エピソード

  • Case by Case | Court of Appeal rules on both validity and infringement without remitting the case to the Local Division

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal rules on both validity and infringement without remitting the case to the Local Division
    2026/03/13

    Fariha Chowdhury looks at the Court of Appeals decision in Rematec GmbH & Co. KG v Europe Forestry B.V., reinstating European patent EP 2 548 648 and overturning the Mannheim LD’s earlier revocation.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    4 分
  • Case by Case | Court of Appeal refuses to stay revocation appeal pending EPO Opposition

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal refuses to stay revocation appeal pending EPO Opposition
    2026/03/13

    Labrador initiated proceedings on 12 June 2024 by filing an infringement action against certain bioMérieux entities before the Düsseldorf LD. In response, bioMérieux UK filed a revocation action before the Milan Central Division (CD) on 30 August 2024, while other entities lodged a counterclaim for revocation within the Düsseldorf infringement proceedings.

    Listen to Fariha Chowdhury detailed analysis.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms no unitary effect without full participating state designation

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal confirms no unitary effect without full participating state designation
    2026/03/06

    On 9 February 2026, the Court of Appeal (CoA) dismissed an appeal from Papst Licensing GmBH & Co. KG (Papst) against a decision of the European Patent Office (EPO) rejecting Papst’s application for unitary effect.

    Olivia Henry explains more in this episode.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分
  • Case by Case | Paris Central Division finds subsidiary is not the “same party” as its parent company and can start separate proceedings

    Case by Case | Paris Central Division finds subsidiary is not the “same party” as its parent company and can start separate proceedings
    2026/03/06

    Milly Wickson takes a look at the decision in which the Paris CD held that ALD France S.A.S. is entitled to bring revocation proceedings against Nanoval’s patent EP 3 083 107 B1, notwithstanding the parallel infringement and revocation actions involving ALD’s German parent company and Nanoval before the Munich LD. Listen now!

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Case by Case | Court of Appeal upholds revoking of Saisie Order and Clarifies Limits on Amended Requests Under r. 222.2 RoP

    Case by Case | Court of Appeal upholds revoking of Saisie Order and Clarifies Limits on Amended Requests Under r. 222.2 RoP
    2026/02/27

    The Court of Appeal (CoA) recently dismissed Centripetal’s appeal against the Mannheim LD’s decision (following a request for review) to revoke an earlier saisie order, on the basis that Centripetal’s request was inadmissible.

    Listen to Maria Ryan in today's episode for more details on the decision.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Case by Case | Paris Local Division Orders Henkel to Disclose Technical Data Sheets in Bostik Infringement Action

    Case by Case | Paris Local Division Orders Henkel to Disclose Technical Data Sheets in Bostik Infringement Action
    2026/02/27

    On 4 February 2026, the Paris LD granted Bostik’s request that Henkel (the alleged infringer) produce evidence under Art. 59 UCPA and r. 190 RoP. The request was for current data sheets for certain of Henkel’s Loctite Liofol branded flexible laminate packaging products.

    Jonathan Ross explains more in this episode.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    2 分
  • Case by case | Court of Appeal clarifies requirements for confidentiality

    Case by case | Court of Appeal clarifies requirements for confidentiality
    2026/02/20

    Luke Norton explores the Court of Appeals decision, handed down on 29 January 2026, addressing confidentiality and r. 262A RoP in the dispute between EOFlow and Insulet.

    Listen now and don't forget to subscribe!

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    1 分
  • Case by case | Hague Local Division grants Abbott Preliminary Injunctions, extending long arm jurisdiction to non-EU countries.

    Case by case | Hague Local Division grants Abbott Preliminary Injunctions, extending long arm jurisdiction to non-EU countries.
    2026/02/20

    On 6 February 2026, The Hague Local Division (LD) granted Abbott provisional injunctions in relation to two of its Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) patents, EP 3 960 072 (the insertion device patent) (EP 072) and EP 2 720 610 (the stacked sensor patent) (EP 610).

    Maria Ryan dives into the details of this case in this episode. Check it out today.

    If you have any feedback, questions, or comments, please email us at upcpodcast@bristows.com.

    Find all the episodes as we release them here. Follow us on LinkedIn.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    3 分