Can a Heavy Drinker Ever Drink Again?
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
In this episode — Dr. Andrew Tatarsky, developer of Integrative Harm Reduction Psychotherapy, returns for a second conversation. They take up the question that divides the field, whether a person who once drank a fifth a day can ever have a drink on a Saturday night. Andrew: some can, some can’t, we don’t yet have the science to tell which, and the therapist’s job is to help each person answer it for themselves. Also: the “submit–rebel bind” abstinence-first treatment sets up, an 89-year-old client who cut her drinking in three sessions, addiction as a continuum that includes junk food and the phone in your hand, and harm reduction as the container for psychedelic-assisted therapy.
Guest: Dr. Andrew Tatarsky — clinical psychologist and psychoanalyst, New York; PhD in Clinical Psychology; postdoctoral certificate in psychotherapy and psychoanalysis (NYU); developer of Integrative Harm Reduction Psychotherapy (IHRP); more than 40 years in practice; author of Harm Reduction Psychotherapy: A New Treatment for Drug and Alcohol Problems. andrewtatarsky.com · About · Training · Book
Nothing in this conversation is medical advice.
Chapters
00:00 — Cold open: addiction as a universal human response to suffering
00:54 — Welcome: the case for community
02:20 — Two harm reduction stories: a call from the White House, and a two-page letter at NPR
05:41 — The acting drug czar who changed his mind
08:31 — What harm reduction is: the disease model, the drug war, and the AIDS crisis
11:15 — From public health to psychotherapy: compassionate pragmatism, start where people are
14:29 — Religion and the law: clean or using, no gray
16:27 — Can a person who drank a fifth a day ever have a drink on a Saturday night?
17:25 — Taught the disease model in the eighties, and in the sixties: Jellinek’s chart
19:09 — An alternative paradigm: addiction as a response to suffering
20:36 — Who can moderate and who can’t: we don’t have the science
22:46 — Why this is a courageous position: impulse control disorders
25:18 — Drinking, driving, skiing: the bad-driver analogy
27:13 — The submit–rebel bind
29:16 — An 89-year-old who wanted to cut back her drinking
31:43 — Alcohol at 87: the finest fuel
33:09 — Addiction on a continuum: junk food, phones, relational meaning
36:25 — Gambling, eating, shopping, sex
38:04 — Psychedelics and harm reduction: ketamine, ibogaine, a New York training
41:06 — Close
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.mindbodyhealthpolitics.org/subscribe