エピソード

  • 730 AD – John Defends Icons -Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today

    730 AD – John Defends Icons -Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today
    2025/09/10
    730 AD – John Defends Icons: Faithful Art Reflects Jesus’ Incarnation Today Published 9/10/2025 Cold Hook 1:21 Show Intro 1:17 Narrative Foundation 1:50 Narrative Development 1:52 Climax & Impact 1:53 Legacy & Relevance 1:23 Reflection & Call 1:22 Outro 1:08 Metadata In 730 AD, John of Damascus, a monk near Jerusalem, defied Emperor Leo III’s ban on icons. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images argued that depicting Jesus affirmed His incarnation—God made visible. Icons weren’t idols but windows to Christ, like how family photos remind us of loved ones. His writings gave believers language to resist icon smashing, assuring them they were not betraying God but honoring the Word made flesh. John also composed hymns still sung today, weaving theology into worship. Though the emperor tried to silence him, John’s words endured, shaping the Second Council of Nicaea (787), which upheld veneration of icons. His legacy reminds us that worship is never about style—chant, hymn, or guitar—but about Jesus Himself. This episode challenges us to honor Christ in every form of devotion, seeing beauty not as an idol but as a testimony to the God who became flesh. Keywords (≤500 characters) John of Damascus, iconoclasm, defense of icons, Three Treatises on the Divine Images, Leo III, Byzantine icon ban, Second Council of Nicaea, Christian art, incarnation, Eastern Orthodox tradition, veneration vs worship, visual theology, Byzantine history, 8th century Christianity, hymn writer, Jerusalem monastery, icons, Christian worship, council of Nicaea II Hashtags #ChurchHistory #JohnofDamascus #Icons #Byzantine #OrthodoxFaith Script Chunks Cold Hook The decree came like a hammer from Constantinople [kon-stan-TEE-noh-pul]. Emperor Leo III had spoken: the holy images that filled churches—the icons of Christ, the saints, scenes from scripture—they were to be destroyed. For generations, believers had prayed before them, not as idols, but as reminders of the God who became visible in Jesus. Now soldiers tore them from walls, smashed them in the streets, and mocked those who wept. In one village, worshipers walked into church to find blank walls where saints once looked back at them. For the first time, children saw plaster instead of the story. Most stayed silent, afraid of imperial power. But in a monastery near Jerusalem [jer-uh-SAH-lum], one voice refused to be silenced. John of Damascus [duh-MAS-kus], a scholar and hymn writer, took up his pen. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images defended what emperors sought to erase. He argued that to honor Christ’s image was to honor His incarnation—that God took on flesh, and therefore could be pictured. This was no academic debate. It was faith under siege, fought not with swords, but with ink and conviction. Show Intro From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Wednesdays, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD. Today we turn to the year 730, when an emperor tried to erase the images of Jesus from the life of the church—and one man dared to answer. John of Damascus, writing from his monastery near Jerusalem, defended the use of icons at a time when Emperor Leo III had banned them. To Leo, images were dangerous, too close to idolatry. But to John, they were reminders of the Word made flesh—that the invisible God had become visible in Jesus. His Three Treatises on the Divine Images spread quickly, strengthening resistance to icon smashing and shaping worship for centuries to come. This was more than art. It was about how believers remembered Jesus and confessed His presence in their midst. Narrative Foundation By the early eighth century, tension in the Byzantine Empire was rising. Emperor Leo III had issued an edict: icons—the painted images of Jesus, Mary, and the saints—were to be banned. He believed such images broke the commandment against idolatry. Soldiers obeyed by tearing icons from churches and burning them in public squares. But for many Christians, icons weren’t idols. They were windows into the story of salvation. An image of Jesus at His baptism reminded them that God had entered human history. A painting of Mary holding her child spoke of the mystery of the incarnation. To pray in front of these images was not to worship wood and paint but to remember the Savior who had come in flesh. It’s like deleting every photo of your family from your phone. You don’t worship those pixels—but without them, something important is missing. Into this storm stepped John of Damascus. Living under Muslim rule near Jerusalem, he was out of reach of the emperor’s direct power. That gave him freedom to speak when others were silenced. John was already respected as a theologian and hymn writer. His words carried weight. QUOTE: “I do not worship matter, but the Creator of matter, who became matter for my sake.” In 730, he wrote his Three Treatises, arguing that if Jesus truly ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • 225 AD – Hippolytus’ Apostolic Tradition Shapes Early Liturgy: Order Anchors Worship in Christ

