Why 'Disconnect' Doesn't Mean Delete, Failing Safety Grades, and Small Models Beating Giants
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Why 'Disconnect' Doesn't Mean Delete, Failing Safety Grades, and Small Models Beating Giants
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Yesterday in AI | 24 August 2026
Why 'Disconnect' Doesn't Mean Delete, Failing Safety Grades, and Small Models Beating Giants
Artificial intelligence assistants and autonomous models are rapidly asking for the keys to our digital and physical lives, raising the urgent question of who actually holds the controls. This episode breaks down the security findings around "Instinct," a viral personal AI assistant whose disconnect button left complete email archives stored on external servers, and examines the four distinct "delete" settings every user needs to know.
We investigate a new report card from Guidelight AI Standards revealing that the top frontier AI labs earned failing grades for their public kill-switch and containment plans. We look at a landmark class-action lawsuit against Amazon and Twitch over scraping creator videos for AI training, and the fatal loophole in channel opt-outs. We explore London startup Inherent's 27-billion-parameter "Faraday" agent outperforming frontier super-models at reproducing scientific research. We check in on China deploying dozens of autonomous crossing-guard robots on public sidewalks. Finally, we break down Sam Altman's commentary on the AI industry's growing public trust crisis.
Send us Fan Mail
Feedback? Email mike@yesterdayinai.news or connect on LinkedIn, X, or Bluesky. If you like the show, please take a minute to rate and review it so others can find it!