28. Di soggetti, verbi e allineamenti: ergatività per gente normale (o quasi)
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
28. Di soggetti, verbi e allineamenti: ergatività per gente normale (o quasi)
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
このコンテンツについて
Diamo anche un’occhiata a fenomeni un po' strani che troviamo in italiano che, pur non rendendolo una lingua ergativa, mostrano comportamenti che ci fanno riflettere su cosa significhi davvero essere un “soggetto”.
Grafiche: Gianluca La Bruna
La sigla è stata prodotta da White Hot e fornita da https://freebeats.io
FONTI:
- Anderson, S. (1976). On the notion of subject in ergative languages. In C. Li (Ed.) Subject and topic (pp. 1-24). New York, NY: New York Academic Press.
- Barðdal, J. & Eythórsson, T. (2009). The origin of the oblique-subject construction: An Indo-European comparison. In V. Bubenik, J. Hewson & S. Rose (Ed.), Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages: Papers presented at the workshop on Indo-European Linguistics at the XVIIIth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Montreal, 2007 (pp. 179-193). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Belletti, A. & Rizzi, L. (1988), Psych verbs and theta theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6:291-352.
- Bertoncin, C. (2006). Ergatività. Quaderni del laboratorio di linguistica, 6:1-13.
- Breen, G. (2007). The grammar of Yalarnnga: a language of western Queensland. Canberra, ACT: Pacific Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.
- Centineo, G. (1986). A lexical theory of auxiliary selection in Italian. Davis Working Papers in Linguistics, 1:1-35.
- Comrie, B. (1978). Ergativity. In W.P. Lehmann (Ed.) Syntactic typology: Studies in the phenomenology of language (pp. 329-394). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
- Coon, J. (2013). Aspects of split ergativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Creissels, D. (2010). Fluid intransitivity in Romance languages: a typological approach. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 2:117-151.
- DeLancey, S. (2004). The blue bird of ergativity. In S. Gildea, & F. Queixalós (Eds.) Ergativity in Amazonia, 3:1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Dixon, R.M.W. (1979). Ergativity. Language, 55(1): 59-138.
- Dixon, R.M.W. (1994). Ergativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
- Dunn, V. & Meakins, F. (2023). Ergativity. In C. Bowern (Ed.), The Oxford guide to Australian languages (pp. 217–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lonzi, L. (2009). Caratteri della cliticizzazione di ne. Rivista di grammatica generativa, 34:115-135
- Loporcaro, M (2008). L’allineamento attivo-inattivo e il rapporto fra lessico e morfosintassi. In: M. Cresti (Ed.) Prospettive nello studio del lessico italiano: Atti del IX Congresso SILFI (Firenze, 14-17 giugno 2006) (pp. 311-320). Firenze: Firenze University Press.
- Moravcsik, E.A. (1978). On the distribution of ergative and accusative patterns. Lingua 45:233–279.
- Morgan, M.W. (2009a). Cross-linguistic typology of argument encoding in Sign Language verbal morphology. Paper presented at Association of Linguistic Typology, Berkeley.
- Morgan, M.W. (2009b). Typology of Indian Sign Language Verbs from a Comparative Perspective. Annual Review of South Asian Languages and Linguistics (pp. 101-132). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
- Sensini, M. (2009). La grammatica della lingua italiana. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore.
- Tallerman, M. (2019). Understanding Syntax (5th ed.). Chapter 6. New York: Routledge