    225 AD – Hippolytus’ Apostolic Tradition Shapes Early Liturgy: Order Anchors Worship in Christ
    2025/09/08
    225 AD – Hippolytus’ Apostolic Tradition Shapes Early Liturgy: Order Anchors Worship in Christ TIMESTAMPS (calculated at 127.5 WPM, rounded) Cold Hook: 00:00Intro: 01:21Foundation: 02:39Development: 04:08Climax/Impact: 06:09Legacy & Modern Relevance: 08:19Reflection & Call: 09:53Outro: 11:30 Metadata Oil lamps flicker in a Roman house as believers prepare for baptism. Every word matters. In 225 AD, Hippolytus of Rome preserved the Apostolic Tradition, recording baptism, communion, ordination, and daily prayer. His guide anchored worship with clarity when persecution threatened chaos. It shaped liturgies East and West, showing that structure can protect devotion instead of stifling it. Hippolytus feared sloppy worship could harm the church’s witness. By gathering apostolic practices into a manual, he safeguarded baptismal preparation, communion prayers, ordination rites, and daily devotion. Eusebius later noted his influence. His framework echoed in Eastern Orthodox and Western Catholic liturgies for centuries. This episode highlights how order and rhythm served persecuted Christians, and asks modern believers whether our worship rhythms root us in Christ or drift into routine. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. Keywords: Hippolytus, Apostolic Tradition, early liturgy, baptism, communion, ordination, early church worship, Rome, 225 AD, Eucharist, church order, persecution, structure, daily prayer Hashtags: #ChurchHistory #EarlyChurch #Hippolytus #Liturgy Description In 225 AD, Hippolytus of Rome wrote the Apostolic Tradition, one of the earliest guides to Christian worship. It detailed baptism, communion, ordination, and daily prayer. In a time of persecution, his work gave the church clarity, discipline, and reverence. This episode explores how Hippolytus’ instructions shaped both Eastern and Western liturgies, ensuring that Christian worship remained steady even under threat. His concern was not ritual for ritual’s sake but devotion anchored in Christ. Today’s believers can learn from his conviction that order and rhythm protect worship from drifting into chaos or routine. Join us as we step inside the house churches of Rome, watch new believers enter the waters of baptism, and discover how Hippolytus’ legacy still speaks to the church today. Script Cold Hook The lamps flickered against the walls of a Roman house. The room was crowded, hushed, waiting. A group of new believers stood in line, ready to step into baptism’s waters. For weeks they had prepared — fasting, praying, learning to leave behind their old lives. This was not casual. Every word was chosen with care. Bread and wine waited on the table. Leaders prepared to lay hands in prayer. The whole gathering leaned forward, expectant. In the year 225, a leader named Hippolytus [hi-PAH-li-tus] wrote down how moments like this should unfold. Baptism, communion, prayer, ordination — all ordered with reverence. He called it the Apostolic Tradition. Why? Because even when Christians faced suspicion and danger, worship needed clarity, not chaos. His record became one of the earliest guides to Christian liturgy — shaping the rhythm of worship for centuries to come. [AD BREAK] Intro From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH — Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Mondays, we stay between 0 and 500 AD. Today we turn to the year 225. A Roman leader named Hippolytus [hi-PAH-li-tus] recorded how Christians baptized new believers, shared communion, and ordained ministers. He called it the Apostolic Tradition. These weren’t empty directions. They were survival tools. In a time when persecution pressed hard and gatherings were fragile, his work gave believers order and unity. What he wrote would echo in worship practices for centuries — East and West alike. But was it just ritual? Or did structure actually help keep devotion alive? Foundation By the early third century, the Christian movement in Rome had grown enough to be noticed — and questioned. Believers met in houses, sometimes in secret, but their gatherings varied. Some were marked by deep reverence. Others, according to critics, fell into disorder. Hippolytus, a presbyter — an elder who taught and led — worried that sloppy worship could harm the church’s witness. He feared confusion inside would weaken believers already pressured from outside. So he began writing down what he believed matched the practices handed down from the apostles. Baptism, communion, ordination, daily prayer — all with clear steps. In his Apostolic Tradition, he insisted that worship should follow order: QUOTE “Everything should be done in a fitting and orderly way.” end quote. That phrase, from the Bible, showed the heart of his concern. Order was not about control. It was about keeping worship Christ-centered and unshaken when trials came. Development Hippolytus didn’t just list rules ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    10 分
