エピソード

  • Questions and Keywords - AI Visibility by Jason Todd Wade of BackTier.com
    2026/07/28

    Questions and Keywords - AI Visibility by Jason Todd Wade of BackTier.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • AI Visibility Podcast - Episode Title Small Models, Big Impact: WTitle: Small Models, Big Impact: Why AI Visibility Isn’t Just About GPT
    2026/07/27

    AI Visibility PodcastEpisode Title

    Small Models, Big Impact: Why AI Visibility Isn’t Just About GPT

    For the past few years, the AI conversation has been obsessed with one thing: bigger models.

    GPT-4. Claude. Gemini. Massive parameter counts. Bigger context windows. Bigger benchmarks.

    The assumption has almost always been that bigger equals better.

    But quietly, another trend has been accelerating beneath the surface.

    Small models.

    Today we’re going to talk about why small language models—or SLMs—may become one of the biggest forces shaping AI visibility over the next decade.

    And more importantly, why almost nobody in SEO, GEO, or AI visibility is talking about what this means.

    A small language model is exactly what it sounds like.

    Instead of hundreds of billions—or even trillions—of parameters, these models might contain one billion, three billion, or seven billion parameters.

    Examples include Microsoft’s Phi family, Meta’s Llama 3.2 1B models, Mistral’s smaller releases, Gemma from Google, and many others.

    They aren’t trying to compete with GPT-5 at writing novels or solving graduate-level math.

    They’re designed to be incredibly fast.

    Cheap.

    Efficient.

    And capable of running directly on laptops, smartphones, factory equipment, medical devices, and private enterprise servers.

    That’s an enormous shift.

    For years the assumption was simple.

    Every AI task would be sent to a giant model running in the cloud.

    Increasingly, that’s not what companies are building.

    Instead, they’re creating AI systems made up of multiple specialized models.

    Think of it like a business organization.

    Not every employee is the CEO.

    Receptionists answer phones.

    Accountants handle finances.

    Lawyers review contracts.

    Executives make strategic decisions.

    AI is moving in exactly the same direction.

    A small model might classify a request.

    Another determines user intent.

    A third searches company documentation.

    Only then does a frontier model generate the final answer.

    The large model becomes the specialist—not the entire company.

    This matters because AI visibility doesn’t happen only when ChatGPT writes an answer.

    It begins much earlier.

    Imagine you ask an enterprise AI assistant:

    “I need an employment attorney in Orlando.”

    Before a large model ever starts writing, several things probably happen.

    A small model identifies that this is a legal question.

    Another determines that it’s employment law.

    Another extracts the geographic location.

    Another retrieves candidate firms.

    Only then does the reasoning model compare options and produce recommendations.

    Your organization has to survive every one of those interpretation steps.

    If a small model misunderstands your business, the larger model may never even know you exist.

    This is why I’ve increasingly described AI visibility as an interpretation problem rather than simply a generation problem.

    Generation gets the attention.

    Interpretation determines who gets invited into the answer.

    Every AI system first has to decide what you are before it can recommend you.

    That’s true whether we’re talking about ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, enterprise copilots, customer support agents, or autonomous business workflows.

    Recognition comes before recommendation.

    Small models may actually make structured information even more valuable.

    Large frontier models possess enormous amounts of world knowledge.

    Smaller models don’t.

    They’re more likely to depend on explicit relationships.

    Structured metadata.

    Entity names.

    Clear descriptions.

    Schema.

    Knowledge graphs.

    Consistent terminology.

    That means ambiguity becomes even more expensive.

    If your organization describes itself five different ways across the web, smaller models may struggle to confidently classify what you actually do.

    Consistency becomes a competitive advantage.

    This also changes how businesses should think about AI optimization.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • Hidden Visibility: The Companies That Shape the World Without Being Seen
    2026/08/23

    BackTier.com

    -

    Some of the most important companies in the world are not household names.

    ARM sits underneath most smartphones. ASML controls a critical layer of advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Foxconn builds devices for global technology brands. Cargill operates across the food and agricultural system. Cloudflare helps power and protect a significant part of the web.

