エピソード

  • October 19, 2025 Gratitude Is Not Optional
    2025/10/21

    What if gratitude isn’t a seasonal sentiment but a moral obligation that reshapes who we become? We take on a single line from the Eucharistic prayer—“It is right and just, our duty and our salvation, always and everywhere to give you thanks”—and follow it all the way from Sunday liturgy into everyday life. With a professor, a priest, a millennial engineer, and a rabbi at the table, we examine why failing to thank the Giver isn’t just impolite; it’s untrue, unjust, and spiritually dangerous.

    We begin with the simple claim that gratitude is “right.” If every breath and moment is a gift, silence isn’t neutral—it’s wrong. From there we dig into “just,” drawing on the classical idea that justice gives each their due. If God is Creator, acknowledgment is due. We talk about the sting of ingratitude, the way entitlement blinds us like a goldfish that can’t see the water, and how the Eucharist itself is thanksgiving that trains our hearts to notice grace.

    Then we tackle “duty,” pushing back on the modern impulse to ask, “What do I get out of it?” Commanded thanksgiving doesn’t drain love; it sustains it. Duty carries us to worship when feelings lag and, paradoxically, often returns the joy we thought we lacked.

    Finally, we explore why thanksgiving is tied to “our salvation.” Ingratitude bends the soul inward and fractures the relationship with God and neighbor. Gratitude, practiced “always and everywhere,” isn’t about thanking God for evil; it’s about thanking God within every circumstance, naming mercies without romanticizing pain.

    Along the way, we share morning prayers, stories about missed obligations, and practical ways to cultivate a habit of thanks that spills into justice, generosity, and hope.

    If this conversation nudged you to notice even one overlooked gift today, share the episode with a friend, subscribe for more thoughtful dialogues, and leave a review telling us where you’re practicing “always and everywhere” gratitude this week.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    54 分
  • October 12, 2025 What we pass on at the table shapes what a nation becomes
    2025/10/13

    What if the most radical act in a restless culture is setting a longer table? We gather to explore why family remains the quiet powerhouse behind character, faith, and civic health. From Genesis’ one-flesh vision to Jeremiah’s intimate language of being known, we unpack how Scripture frames marriage and parenting as a covenant that forms us for love, duty, and joy.

    Along the way, we contrast the timeless constancy of parental love with the churn of modern courtship—from village matchmakers to swipe-right apps—and ask what we might have traded for convenience.

    Our conversation gets candid about real pressures: fewer marriages, declining birth rates, thinner congregational life, and the lure of hyper‑individualism that treats people like brands and beliefs like identities. We share personal stories—airport chaos with toddlers, a mother’s fierce devotion that “infects” her son with faith, and a European encounter where work eclipsed wonder—to show how ideas filter into daily life. The throughline is clear: faith is often caught, not taught; homes are schools of virtue where truth becomes habit and love learns to keep its promises. Family is not merely a legal arrangement; it’s a covenantal craft that requires sacrifice for the person and for the relationship.

    Still, we’re hopeful. False scripts eventually exhaust themselves, and the hunger for belonging returns. We outline practical ways to rebuild from the inside out: shared meals, sabbath rhythms, honest apologies, intergenerational friendships, and communities that honor mothers, fathers, and spiritual kin. Whether your household is bustling with kids or held together by chosen family, you’ll find encouragement, challenge, and a vision sturdy enough to live by. If this resonates, share it with someone you love, subscribe for more thoughtful conversations, and leave a review to help others find the show.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • October 5, 2025 Providence, Plain and Unseen
    2025/10/13

    What if the world isn’t a loose chain of accidents but a held story—with freedom that matters and guidance you can trust? We take an unflinching look at divine providence: how Jefferson and Adams spoke of it, why Washington leaned on it, and where that old vocabulary still speaks to modern hearts wrestling with chaos, choice, and meaning.

    We trace the classic idea that God sustains creation moment by moment—“powerful, yet gentle”—without erasing human agency. Along the way, we challenge the cult of pure autonomy and the shallow promise of happiness chased apart from righteousness. One thread runs through it all: evil moves fast and breaks things, but good has weight, permanence, and the quiet strength to outlast. From a priest’s personal story of guidance through setbacks, to a philosopher’s take on evil as privation, to a rabbi’s reminder that blessings train us to see the pantry of the earth as gift, this conversation is both rigorous and human. We put reason in its right place, honoring its reach and admitting its limits, and we ask what science actually discovers versus what it creates.