  • 1619 AD – Dort’s Clash Over Salvation: God’s Grace Makes Room Calvinism and Arminianism Today

    1619 AD – Dort’s Clash Over Salvation: God’s Grace Makes Room Calvinism and Arminianism Today
    2025/09/06
    1619 AD – Dort’s Clash Over Salvation: God’s Grace Makes Room Calvinism and Arminianism Today Published 9/12/2025 TIMESTAMPS [Cold Hook] 00:00 [Intro] 01:20 [Foundation] 02:46 [Development] 05:47 [Climax/Impact] 08:56 [Legacy & Modern Relevance] 12:16 [Reflection & Call] 14:50 [Outro] 17:29 📦 Metadata (One Paragraph) They thought the Bible was clear. But when believers gathered in 1619 to settle how salvation works—they found tension, not easy answers. In 1619, pastors and church leaders from across Europe met to settle a growing debate: how does salvation work? Some believed God decides everything. Others said we have a role in responding. Both sides quoted the Bible. Both believed they were right. But beneath it all was a deeper issue: Can we defend grace without losing it? The Synod of 1619 wasn’t just about theology—it was about how Christians handle disagreement. Some said God chooses who gets saved. Others said we have to respond. Both sides used Scripture, logic, and strong conviction. But maybe that’s the point. Maybe grace means we don’t have to get it all right to be saved. We don’t have to pick a side to trust Jesus. This episode tells the story of a church trying to figure out grace—and reminds us that humility, not certainty, may be the greater mark of faith. Because the deeper we go in God’s Word, the more we realize we don’t know everything—and that’s okay. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. Keywords Synod, 1619, salvation, grace, church history, church councils, free will, election, theology, Christian doctrine, church disagreement, Netherlands, Bible interpretation, what is grace, how are we saved Hashtags #ChurchHistory, #GraceAndTruth, #FaithNotFormula, #COACHPodcast, #SalvationDebates Description In 1619, church leaders gathered in the Dutch city of Dordrecht—better known as Dort—to resolve a growing dispute about salvation. The Synod of Dort became one of the most defining councils in Protestant history. On one side were the Remonstrants, followers of Jacobus Arminius, who emphasized conditional election and the possibility of falling away. On the other side stood defenders of Reformed teaching, affirming God’s sovereign initiative and effectual grace. Both sides appealed to Scripture, both claimed the gospel, and both spoke with conviction. The result was the Canons of Dort, a detailed rebuttal of the Remonstrant position and the origin of the theological framework later remembered as TULIP. But the debate didn’t end in 1619. Today, Christians still wrestle with the same questions: Is salvation purely God’s choice, or must we respond? This episode traces the council’s drama, its impact, and what it means for believers who find themselves caught between certainty and humility. Grace, after all, may be bigger than our systems. 🎙 Script CHUNK 1 – COLD HOOK They had gathered from across the continent—pastors, professors, church leaders. Some came reluctantly. Some came burning with conviction. All came to settle one of the most pressing and personal questions in the Christian faith: How are we saved? It was 1619. The Netherlands had invited leaders from the Protestant world to resolve a growing tension. Two groups, both claiming to follow Scripture, both devoted to Christ, had arrived at completely different answers. One group believed God chose individuals to be saved, before they were even born. The other insisted salvation was offered to all, and that people could choose to reject it. Each side brought verses, arguments, and years of church tradition. But beneath the theology was something deeper—something unspoken. What if you’re wrong? What if the other side is right? And what if the real danger isn’t losing the debate—but missing the heart of grace itself? CHUNK 2 – INTRO From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH — Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Fridays, we stay between 1500 and 2000 AD. Today we’re in 1619, in the Dutch city of Dordrecht—known to most as “Dort.” For years, churches had been divided over how salvation works. Some believed God chooses certain people to be saved. Others believed every person can respond freely. It wasn’t just a disagreement. It was threatening to fracture Protestant unity altogether. To resolve the debate, a synod—a formal church council—was called. But this wasn’t a quiet Bible study. It was a high-stakes gathering with political backing, national tension, and theological heat. And the question was anything but theoretical: Is salvation all up to God—or do we have a say in it? CHUNK 3 – NARRATIVE FOUNDATION The debate didn’t start in 1619. Years earlier, a Dutch pastor named Jacobus Arminius [ar-MIN-ee-us] had begun to question certain teachings common in the Reformed churches of his day. He didn’t deny God’s sovereignty. He didn’t claim people could...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    15 分
