Point Counter Point
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
プレミアムプラン4か月 月額99円キャンペーン開催中
Point Counter Point
￥3,970 で購入
-
ナレーター：
-
Stefan Rudnicki
-
著者：
-
Aldous Huxley
“Everybody strains after happiness, and the result is that nobody’s happy.”
In music, counterpoint is the art of writing melodies that play in conjunction with one another, according to a strict set of rules, in order to emphasize the melody by contrast. In debate, point/counterpoint is a means of persuasion in which the speaker begins by conceding to their opponent’s argument before refuting it wholeheartedly. Aldous Huxley follows these traditions in his masterpiece Point Counter Point.
The polarity between passion and reason in the intellectual life of the 1920s is demonstrated both in form and in theme in Huxley’s ambitious satire: This complex novel darts around points of view to portray the convoluted nature of perception versus reality, and it boasts a large cast of characters that come together, almost as an orchestra, performing separate melodies that coalesce in one great symphony.
Not only do these characters serve such a musical purpose in the plot but they also represent real life writers who were popular at the time, such as D. H. Lawrence, Katherine Mansfield, John Middleton Murry, and even Huxley himself, in the form of Phillip Quarles, the “novelist” within the novel.
(P)2024 Blackstone Publishing批評家のレビュー
“A splendid narration by Golden Voice Stefan Rudnicki. His exceptionally clear enunciation and steady pace help listeners take in what is arguably Huxley’s most complex work…Rudnicki’s resonant timbre and intelligent tone bring forth the author’s astute observations on class, wealth inequity, music, religion, family, love, and childhood illness.”
(AudioFile)“Out of colossal disillusion Huxley has made Point Counter Point the most scintillating, the most bitter, and the most serious of his novels. It is a notable piece of work.”
(Outlook)“The aim of this book is not idle amusement for the sophisticated but a grasping of the intellectual Zeitgeist and a biting criticism of it.”
(New York Times)