Why Some Organizations Recover From a Crisis and Others Never Do
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Why Some Organizations Recover From a Crisis and Others Never Do
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Two organizations fail the same way in the same month. Both apologize within a day, commission a review, and change a policy. One is finished with it in six weeks. The other is still answering for it three years later. Most explanations for that gap point at the response: the speed of the statement, the tone, the chief executive on camera. Those things matter. They are not what separated the two.
In the opening episode of On Repute, Shrita Hernandez makes the case that a crisis never arrives at a blank record. It arrives at an account of the organization that stakeholders have been assembling for years, and the response is read against that account. The episode calibrates the claim, tests it against the research on crisis attribution and violated expectations, and closes with the questions a leadership team can ask before the event rather than after it. Essays and the full season at onrepute.com.