  • 1525 AD – Drowned for Belief in Baptism - Women Sing While Going to the River

    1525 AD – Drowned for Belief in Baptism - Women Sing While Going to the River
    2025/09/05
    1525 AD – Drowned for Belief in Baptism - Women Sing While Going to the River Published 9/5/2025 TIMESTAMPS Cold Hook: 00:00Intro: 02:02Foundation: 03:56Development: 06:28Climax/Impact: 09:00Legacy & Modern Relevance: 11:20Reflection & Call: 14:08Outro: 17:36 Metadata Package Anabaptist women chose faith over life, facing drowning for baptism convictions. In 1525, Anabaptist women faced execution for refusing infant baptism and clinging to believer’s baptism. Their deaths, often by drowning as “counter-baptism,” shook both Catholic and Protestant authorities. This story illustrates the courage that shaped later faith and inspired religious liberty. This episode explores the harrowing story of Anabaptist women martyred in the 1520s–1530s. Executed by drowning for rejecting infant baptism, these women stood firm, singing and praying as they died. Their testimonies, preserved in Martyrs Mirror and hymns like the Ausbund, reveal the tension between conscience and coercion in early Reformation Europe. We trace how these stories became central to Anabaptist identity and how their legacy speaks to today’s debates about conscience, courage, and freedom of faith. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. Keywords (≤200 chars) Anabaptist martyrs, Maria of Monjou, Martyrs Mirror, believer’s baptism, 1525 Reformation, women of faith, drowning executions, religious liberty, conscience, hymns Hashtags (≤100 chars) #ChurchHistory #Anabaptist #Martyrs #FaithAndConscience #COACH Description In 1525, the Reformation took a radical turn that both Catholics and Protestants found intolerable. Men and women known as Anabaptists rejected infant baptism and insisted that baptism belonged only to those who could confess faith for themselves. What seemed like a small theological dispute quickly became a matter of life and death. To refuse infant baptism was not simply to reject a church ritual; it was to break from the entire social and political fabric of Europe, where church and state were bound together. The cost was highest for those who embraced this conviction openly. Anabaptist women, often young wives and mothers, stood at the center of this controversy. For them, baptism was no longer something done to them as infants but something they chose in obedience to Christ. That choice was seen as treason against both civil authority and spiritual tradition. Drowning became a preferred method of execution for women—a grim “counter-baptism” that mocked their confession. Yet the testimonies that survive do not describe terror or despair. They describe songs. They describe prayers. They describe women who went to the riverbanks and scaffolds singing hymns that still echo today. Maria of Monjou, executed in 1552 after years of imprisonment, became one of the most remembered of these martyrs. Her hymn, preserved in the Ausbund hymnal, declared: “Oh, joyfully I will sing, and give thanks to my Lord; He has redeemed me from death, and freed me from great distress.” Their courage did not end with their deaths. The Martyrs Mirror gathered their stories, placing them alongside those of early Christians who faced lions and flames. Their hymns were preserved and sung for generations, long after their voices were silenced. These records remind us that genuine faith is not inherited by tradition or compelled by law. It must be confessed freely, lived boldly, and, if necessary, suffered for. This episode of COACH tells their story—not as distant history, but as a living challenge. What does it mean to stand by faith when everything is against you? What does it mean to confess Christ when silence would be easier? The courage of these women is not simply to be admired—it is to be considered. Their witness asks us whether our own faith is convenience or conviction, custom or confession. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. Script Cold Hook The water was calm that morning, but the town square was not. Crowds pressed forward to see the condemned. Soldiers tied a woman’s hands, yet her lips moved in prayer. To some, she was a criminal; to others, a saint. Her defiance was not in violence or rebellion, but in her refusal to let anyone else decide when she would be baptized. The authorities thought drowning a fitting punishment—a bitter parody of her choice to enter the water by faith. They called it a “second baptism.” She called it obedience to Christ. And as the ropes tightened, her voice rose. She sang a hymn, turning her final breath into witness. No one expected women to defy both Catholic and Protestant rulers. No one expected them to preach with their deaths. Yet in the early years of the Reformation, beginning in 1525, Anabaptist women walked into rivers and flames with a courage that startled executioners and shook the conscience of onlookers. Their story is not ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    14 分
  • 540 AD – Milan Destroyed: Worship Endures Beyond Fire and Betrayal

