Why Serial Killers Lie After They Are Caught
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Why Serial Killers Lie After They Are Caught
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Capture does not always end a serial killer’s need for control. Sometimes it simply changes the weapon.
After arrest, offenders may deny, minimise, exaggerate, invent victims, withhold locations, trade information for privileges, or reshape themselves into the criminal mastermind they want history to remember. Even a confession can be truthful, manipulative—or both.
In Episode 3 of the GrimSpotting Podcast, we examine why serial killers continue lying after they are caught, using the cases of Ted Bundy, Dennis Rader, Henry Lee Lucas and Samuel Little to explore confession as currency, self-mythology, inflated body counts and the calculated use of uncertainty.
Because when the murders stop, the battle over the story may only be beginning.
The case is not closed.