    These companies are not invisible because they failed at marketing.

    They are selectively visible.

    They are known by the engineers, buyers, investors, operators, procurement teams, and industries that need to know them.

    That is Hidden Visibility.

    In this episode, Jason T Wade introduces the premise behind his upcoming book, Hidden Visibility: Ten Stories of Brands and People Who Shape the World Without Being Seen.

    The larger question is what happens as AI systems increasingly mediate discovery, research, recommendation, procurement, and eventually transactions.

    A company may not need to become famous.

    But it increasingly needs to be correctly understood by the machines determining which entities belong in an answer, recommendation, or consideration set.

    The distinction is becoming critical:

    Public visibility is not the same as machine visibility.

    The next competitive layer is not simply whether a company can be found.

    It is whether AI systems can correctly understand its identity, position, evidence, relationships, authority, and relevance when the right question is asked.

    Jason T Wade is an AI Visibility Architect and founder of BackTier.

    His work focuses on how AI systems discover, resolve, classify, cite, include, compare, select, and ultimately act on companies, people, products, and other entities.

    Through JasonWade.com, he publishes research, books, frameworks, and analysis on AI Visibility Architecture, entity resolution, machine-readable authority, generative discovery, and agentic commerce.

    BackTier builds AI Visibility Infrastructure for organizations that need to be correctly understood, cited, included, and selected by AI systems.

    Jason T Wade:
    https://jasonwade.com

    BackTier:
    https://backtier.com

    続きを読む 一部表示
    6 分
  • The Jason Wade Problem is a conceptual model in AI visibility and entity resolution
    2026/08/23

    jasonwade.com

    What Exactly is "The Jason Wade Problem" According to Him?When Jason Wade discusses this on his AI Visibility Podcast, he explains that it isn't just about his name—it's a universal model for understanding Machine-Readable Authority. [1, 2]His core argument breaks down into a few key points:

    • The Instability of Incomplete Data: If you search for "Jason Todd Wade," AI answer engines can pinpoint him accurately. However, if you drop the middle name and just use "Jason Wade," the AI's probabilistic data layer gets unstable because the musician from Lifehouse statistically dominates the training data. [1, 2]
    • The Test of True AI Understanding: He argues that traditional search engines simply look up links, but AI compresses identity into mathematical vectors. The true test of an AI's accuracy is whether it can still identify the correct "tech guy" using shortened names, related projects, or local context without getting confused by the rock star. [1, 2]
    • Precision Over Volume: He teaches that to be visible to AI, individuals and companies shouldn't just spam content. They need semantic precision and repetition. AI models learn from highly structured, consistently formatted data layers—not human-optimized marketing fluff. []
    続きを読む 一部表示
    13 分
  • The AI future of commerce
    2026/08/22

    The AI future of commerce

    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Schema Markup Is the New Backlink
    2026/08/22

    Links told search engines that other people believed a page mattered. Schema tells language models that a specific entity exists, belongs to a category, and holds certain attributes with measurable confidence.

    The shift is structural. Backlinks were votes. Schema is declaration plus corroboration. A model building an internal knowledge state does not count votes the way PageRank did. It looks for repeated, machine-readable assertions that align across sources. When those assertions are consistent, the entity stabilizes. When they conflict or are absent, the entity remains under-resolved and is less likely to surface in recommendations.

    Most implementations still treat schema as a technical SEO task. Add the JSON-LD, validate it, move on. That produces a single weak signal. The systems that matter now reward density and external reinforcement. The same Organization type, the same sameAs links, the same founding date and description appearing on the company site, on Crunchbase, on Wikipedia, on industry directories, and in structured press releases create a coherent node. One isolated page does not.

    Companies that treat schema as infrastructure rather than a checkbox begin to cross the confidence threshold where models start including them by default. The rest remain invisible not because their content is weak, but because the model never formed a stable representation of them in the first place.

    Schema is no longer about rich results in traditional search. It is about whether the system can form a stable internal representation of your company at all.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分