    540 AD – Milan Destroyed: Worship Endures Beyond Fire and Betrayal
    2025/09/03
    540 AD – Milan Destroyed: Worship Endures Beyond Fire and Betrayal Published 9-3-2025 TIMESTAMPS - Cold Hook: 00:00 - Intro: 01:29 - Foundation: 02:25 - Development: 04:53 - Climax/Impact: 06:47 - Legacy & Modern Relevance: 08:35 - Reflection & Call: 11:45 - Outro: 11:45 Metadata A Christian city burned. Faith survived. In 540 AD, Milan—once shaped by Ambrose and alive with worship—was besieged by Ostrogoths and abandoned by Byzantine allies. Procopius records its slaughter, Gregory of Tours echoes its silence. Yet the Ambrosian rite endured, reminding us that worship outlives buildings. This episode explores the fall of Milan during the Gothic War, when Byzantine generals Belisarius and Narses quarreled instead of defending the city. Procopius tells how men were killed, women enslaved, and churches burned. Gregory of Tours later confirmed the devastation. Yet survivors carried the Ambrosian rite beyond the ruins, proving that worship can endure even after cities fall. Modern parallels abound: as many as 15,000 churches are projected to close in 2025, and 40 million Americans have drifted from worship in the last 25 years. Milan’s silence still asks us: will we worship Jesus when earthly supports collapse? Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. ## Keywords Milan 540 AD, Ambrose, Gothic War, Procopius, Gregory of Tours, Justinian, Belisarius, Narses, Ostrogoths, Ambrosian rite, church history, church closures, worship, Christian persecution, early Christianity, medieval church ## Hashtags #ChurchHistory #Milan #COACHpodcast #FaithEndures ## Description In 540 AD, the Christian city of Milan was besieged and destroyed. Once the second largest city in Italy and home to the legacy of Ambrose, Milan was famous for its worship and influence. But during the Gothic War, Byzantine generals quarreled instead of defending it. The Ostrogoths surrounded the city, cut off food, and waited until hunger forced surrender. Procopius records the slaughter: men were killed, women enslaved, churches left silent. Gregory of Tours later confirmed the devastation. Yet the story did not end in ashes. Survivors carried the Ambrosian rite—the hymns and prayers rooted in Ambrose’s leadership—beyond Milan’s ruins. Worship endured, even when the city did not. Today, churches still face decline. Up to 15,000 U.S. churches are expected to close in 2025 alone, and nearly 40 million Americans have left worship in the last 25 years. Milan’s story asks us a personal question: if our churches close, will our worship continue? Transcript Cold Hook Imagine standing inside a great Christian city—its churches alive with song, its markets busy with trade, its people confident that God and their allies will protect them. Now imagine all of that reduced to silence. In the year 540, that’s what happened to Milan in northern Italy. Once the second largest city in the region, once famous for its worship and leadership, Milan suddenly found itself trapped. The Ostrogoth army encircled the city, determined to crush it. Inside the walls, men and women prayed for relief, convinced that the Byzantine Empire—powerful allies to the east—would send help. But no help came. When the walls finally fell, the city’s faith didn’t stop the fire. The men were slaughtered, the women enslaved, the churches stripped and burned. Milan was left silent. So here’s the unsettling question: what happens when faith outlasts buildings, but the city itself does not? Intro From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH — Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Wednesdays, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD. Today we look at Milan, a city most people know today as Italian fashion central—but in the early church, it was far more than that. It was a place of worship, learning, and influence. And yet in 540 AD, Milan’s walls crumbled, its allies failed, and its churches went silent. What happened when one of Christianity’s brightest cities was erased—and what can that story teach us now? Foundation To understand why Milan’s fall mattered, we need to know what kind of city it was. In the sixth century, Milan was the second largest city in Italy, with tens of thousands of residents. Its location at the crossroads of trade routes made it wealthy and influential. But it was more than a marketplace—it was a center of Christian life. Back in the late 300s, Milan had been led by Ambrose, one of the most famous bishops in church history. Ambrose had written hymns that Christians still sing today. He had confronted emperors when they tried to dominate the church. And he mentored Augustine, who became one of Christianity’s greatest teachers. Because of Ambrose, Milan was not just politically strong—it was spiritually famous. Augustine later reflected that Milan’s churches, under Ambrose’s leadership, were a beacon...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分
  • 112 AD – Early Gatherings Confound Rome: Why Simple Worship Still Matters Today

    112 AD – Early Gatherings Confound Rome: Why Simple Worship Still Matters Today
