The Society for Ecological Restoration has released the Third Edition of the International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration, and this episode is less of a book review than a reflection on what these new Standards reveal about our profession.

I explore how ecological restoration has evolved over the past two decades through the lenses of justice, human health and livelihoods, climate readiness, accountability, and communities of practice. I also share why I think the first four principles form the philosophical heart of the new edition, where I'm still wrestling with the Restorative Continuum, and what I hope future editions might look like.

Read more on the Grove & Grit Substack, and here are a few hot takes...

• Ecological restoration has grown from a conversation among ecologists into a global movement involving Indigenous Nations, communities, governments, planners, policymakers, and funders.
• The addition of the word "native" isn't just a definition change - it helps clarify ecological restoration's identity within the much broader ecosystem restoration movement.
• The Third Edition reflects a profession becoming more people-centered, climate-ready, accountable, and connected to public policy.
• Standards don't just describe good practice - they reveal what a profession values, who is participating in the conversation, and where it may be headed next.
• The future of restoration won't be shaped only by better science, but by welcoming new voices, new perspectives, and a variety of knowledge systems.

Read them critically. Celebrate what resonates. Challenge what doesn't. The best standards aren't static documents sitting on a shelf... idling in the nether regions of our computer networks... or chilling five clicks into the SER website. They're invitations into an ongoing conversation.

Society for Ecological Restoration. International Principles and Standards for the Practice of Ecological Restoration (Third Edition)

Gann, G.D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C.R., Hallett, J.G., Guariguata, M.R., Gonzales, E.K., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Eisenberg, C., Liu, J., Decleer, K., Barr, Z.E., Bartholomew, D.C., Best, M., Chazdon, R., Cliquet, A., Cortina-Segarra, J., Kalirai, H., MacCallum, K., Mosyaftiani, A., Pedrini, S., Young, R. and Dixon, K.W. (2026), International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Third edition. Restor Ecol, 34: e70441. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70441

more treehugger podcast episodes

A special thank you to Madrone Grove Adaptation & Restoration for supporting this episode and for advancing climate-ready ecological restoration throughout the Pacific Northwest.

Opening and closing music by: Jessie Villa and The Parrisian

*Spoilers throughout. You've been warned.

Michael went to see The Mandalorian and Grogu as a lifelong Star Wars nerd and Pedro Pascal fan. He left thinking about wetland tipping points, cryosphere feedbacks, and sacrifice zones - which, for this show, tracks. This episode tours four planets as ecological field sites: a remote ice world doing load-bearing planetary work, a deliberately degraded Hutt swamp holding medicine in its margins, a neon urban underworld where ecology persists in the cracks, and a volcanic home in slow, hopeful succession. Along the way we meet characters, like Gatori, the bog-dwelling herbalist who heals Mando after a dragonsnake bite, and Grogu building a mud hut in the Nal Hutta swamp while his dad recovers is the most quietly profound act of restoration in the whole movie.

We also get into who gets to decide what a landscape becomes, why the Outer Rim has always been the sacrifice zone regardless of who's running the Senate, and what the Star Wars universe has been teaching us about ecosystem health, justice, and recovery for fifty years. The hope in this film — like the hope in restoration work — lives not in institutions, but in relationships: between a Mandalorian and his foundling, between a people and their place, between pioneer species and bare rock that is slowly becoming soil.

Star Wars Canon: Where to Learn More

Most of the creature and character detail in this episode comes from Wookieepedia — the fan-maintained Star Wars wiki. If this episode sent you down a Star Wars ecology rabbit hole, that's your next stop.

Planets: Nal Hutta, Nevarro Dagobah Hoth

Characters and Creatures: Din Djarin (Mando) Grogu Yoda Species Gatori Embo Anooba / Marrok Dragonsnake Anzellans / Babu Frik

About the Host

Michael Yadrick is an ecological restoration practitioner, creator of treehugger podcast, co-founder of Arbutus ARME, and a member of the Society for Ecological Restoration. He records on Puyallup Territory in Tacoma, Washington. For consulting work on ecological restoration, climate adaptation, and the intersection of ecosystem health with human health and livelihoods.

Reach Michael through Madrone Grove Adaptation & Restoration LLC at https://www.treehuggerpod.com, Substack and socials. This episode will be expanded in writing on Grove Grit Substack.

Music sourced from the YouTube Audio Library - Blue Deer Studio & Wahneta Meixsell

A couple years after our first conversation on artificial intelligence and ecological restoration, I sat back down with Timothy Pape and Sam Woodrich to ask: what's actually happening now? Their new research looks at how mainstream AI chatbots generate restoration plans across North American ecosystems. The results are familiar; almost too familiar. Plant native species. Remove invasive plants. Repeat. A longer show title might be - Default Prescriptions: AI, Ecology, and the Stories We Repeat.

In this follow-up conversation, I reconnect with Timothy Pape and Sam Woodrich to explore what's changed—and what hasn't. Their recent study examines how AI chatbots generate restoration prescriptions across different ecosystems, and what emerges is a kind of pattern recognition loop: vegetation-first, context-light, and strikingly similar across places that should demand very different approaches.

Woodrich, S. T., & Pape, T. (2024). Ecological restoration and artificial intelligence: Whose values inform a project? Restoration Ecology, 32(4), e14128. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14128

We talk about why that happens, what it says about the knowledge systems AI is trained on, and how these tools may be reinforcing the dominant narratives already present in restoration ecology. Along the way, we get into:

• why AI defaults to "plant natives and remove invasives"
• the absence of social, cultural, and economic context in restoration plans
• the limits of chatbots when it comes to asking deeper questions
• how practitioners are actually using AI in the field (for better and worse)
• the risk of "convincingly shallow" answers
• and the paradox of using resource-intensive technology to plan ecological repair

This episode sits at the intersection of ecology, technology, and values—and asks what happens when we let machines reflect our field back to us.

Timothy Pape
Assistant Professor, Bowling Green State University
Focus: ecological restoration, environmental studies, systems thinking

Sam Woodrich
PhD Candidate, Oregon State University
Focus: predator ecology, riparian systems, restoration science

Interested in restoration strategy, climate adaptation, or ecological storytelling?
Reach out through Madrone Grove Adaptation & Restoration - treehuggerpod@gmail.com

Read more reflections: Grove & Grit (Substack)

Music from this episode is from YouTube Audio Library: True Coockoo, Xander Jones, The Grey Room

Listen to the treehugger lightning songs playlist