Why Subtraction Isn't Just Taking Away
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
Subtraction isn't always about taking something away. So why do we so often teach it that way?
Before we get into that, check out our free upcoming CPD sessions:
Informal Multiplication: https://www.twinkl.co.uk/l/w7xeg
Practical Techniques to Reduce Cognitive Load in Primary Maths: https://www.twinkl.co.uk/l/ij2cs
In this episode of The Primary Maths Podcast: Aftermaths, Jon and Becky explore the different meanings of subtraction, why children might find it harder than addition, and how we can help pupils become more flexible and confident mathematicians.
From taking away and finding missing parts to comparing quantities, they unpack the three structures of subtraction and explain why understanding the context of a problem matters far more than spotting keywords.
Along the way, they explore the difference between inverse and opposite, discover the history of the minus sign, revisit the shopkeeper's method of counting change, and even find out why computers often use addition to perform subtraction.
In this episode:
- Why subtraction might be harder than addition
- The three structures: reduction, partitioning and comparison
- Why 'more' doesn't always mean add
- The importance of representations and conceptual understanding
- Counting on as an efficient subtraction strategy
- Why choosing the right method matters more than mastering one procedure
- The surprising history of subtraction and its symbols
Because sometimes, the best way to solve a subtraction problem is not to subtract at all.
PlanIt Maths Scheme: https://www.twinkl.co.uk/l/1djqmc
Problem Solving: https://www.twinkl.co.uk/l/65mp5
The Primary Maths Podcast: Aftermaths — with Jon Cripwell and Becky Brown.