    2025/09/01
    112 AD – Early Gatherings Confound Rome: Why Simple Worship Still Matters Today Published 9/1/2025 TIMESTAMPS [Cold Hook] 00:00 [Intro] 01:20 [Foundation] 02:46 [Development] 04:14 [Climax/Impact] 05:54 [Legacy & Modern Relevance] 07:36 [Reflection & Call] 09:18 [Outro] 11:34 📦 Metadata They thought Christians were rebels. But in 112 AD, Pliny the Younger discovered something else: believers who gathered at dawn to sing, pledge honesty, pray, and share a simple meal. Their worship was consistent, widespread, and stubbornly simple. Over the next centuries, writings from the Didache to Justin Martyr confirmed the same rhythms: Scripture, prayer, song, communion, generosity. No cathedrals. No programs. Just Jesus. This episode explores how that simplicity shaped the church’s endurance and asks if today’s worship still carries the same focus. Make sure you Like, Share, Subscribe, Follow, Comment, and Review this episode and the entire COACH series. Keywords Pliny the Younger, 112 AD, early Christian worship, simplicity, Didache, Justin Martyr, Tertullian, Hippolytus, communion, Scripture, prayer, church history, COACH podcast Hashtags #ChurchHistory #EarlyChurch #SimpleWorship #COACHPodcast #Pliny112AD Description In 112 AD, Pliny the Younger wrote to Emperor Trajan with a troubling report: Christians in his province weren’t rioting or plotting revolt—they were gathering before sunrise to sing to Christ, pledge honesty, and share a common meal. To Roman eyes it looked puzzling, harmless, even boring. But history shows it was far more. This episode of COACH traces the simple rhythms of worship that defined the early church. From Pliny’s interrogation to the Didache’s instructions, from Justin Martyr’s First Apology to Tertullian’s defense of the agape feast, we see a pattern emerge: believers gathered for Scripture, prayer, song, communion, and mutual care. Outsiders mocked them, emperors persecuted them, and critics dismissed them—but the simplicity endured. Even when Christians met in house churches, caves, or hidden rooms like Dura-Europos, their worship remained focused on Christ rather than spectacle. Over centuries, the same practices echoed in Africa, Gaul, Syria, and Rome. Today, the church often adds lights, stages, and production value. But the core question remains: would we still worship if we lost all of that? The simplicity of the early church reminds us that worship isn’t about impressing crowds but honoring Jesus together. 🎙 Transcript The Roman governor couldn’t make sense of it. In 112 AD, Pliny the Younger wrote to Emperor Trajan , reporting on the strange behavior of Christians in his province. They weren’t carrying weapons. They weren’t plotting rebellion. They simply gathered before sunrise on a fixed day of the week. And what did they do? They sang to Christ as if He were a god. They pledged to live honestly—no theft, no adultery, no lies. Then they shared a meal, something simple and sacred. No politics. No spectacle. Just devotion. To Pliny, it was puzzling. Harmless. Even boring. So why did he torture some, execute others, and pressure many to deny the name of Jesus? What disturbed him most wasn’t sedition. It was how consistent, widespread, and stubbornly simple their gatherings were. Pliny thought he had uncovered a curiosity. But what he stumbled onto was much older, much larger, and far more unstoppable than he imagined. Intro From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH — Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Mondays, we stay between 0 and 500 AD. Today we zoom in on the year 112 AD. But this isn’t a story about persecution trials, imperial decrees, or martyrs’ last words. It’s about worship. Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Bithynia, gave us a snapshot of what Christians were doing when they gathered. They weren’t staging protests or plotting revolution. They were meeting before sunrise to sing, to pray, to pledge honesty, and to share a simple meal in honor of Christ. What Pliny found so puzzling would soon be echoed by others—manuals, letters, and testimonies that confirmed the same pattern across continents. From Syria to Gaul, from North Africa to Rome, Christians gathered around Scripture, song, communion, and prayer. And that raises a question: Why did something so simple spread so far? Foundation The debate over Christians in 112 AD didn’t begin with riots or insurrections. It began with confusion. Pliny the Younger, governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor, admitted he didn’t know how to handle the growing number of Christians in his province. Unsure of their practices, he interrogated them under threat. Some he tortured. Some he executed. Others he pressed to deny Christ. And what did he learn? In his own words, they gathered before dawn on a fixed day and sang QUOTE “hymns to Christ as to a god” end quote. They pledged not to steal, commit adultery, or lie. Later, they met again for...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • 1885 AD – The Chicago–London Revival Ignites Global Evangelism: Ordinary Believers Multiply the Mission

