『Why Public Health Doesn't Need MAHA』のカバーアート

Why Public Health Doesn't Need MAHA

Why Public Health Doesn't Need MAHA

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

A major surgical society has invited a former FDA commissioner to headline its clinical congress, introducing him with a bio that lists the bestsellers and the endowed chairs and mentions none of the pandemic-era claims, the accusations leveled at colleagues, or the circumstances of his departure. The hosts read the introduction in full, then read what it leaves out — and use it to make a broader point: the most dangerous thing happening in medicine right now isn't any single false claim, it's the speed with which discredited records are being smoothed over and their authors welcomed back onto main stages.

From there the conversation turns to a widely shared magazine essay arguing that public health should make common cause with the MAHA movement, and to the Substack defense of that essay written by the hosts of a podcast built around cross-divide conversation. The hosts read both at length and take them apart, drawing a distinction they say the "dialogue" camp collapses: how a physician talks with a vaccine-hesitant patient in an exam room is not the same act as platforming movement leaders who have invoked Nuremberg trials and Holocaust imagery against doctors. One is medicine. The other, they argue, launders danger into an intellectual parlor game.

The episode closes on what is being done to scientists in the meantime — a researcher detained at an airport, a retired NIH scientist taken from his home in handcuffs, an 85-year-old former agency director facing hearings whose stated purpose was imprisonment — and on the quieter counter-story: the people who have left the anti-vaccine movement, and the patient, unglamorous outreach that actually changed their minds.

Topics Include

  • A surgical society's sanitized introduction of a former FDA commissioner — and everything the bio omits

  • The medical-error-as-third-leading-cause-of-death statistic and its origins

  • Why records should still be cited after someone leaves power

  • Headlines: reported White House pressure on HHS over childhood vaccines; new data on flu vaccine effectiveness against pediatric mortality

  • The Atlantic's "Public Health Needs MAHA" essay and the rebuttals from Science-Based Medicine and others

  • "Name one hit" — what MAHA has actually delivered on pesticides, food, and chronic disease

  • Podcasting as an end in itself: the "Why Should I Trust You?" roster and the ethics of platforming

  • Violent rhetoric in the anti-vaccine movement: Nuremberg framing, Holocaust comparisons, and fundraising off both

  • Reactionary centrism and the demand that the people who were right apologize to the people who weren't

  • Public health didn't lose trust — it was politicized

  • Fauci: the noble lie on masks, the decision to take the Fifth, and the campaign against him

  • Scientists detained, arrested, and blamed for origins they had nothing to do with

  • How deconversion actually happens — Vaxopedia, a five-minute conversation with a nurse, and the parents who changed their minds

About the Show

We Want Them Infected is hosted by Dr. Jonathan Howard, a neurologist and psychiatrist in New York City, and Wendy Orent, a science writer specializing in the evolution of infectious disease. The show covers medical misinformation, public health policy, and the people shaping both.

The views expressed are those of the hosts and guests.

adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません