Audible会員プラン登録で、12万以上の対象タイトルが聴き放題。

  • In Search of Memory

  • The Emergence of a New Science of Mind
  • 著者: Eric R. Kandel
  • ナレーター: James Anderson Foster
  • 再生時間: 14 時間 41 分
  • 4.0 out of 5 stars (2件のカスタマーレビュー)

Audible会員プラン 無料体験

会員は、12万以上の対象作品が聴き放題
オフライン再生可能
プロの声優や俳優の朗読も楽しめる
Audibleでしか聴けない本やポッドキャストも多数
無料体験終了後は月会費1,500円。いつでも退会できます
『In Search of Memory』のカバーアート

In Search of Memory

著者: Eric R. Kandel
ナレーター: James Anderson Foster
30日間の無料体験を試す

無料体験終了後は月額¥1,500。いつでも退会できます。

¥ 2,600 で購入

¥ 2,600 で購入

下4桁がのクレジットカードで支払う
ボタンを押すと、Audibleの利用規約およびAmazonのプライバシー規約同意したものとみなされます。支払方法および返品等についてはこちら

あらすじ・解説

Memory binds our mental life together. We are who we are in large part because of what we learn and remember. But how does the brain create memories?

Nobel Prize winner Eric R. Kandel intertwines the intellectual history of the powerful new science of the mind - a combination of cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and molecular biology - with his own personal quest to understand memory.

A deft mixture of memoir and history, modern biology and behavior, In Search of Memory brings listeners from Kandel's childhood in Nazi-occupied Vienna to the forefront of one of the great scientific endeavors of the 20th century: the search for the biological basis of memory.

©2006 Eric R. Kandel (P)2018 Tantor

In Search of Memoryに寄せられたリスナーの声

総合評価
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 星5つ
    0
  • 星4つ
    2
  • 星3つ
    0
  • 星2つ
    0
  • 星1つ
    0
ナレーション
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 星5つ
    1
  • 星4つ
    1
  • 星3つ
    0
  • 星2つ
    0
  • 星1つ
    0
ストーリー
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 星5つ
    0
  • 星4つ
    1
  • 星3つ
    1
  • 星2つ
    0
  • 星1つ
    0

カスタマーレビュー:以下のタブを選択することで、他のサイトのレビューをご覧になれます。

並べ替え:
絞り込み:
  • 総合評価
    4 out of 5 stars
  • ナレーション
    5 out of 5 stars
  • ストーリー
    3 out of 5 stars
jhklcrwijoのプロフィール画像
  • jhklcrwijo
  • 2020/10/16

Suddenly got political

I enjoyed most of the part of this book. It was easy to understand for this difficult topic, and autobiography parts gave me understanding of how this man had lived.

However, the part where he suddenly began talking about the Austrian involvement in Nazis was really irrelevant. I was really surprised when he said he had made a lecture concerning it after he received the Nobel prize. It must have been a real surprise for the audience, who had anticipated a great scientific lecture.

People trust scientists because they think they know facts. However, political matters are not about facts. Surely, you have to distinguish between truths and lies, but mostly, they are about opinions, emotions, decisions, and interests. There are no “absolutely right” or “absolutely wrong”.

I really disappointed that he irrelevantly inserted his political standpoint in the near-final part of this book. I hope naive readers do not confuse with these political opinions and scientific facts. These are quite different problems and should be treated in different contexts.

Most scientists know that they are experts only in their fields. I’m not sure he did.

問題が発生しました。数分後にもう一度お試しください。

ありがとうございました。

あなたはこのレビューを報告しました!