『Why Shadow Banking Didn’t Cause the Financial Crisis』のカバーアート

Why Shadow Banking Didn’t Cause the Financial Crisis

And Why Regulating Contagion Won’t Help

プレビューの再生
Amazonプライム会員限定
プレミアムプラン 3か月間無料体験キャンペーン
プレミアムプランに登録する
2026年7月15日(水)まで
2026年7月15日(水)までプレミアムプラン 3か月間無料体験キャンペーン開催中。300円分のKindle本クーポンも。詳しくはこちら
オーディオブック・ポッドキャスト・オリジナル作品など数十万以上の対象作品が聴き放題
オーディオブックをお得な会員価格で購入できます
4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます

Why Shadow Banking Didn’t Cause the Financial Crisis

著者: Norbert J. Michel
ナレーター: Michael Lyons
プレミアムプランに登録する

Amazonプライム会員限定、プレミアムプラン 3か月間無料体験キャンペーン開催中。4か月目以降は月額1,500円で自動更新します。いつでも退会できます。2026年7月15日(水)まで。

¥1,470 で購入

¥1,470 で購入

Most American adults easily recognize the following description of the 2008 financial crisis. Unregulated Wall Street firms (so-called shadow banks) made too many risky bets with derivatives, causing the housing bubble to burst. The contagious run through the financial system was only stopped by bailouts from the federal government and major regulatory changes. But what if the record demonstrates that the core of this story is misleading and that the resulting regulations are misguided?

Now, almost 15 years later, the Biden administration is using this same story to promote more regulations for money market mutual funds (a key part of the supposedly dangerous shadow banking system) and even to justify allowing only federally insured banks to issue stablecoins (a type of cryptocurrency that didn’t exist in 2008). But most of the post-2008 regulatory efforts were concentrated in the traditional banking sector—not the shadow banking sector—which warrants skepticism toward the conventional story of the 2008 crisis and any new regulations based on that story.

This book explores the main problems with the conventional story about the 2008 crisis and explains why it does not justify expanding bank-like regulations throughout financial markets to mitigate systemic risks.

©2022 Cato Institute (P)2023 Cato Institute
銀行・銀行業
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません