検索キーワード： 認識論

For three hundred years we told ourselves a comforting story about science. Knowledge, we said, grows the way a coral reef grows: patiently, one true fact cemented onto the last, the whole edifice rising steadily toward a complete and final picture of the world. Then in 1962 a soft-spoken physicist who had wandered into history handed us a different story, and the comfortable version never fully recovered.

Emil Cioran wrote for sixty years about the pointlessness of writing, preached suicide, and died at eighty-four. He is quoted more than almost any thinker of the last century and read less than almost any. His admirers treat him as an atmosphere. His detractors treat him as a pose. Both agree, without noticing that they agree, that his sentences are not the sort of thing one checks. This book checks them. Thirty-three of his central claims are stated plainly, given the strongest case that can be made for them, and then tested to see whether they survive. The results satisfy nobody.

The first English-language biography of Henri Bergson, the philosopher who defined individual creativity and transformed twentieth century thought. At the dawn of the twentieth century, Henri Bergson became the most famous philosopher on earth. Where prior thinkers sketched out a predictable...

The human being is the only creature that does not merely live in the world but reads it. We wake into a flood of signs — words, faces, memories, headlines, silences — and we cannot help turning each one into meaning. This is not a hobby of scholars. It is the condition of being human, and it reaches from the way the brain assembles a sunrise to the way a civilization argues about its past.

Somewhere in the popular imagination there lives a tidy little robot called The Scientific Method. It wears a lab coat, it never guesses, it never sulks, and it grinds out truth by turning a logical crank. Paul Feyerabend spent his life arguing that this robot is a fairy tale—and that the real story of how we come to know things is far stranger, far messier, and far more human than anyone wants to admit.

Conquer cognitive bias and modern misinformation by mastering the fascinating science of critical thinking. Perfect for your morning commute, this thought-provoking journey explores how the human mind turns raw, chaotic experience into reliable knowledge. Transform that overwhelmed feeling into...

Master the ultimate questions of existence and ethics in this accessible, global journey through intellectual history. Perfect for an educational morning commute or a reflective evening of deep focus, this engaging narrative transforms complex thought into a vibrant, living conversation...

Dive into a thought-provoking history of ideas to answer our deepest questions about reality, ethics, and human purpose. Perfect for your daily commute or deep focus sessions, this accessible narrative transforms dry theories into a gripping evolution of thought. You will witness how ancient...

A fresh, irreverent, and wildly original take on why philosophy matters and how it has changed the world Why do humans return, again and again, to the "big questions" of philosophy? Why have so many philosophers risked their lives for their vocation? Why have reigning authoritarian rulers been...

A profound argument for science that embraces uncertainty and promotes possibility, creativity, and the belief that we can shape, if not determine, our future. “This wise book challenges everything we take for granted about thinking scientifically.” —Annie Duke, bestselling author of...

This classic work on critical thinking uses a novel approach to teach the basics of informal logic. On the assumption that "it takes one to know one," the authors have written the book from the point of view of someone who wishes to deceive, mislead, or manipulate others. Having mastered the art of deception, listeners will then be able to detect the misuse or abuse of logic when they encounter it in others—whether in a heated political debate or while trying to evaluate the claims of a persuasive sales person.

What if the greatest intellectual weapon ever forged was not a theory, not a proof, but a refusal to believe? In the eighteenth century, a cheerful Scotsman named David Hume dismantled the foundations of human knowledge with nothing more than a sharp eye and an uncomfortable question: How do you actually know what you think you know? Two and a half centuries later, his challenge has not been answered. It has only grown more urgent. The Skeptic’s Armor takes readers on a journey through Hume’s radical skepticism and its astonishing resonance with modern science.

The novelty of the book lies in its reimagining of Kant's philosophy as a dynamic tool of inquiry rather than a fossilized dogma. The author argues that treating Kant's work as a sacred, immutable canon betrays its very essence. Kant's thought was, from the outset, critical—meant to probe the boundaries of reason and to craft methods of knowing, not to hand down definitive answers carved in philosophical stone. The book highlights the central paradox: by turning Kant's ideas into doctrine, one drains them of the very critical energy that Kant himself saw as the lifeblood of philosophy.

In The War Between Mind and Matter: Berkeley and Idealism of Reality, Boris Kriger stages the ultimate philosophical showdown between idealism and materialism—and the results are far less predictable than you might expect. With wit, intellectual rigor, and an irreverent sense of humor, Kriger guides the listener through Berkeley's radical vision of a world made of ideas, pits it against the strongest objections materialism can muster, and reveals why every attempt to refute idealism only proves its point.

In Stop Being Reasonable, philosopher and journalist Eleanor Gordon-Smith tells six lucid, gripping stories that show the limits of human reason. From the woman who realised her husband harboured a terrible secret, to the man who left the cult he had been raised in since birth, and the British...

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel promised to explain everything. The entire universe, all of history, the full trajectory of human consciousness — wrapped up in one tidy system powered by contradictions that magically resolve themselves. It was the most ambitious philosophical project ever attempted, and for nearly two centuries, some of the finest minds in the world have either worshipped it or tried to burn it down.

What makes intelligent, thoughtful people embrace beliefs that seem irrational -- or even dangerous -- to others? In a world growing ever more fractured, understanding the mechanics of belief is no longer a luxury. It's a necessity. Why Sane People Believe Crazy Things is for those who refuse easy answers. Drawing on philosophy, science, and history, you’ll explore the ways our deepest convictions both unite and divide us. Discover: How core assumptions shape societies, values, and every “rational” argument. What makes a belief justified -- and when it’s likely to become toxic.

Try to prove that the world exists without you. Go ahead. Take your time. Every argument you construct, every fact you cite, every scientific instrument you point at reality — all of it happens inside your consciousness. You cannot step outside your own mind to check whether the world is really there. This is not a glitch in human cognition. According to Johann Gottlieb Fichte, it is the fundamental structure of all existence.

Phenomenology has often been hailed as the last sanctuary of European depth—a noble attempt to reclaim the lost transparency of the world. Yet its refined language conceals an irresolvable contradiction: the ambition to describe pure experience in a realm where no purity exists, the wish to perceive the world “as it is” through a consciousness that always arrives too late to itself. Through an exploration of Husserl’s core concepts—intentionality, inner time, epoché, and reduction—the author shows how each strives toward the impossible, while maintaining a haunting poetic precision.

Classical epistemology asked "how does the mind acquire knowledge of the world?" and spent three and a half centuries unable to answer, because the question was badly posed. It presupposed a division between mind and world, between subject and object, between inner representation and outer reality — a division that does not exist in nature.