    1885 AD – The Chicago–London Revival Ignites Global Evangelism: Ordinary Believers Multiply the Mission
    2025/08/29
    1885 AD – The Chicago–London Revival Ignites Global Evangelism: Ordinary Believers Multiply the Mission Published 8/29/2025 1885 AD – The Chicago–London Revival Ignites Global Evangelism: Ordinary Believers Multiply the Mission In 1885, Moody’s simple preaching and Sankey’s hymns shook Chicago and London. Can revival still spread through ordinary believers today? In 1885, Dwight L. Moody’s evangelistic campaigns in Chicago and London drew thousands through simple sermons and Ira Sankey’s hymns. More than events, they sparked lasting revival, launching Bible institutes, missions, and lay training. Moody’s interdenominational approach showed how ordinary believers could multiply the gospel worldwide. Dwight L. Moody’s 1885 revival meetings in Chicago and London were not just spectacles of mass attendance—they reshaped the future of evangelical outreach. Through plain preaching and heartfelt hymns, he reached across class and denominational lines. More importantly, his Northfield Conferences and Bible training empowered everyday Christians to share their faith with clarity and courage. The ripple effect touched missions, education, and global evangelism, influencing figures like Billy Sunday and Billy Graham. This episode challenges us to rethink revival: not as a headline event, but as countless individuals living out bold faith in ordinary places. If revival in 1885 spread through shoe salesmen, musicians, and lay workers, what might God do through you today? Dwight L. Moody, Ira Sankey, 1885 revival, Chicago revival, London revival, Northfield Conferences, global evangelism, urban revival, mass meetings, YMCA, Protestant churches, evangelistic campaigns, lay evangelists, hymns and preaching, interdenominational revival, Moody Bible Institute, missions movement, 19th-century revivalism, Billy Graham influence, revivalist fervor #ChurchHistory #Moody #Revival #Evangelism #GlobalMission If this episode encouraged you, would you take a moment to share it with a friend who needs to be reminded that God uses ordinary people for extraordinary purposes? And if you enjoy COACH, leaving a quick review on your podcast app helps others discover these stories. Be sure to follow for weekly episodes as we keep uncovering how God has worked through history to inspire faith today. TIMESTAMPS / Chapter Markers Cold Hook 00:00 Show Intro 01:15 Narrative Foundation 02:30 Narrative Development 04:14 Climax & Immediate Impact 05:59 Legacy & Modern Relevance 07:44 Reflection & Call to Action 09:09 In 1885, Dwight L. Moody’s revival campaigns swept across Chicago and London, igniting a movement that reshaped modern evangelical outreach. Moody was not a scholar or trained orator; he was a former shoe salesman who spoke in plain, direct words about sin, grace, and salvation. Crowds filled massive halls lit by gas lamps, eager to hear his gravelly voice and sing along with the powerful hymns led by Ira Sankey. Newspapers marveled at the scenes—lines stretching for blocks, choirs shaking theaters with songs of hope, and lives being transformed. But Moody’s impact was never just about events. His Northfield Conferences in Massachusetts gathered pastors, missionaries, and laypeople for days of preaching, prayer, and training. Participants left renewed, equipped to carry the gospel back into their neighborhoods and far beyond. Out of this vision grew the Chicago Evangelization Society, later Moody Bible Institute, dedicated to multiplying evangelists and missionaries. His interdenominational approach cut across barriers, drawing Anglicans, Baptists, Methodists, and others into shared mission without erasing their convictions. The revival also bore social fruit. YMCA records describe young people committing themselves to foreign missions and service among the urban poor. Evangelism, education, and reform became intertwined. Moody’s methods influenced Billy Sunday, Billy Graham, and countless others, shaping a recognizable pattern of modern mass evangelism—simple preaching, heartfelt music, and clear invitations. Sankey’s hymn collections spread worldwide, embedding the sound of revival into churches and homes. Critics at the time dismissed Moody’s approach as emotionalism, worried that mass meetings produced shallow converts. Yet the lasting evidence lies in churches strengthened, missionaries sent, and institutions founded. Moody himself deflected credit, insisting, “It is not my sermons, but God’s Spirit working through His Word.” His humility underscored the conviction that revival is God’s work, not man’s show. For today’s believers, Moody’s story raises pressing questions. Do we confuse large gatherings with genuine transformation? Are we equipping others to carry on the mission, or relying on a few leaders? The 1885 revival demonstrates that the gospel spreads most powerfully when ordinary Christians—teachers, workers, mothers, musicians—are trained and sent. Revival is ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    11 分
