Most supervisors are comfortable giving feedback. Far fewer have a system for evaluating supervisees.

In this episode, I sit down with Dr. Ashley Stephens Durbin to unpack the difference between feedback and formal evaluation, and why that distinction matters more than most supervisors realize.

We discuss what happens when concerns are discussed but never documented, why evaluation protects both supervisors and supervisees, and how to build an evaluation process that supports growth without turning supervision into a performance review.

We also explore one of the biggest misconceptions in supervision. Many supervisors assume evaluations create tension. In reality, clear expectations and documented feedback often strengthen the supervisory relationship because everyone knows where they stand.

Whether you're supervising associates, graduate students, or social workers, this episode will help you create a process that is ethical, practical, and sustainable.

In this episode, you'll learn:

• Why feedback and formal evaluation are not the same thing
• How documentation protects supervisors, supervisees, and clients
• What to include in a practical supervisee evaluation process
• How evaluations create growth plans instead of surprises

If you've been avoiding evaluations because they feel uncomfortable, this conversation will help you rethink their purpose. Evaluation is not about punishment. It is about creating clarity, accountability, and measurable growth.

Want to learn more? Check out this month's free resource from Kate Walker Training.

If this episode raised questions about evaluation, documentation, supervision contracts, or difficult conversations with supervisees, those are exactly the conversations we continue inside the Step It Up Membership. You'll find practical tools, ethical guidance, and a community of supervisors working to build supervision practices that are structured, compliant, and designed for growth.

Get your step by step guide to private practice. Because you are too important to lose to not knowing the rules, going broke, burning out, and giving up. #counselorsdontquit.

If you work with clients, chances are you are already working with someone who is bisexual or pansexual, whether they have disclosed it to you or not. In this episode, Joyce Miles Jacquote joins me to unpack what bisexual and pansexual clients are actually navigating behind the scenes and what therapists need to understand to provide affirming, ethical care.

We talk about minority stress, identity concealment, community belonging, and why bisexual and pansexual individuals often experience marginalization both outside and inside queer spaces. Joyce also walks through the mental health impacts clinicians are most likely to encounter, including depression, anxiety, internalized stigma, and relationship stress.

One part of this conversation that really stood out to me was the discussion around invisibility. Clients in straight-presenting or same-gender relationships are often told, directly or indirectly, that their bisexuality no longer “counts.” That erasure has real emotional consequences and therapists need to know how to recognize it.

We also spend time discussing faith, identity conflict, and what authentic living can look like for clients navigating conservative religious systems. This conversation is practical, compassionate, and deeply relevant for therapists working in any setting.

In this episode, you’ll learn:

• Why bisexual and pansexual clients often delay disclosure in therapy
• How minority stress affects mental health outcomes
• What identity concealment can look like clinically
• Why community belonging matters for bisexual and pansexual clients
• How therapists can create more affirming clinical environments

Connect with Joyce at Overcoming Miles Counseling.

Want to learn more? Check out this month's free resource from Kate Walker Training.

If this episode raised questions about documentation, supervision, or ethical LGBTQ+ affirming care, those are exactly the conversations we continue inside the Step It Up Membership.

Get your step by step guide to private practice. Because you are too important to lose to not knowing the rules, going broke, burning out, and giving up. #counselorsdontquit.

A hybrid practice can feel flexible and efficient, until the lack of structure starts creating problems.

When therapists move between telehealth and in-person sessions without a clear system, small decisions quickly turn into ethical, logistical, and clinical challenges. Questions about HIPAA, crisis management, informed consent, and scheduling all become harder when there is no defined default.

In this episode, I walk through what therapists need to consider before offering a hybrid counseling model. We look at how to decide between virtual and in-person care, where clinicians often underestimate risk, and why your policies matter more than your preferences.

This episode is less about technology and more about decision-making.

In this episode, we cover:

• How to create a clear default for telehealth versus in-person sessions
• Why informed consent and crisis planning matter in hybrid practice
• What therapists misunderstand about HIPAA, AI, and physical privacy
• How cognitive load and scheduling affect sustainability in practice

If your hybrid model currently depends on convenience or case-by-case decisions, this episode will help you build a structure that is easier to manage and easier to defend ethically.

Want to learn more? Check out this month's free resource from Kate Walker Training.

Want deeper support? Inside the Step It Up Membership, we work through policies, documentation systems, supervision structure, and private practice operations in a way that supports both clinical integrity and long-term sustainability.

Get your step by step guide to private practice. Because you are too important to lose to not knowing the rules, going broke, burning out, and giving up. #counselorsdontquit.