    If Providence ties a nation’s lasting joy to the virtue of its people, then formation matters—at home, in community, and in public life. The simple test we offer is practical: does this choice build or break? Does it cultivate what’s been entrusted, or corrode it? Come for the founders’ quotes; stay for a hard-won hope that neither denies suffering nor surrenders to it. If this resonates, subscribe, share with a friend who loves philosophy and history, and leave a review with one place you’ve seen quiet guidance in your own life.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • September 14, 2025 Faith, Violence, and the Permission to Kill
    2025/10/13

    A week like this forces hard questions to the surface. A beloved public figure is killed from a rooftop in Utah, a young woman bleeds out on a train in North Carolina, and a familiar claim spreads online: maybe speech is violence.

    We lean into the discomfort and ask what a faithful response to political violence really looks like—without surrendering either courage or charity.

    We begin by defining political violence and then test that definition against the facts, not the feeds. From there, we examine the “permission structures” that heat the civic pot: when rhetoric treats disagreement as erasure, when leniency erodes public safety, and when televised horror makes the rare feel routine.

    The conversation turns to Catholic moral reasoning—self-defense, just war, and Richard John Neuhaus’s stark line: “Violence, when justified, is not an option but a sad duty.” We revisit the Vatican’s clandestine choices during World War II to frame how moral agency can resist evil without performative outrage that costs lives.

    The second half navigates the most delicate claim: did this killing bear the marks of martyrdom? We weigh the public witness of faith, the hatred that targets it, and the paradox that assassination often amplifies a message instead of silencing it. Along the way, we grapple with data showing long-term declines in violent crime, even as our screens deliver cruelty in real time, and we discuss practical changes—from event security to the way we argue on campus and online—that can temper the temperature without curbing free speech.

    If you’re looking for tidy answers, you won’t find them here. What you will hear is a clear moral spine: forgive what feels unforgivable because grace reached us first; tell the truth without venom; defend the innocent without celebrating force; and keep the public square open to complex questions. If that resonates, follow the show, share this episode with a friend who thinks deeply, and leave a review to help others find the conversation.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • August 1, 2025 When Robots Write Your Sermons
    2025/08/12

    The fourth great revolution of human history is already here, and it's transforming every aspect of society faster than we can comprehend. Artificial intelligence has arrived barely two decades into the new millennium, following the printing, industrial, and digital revolutions that reshaped previous centuries.

    Our panel explores the profound implications of AI through the lens of faith and ethics.

    How does AI impact education when students can generate papers without absorbing knowledge? What happens to workers displaced by technology? Can artificial intelligence truly create meaningful sermons or is something essentially human lost in the process? And what does Pope Leo XIV's recent message on technology's dehumanizing potential mean for people of faith?

    We discover both promise and peril in AI's rapid advance. Medical applications that analyze millions of scans to improve diagnoses. Construction tools that detect dangerous structural flaws before they cause harm. Productivity enhancements that free humans from mundane tasks. Yet alongside these benefits lurk serious concerns about deep fakes, scams, and the fundamental question of whether machines can truly replace human creativity and wisdom.

    The conversation takes a particularly fascinating turn when examining work through theological perspectives. As beings created in God's image with an innate drive to create and contribute, what happens when machines take over traditionally human roles? Our panelists argue that regardless of technological advancement, humans will always need meaningful work and creative outlets to fulfill their divine purpose.

    As we navigate this brave new world of artificial intelligence, join us in exploring how faith traditions might guide our relationship with these powerful tools. Will we harness AI to enhance human flourishing, or will we surrender essential aspects of our humanity in pursuit of efficiency? The choices we make today will shape generations to come.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • July 20, 2025 Reconnecting Through Silence: The Art of Listening in Prayer
    2025/07/21

    What if everything you thought about prayer is backward? What if the real power of prayer isn't in what you say to God, but in what you allow God to say to you?

    This eye-opening conversation challenges the conventional understanding of prayer across religious traditions. Through the lens of the Martha and Mary story from Luke's Gospel, we discover that Jesus wasn't criticizing service itself, but rather the anxious spirit that prevents true presence. The "better part" that Mary chose wasn't laziness but the posture of a disciple – sitting, listening, and receiving.

    Our interfaith panel unpacks the etymology of "religion" itself – coming from "religio," meaning to reconnect. This fundamental insight reveals the true purpose of prayer: not to change God's mind, but to allow ourselves to be transformed through divine encounter. The Catholic concept of "concupiscence" (our tendency toward disordered desires) meets the Jewish understanding of prayer as attunement, creating a rich theological tapestry that transcends denominational boundaries.

    We explore the balance between structured prayer (what Judaism calls "kevah") and heartfelt intention ("kavanah"), recognizing that both serve essential spiritual functions. The panel shares practical wisdom about contemplative versus active prayer, petition versus thanksgiving, and how even our service can become prayer when done with the right spirit.

    Whether you're spiritually curious or deeply devout, this conversation offers a fresh perspective on how prayer can become less about religious performance and more about authentic connection. By shifting from speaking to listening, we discover the transformative power of true presence with the divine.

    Ready to revolutionize your prayer life? Listen now and discover what happens when we finally stop talking and start truly hearing.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • July 6. 2025 Special: Ask Us Anything
    2025/07/08

    What happens when ancient wisdom meets modern questions? When a rabbi, priest, professor, and millennial tackle your deepest spiritual curiosities, the result is a fascinating exploration of faith that transcends traditional boundaries.

    Tonight's episode takes a different approach as our interfaith panel responds to listener questions about everything from biblical serpents to the limits of government authority. The conversation begins with a poignant acknowledgment of the devastating floods in Central Texas, reminding us that even amid theological discussions, real human suffering demands our attention and response.

    Diving into Genesis 3, we discover striking differences between Jewish and Christian interpretations. Rabbi reads the serpent narrative literally—snakes are just snakes—while our Christian panelists see something more sinister lurking beneath the surface. This seemingly simple difference opens a window into how various faith traditions approach sacred texts and reveals the roots of theological divergence that has shaped centuries of religious thought.

    The most provocative moments emerge when we grapple with the relationship between faith and governance. Can virtue be legislated? Our panel unanimously recognizes the limits of law in creating moral citizens while acknowledging its role in protecting shared values. "A society that doesn't recognize there is a law above the law becomes tyranny of majority will," quotes Rudy, capturing the delicate balance between religious conviction and civil authority.

    Perhaps most relatable is our honest examination of religious practices across traditions. When a listener questions whether giving up meat on Fridays during Lent truly compares to the rigorous fasting of Ramadan, Father Mario candidly admits the criticism has merit. The conversation reveals how easily meaningful spiritual disciplines can devolve into empty rituals when divorced from their purpose.

    Whether you're questioning the divine inspiration of scripture, wondering about religious conversion, or simply curious about how different faiths approach self-discipline, this episode offers thoughtful perspectives without easy answers. Join us in this candid interfaith dialogue where difficult questions lead to deeper understanding.

    続きを読む 一部表示
    55 分
  • June 22, 2025 When Matter Becomes Holy: Our Relationship with Sacred Objects
    2025/07/03

    What makes an object sacred? Is it divine designation, human recognition, or something else entirely? Our interfaith panel dives deep into the fascinating world of sacred objects and their role in connecting us to the transcendent.

    Father Mario offers a compelling metaphor: at creation, all matter possessed a mirror-like quality designed to reflect divine light. Though this reflective potential was diminished through human sin, the incarnation of Christ began the restoration process, allowing physical objects to once again mediate divine presence. This theology explains why Catholics value sacred objects so highly—from Eucharistic elements to blessed crucifixes, these items serve as tangible connections to spiritual realities.

    The conversation takes unexpected turns as panel members share personally meaningful sacred objects. David speaks movingly about his son's ashes, while Father Mario mentions his late father's bathrobe—simple everyday items transformed into profound connections with loved ones who have passed on. As Rabbi notes, "holy" simply means "set apart"—different and special from ordinary things.

    Perhaps most fascinating is the scientific dimension. Recent neuroscience research reveals that when people encounter objects they consider sacred, specific brain regions activate—particularly areas associated with emotional significance and memory. This suggests humans may be biologically wired to experience transcendence through physical things.

    Despite growing secularism, the panel observes hopeful signs of religious revival—increasing baptisms, conversions, and Bible sales indicate that purely materialistic worldviews have failed to satisfy the human hunger for meaning. Even those without religious faith still treat certain objects as sacred, suggesting our need for physical reminders of spiritual connections is universal and deeply human.

    Join us as we explore this profound paradox: the very objects meant to unite believers with the divine often become the things that create our deepest divisions. What can we learn from the way we all—religious or not—honor certain objects as special and set apart?

    続きを読む 一部表示
    不明