  • 1274 AD - Council of Lyons: True Unity Requires Forgiveness Beyond Friendly Words

    1274 AD - Council of Lyons: True Unity Requires Forgiveness Beyond Friendly Words
    2025/08/27
    1274 AD - Council of Lyons: True Unity Requires Forgiveness Beyond Friendly Words Publish Date 8/27/2025 50-Word Description In 1274, leaders of Western and Eastern Christianity met in Lyons, France, hoping to heal their centuries-old split. Emperor Michael VIII sent envoys to negotiate with Pope Gregory X. Agreements were signed, but distrust remained. The council’s fleeting unity attempt exposed deep divides and influenced church diplomacy for generations. 150-Word Description In 1274, the Second Council of Lyons [LYE-ons – city in France] aimed to reunite Eastern and Western Christianity. Pope Gregory X and Byzantine Emperor Michael VIII’s envoys signed agreements on papal authority and the Filioque [fill-EE-oh-kway], but Byzantine resistance unraveled the deal. The council’s failure revealed that unity requires trust, not just signatures. It shaped later reconciliation attempts, reminding us that true unity demands transformed hearts. This episode challenges us to live forgiveness, not just speak it, and to build bridges, not walls, in our relationships. Rooted in John 13:35, it asks: do we seek appearances of peace or genuine reconciliation? Keywords (≤500 characters) 1274, Second Council of Lyons, Pope Gregory X, Michael VIII Palaiologos, Byzantine envoys, church reunion attempt, East-West Schism, papal primacy, Filioque controversy, George Pachymeres, Thomas of Cantimpré, medieval councils, crusade planning, clerical reforms, Roman Catholic history, Eastern Orthodox history, Lyons France 1274, medieval diplomacy, church unity failure, ecclesiastical politics, Middle Ages. Hashtags #ChurchHistory #CouncilofLyons #MedievalFaith #ChristianUnity #EastWestSchism Transcript The air in Lyons, France, buzzed with tension. Cardinals, monks, and envoys filled the streets, their robes brushing against merchants and townsfolk who could hardly believe what was happening in their city. Inside the great hall, banners of the West hung beside the crests of Byzantium. For the first time in centuries, leaders from divided halves of Christianity faced one another across the same table. On one side sat representatives of Pope Gregory X, eager to claim a long-awaited reunion. On the other stood envoys from the city of Constantinople and the Byzantine emperor, Michael VIII, carrying the hopes—and the suspicions—of the Eastern church. Would centuries of hostility end with signatures on parchment? Or would the wounds between East and West prove deeper than ceremony could heal? The stakes were enormous: faith, politics, and the fragile hope that Christians could again speak with one voice. History was about to test whether unity was real—or only a word. From the That’s Jesus Channel, welcome to COACH—where we trace Church Origins and Church History. I’m Bob Baulch. On Wednesdays, we stay between 500 and 1500 AD. Today we turn to the year 1274, when church leaders gathered in the city of Lyons, France, to attempt something bold: heal the centuries-old split between the Roman Catholic Church in the West and the Eastern Orthodox Church in the East. Pope Gregory X convened the council. Emperor Michael VIII sent delegates. They sat beneath the same vaulted roof, trading words in hopes of reunion. Western voices pressed for recognition of papal authority and the Western confession of faith. Eastern envoys carried the weight of a suspicious people back home. The meeting was not only about theology—it was about power, politics, and the fragile trust needed for reconciliation. Agreements were signed, but the deeper question remained: could hearts divided for centuries truly be made one? To understand why the council of 1274 mattered, we need to look back. For centuries, Eastern and Western Christianity had grown apart. Language was one barrier—Greek in the East, Latin in the West. Culture was another—emperors and patriarchs in Constantinople, popes and princes in Rome. By 1054 the strain erupted into open division, remembered as the Great Schism. Fast forward to the thirteenth century. The Eastern Empire was weak, its capital of Constantinople only recently recovered from a Western crusader occupation. Emperor Michael, desperate to secure allies, saw reconciliation with Rome as a survival strategy. If he could win papal favor, he might gain Western military support against new threats from the Turks. On the other side, Pope Gregory longed to rally Christendom for another crusade. But he knew a fractured church could not fight with one voice. A council, he believed, could repair the breach. So he called bishops, abbots, and theologians to meet in Lyons, a French city along the Rhône River. From the East came solemn delegates carrying the emperor’s promises. From the West came a throng of church leaders, determined to settle doctrine and discipline. For a brief moment, two worlds that had once walked side by side but then drifted apart came face to face again. Inside the council chamber, ...
    続きを読む 一部表示
    12 分