
6. Doesn't Scripture Quote the Book of Enoch?
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
このコンテンツについて
Can we trust the Book of Enoch? The hosts dive into the most commonly cited extra-biblical source for the Nephilim theory. They discuss the book’s historical context, contradictions, and alleged connection to the New Testament. Spoiler: the biblical text comes out on top.
The provided text offers a critical examination of the Book of Enoch, arguing against its use in interpreting biblical narratives, particularly concerning the Nephilim. The author asserts that the Book of Enoch is a pseudepigraphal work, likely written millennia after the biblical Enoch, and filled with numerous contradictions and falsehoods when compared to the Bible. It highlights how the Book of Enoch's depiction of giants, angelic procreation, and theological concepts diverges significantly from biblical teachings, even going so far as to attribute messianic qualities to Enoch himself. Furthermore, the text addresses the common belief that the New Testament alludes to or quotes Enoch, suggesting that such interpretations are often based on misreadings or shared oral traditions rather than direct textual reliance. Ultimately, the author advocates for a hermeneutic where scripture interprets scripture, cautioning against allowing external, potentially uninspired texts like the Book of Enoch to shape one's understanding of the Bible. Buy Book