Commission Reflections: Limits and Commitments
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
After hearing testimony from Dr. Matsuo and other panelists, members of the Commission offered reflections on the process and their role. Their comments balanced empathy with reminders of the Commission’s limits.
Judge Marutani: Thanked panelists, admitted he could not disagree with their goals, but reminded them the Commission must deliver its final report by July of next year. Warned that “he who chases two rabbits catches neither” — urging focus on what can be achieved.
Dr. Flemming: Emphasized the importance of both individual and organizational testimony, noting that each story is unique and invaluable. Called incarceration a “flagrant violation of civil rights” and reassured witnesses that even seemingly repetitive testimony adds depth to the record. Urged people not to read too much into commissioners’ questions, which are sometimes meant to surface helpful evidence rather than signal conclusions.
Mr. Mitchell: Clarified that Justice Goldberg’s earlier remarks should not be misinterpreted as official positions. Stressed that commissioners share many of the community’s goals but must work within time and scope.
Chairman Lungren: Thanked the panel, noted Congresswoman Bobbi Fiedler’s written support for the Commission’s work, and announced a short recess before Judge Marutani would resume as chair.
Together, these remarks underscored both the constraints and the commitment of the Commission — balancing the urgency of testimony with the practicalities of producing findings and recommendations.