken decisive action regarding COVID relief funds. In a sudden announcement, she informed state education officials that previously granted extensions for spending pandemic relief money had been rescinded. States and districts were given a same-day deadline to liquidate all remaining funds, with McMahon arguing that the additional time was not justified and that the post-pandemic use of such funds no longer aligned with the department’s priorities.

Her approach is shaped by a broader mandate to oversee what she and the president have characterized as the “final mission” of the U.S. Department of Education. McMahon, confirmed by the Senate as the 13th and potentially last Secretary of Education, has pledged to prepare the agency for closure while ensuring a transition of educational oversight to states. She has repeatedly stated her commitment to reducing federal intervention, eliminating bureaucratic barriers, and empowering parents, teachers, and local communities.

Throughout her tenure, McMahon has also made it clear that she intends to protect essential funding streams for schools even as she works to eliminate what she views as unnecessary federal oversight and inefficiency. These dramatic changes are part of a historic effort to redefine the federal government’s role in education, and McMahon’s assertive actions and rhetoric suggest she will continue making bold, high-impact decisions as this “final mission” unfolds.