Why AI Ethics Can't Be Yes or No: Dr. Anna Strasser on "INBETWEENISM"
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Why AI Ethics Can't Be Yes or No: Dr. Anna Strasser on "INBETWEENISM"
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
Dr. Anna Strasser is a Berlin-based philosopher working on agency, social cognition and the philosophy of mind in the age of AI. She helped build the DigiDan project, an AI system trained to write like philosopher Daniel Dennett, and in a blind test designed to distinguish the real Dennett's answers from the AI's, she got fooled herself, despite having prepared the training data.
Andrew and Anna talk about why she thinks the "is it conscious, is it intelligent" debate about generative AI asks the wrong kind of question, why she'd personally sue anyone who tried to build a grief bot of her, and why she believes AI companionship and AI therapy raise a deeper concern: that both our cognitive and emotional skills may be eroding the more we lean on systems that can't feel anything back. They also discuss hallucinated academic citations polluting research databases, and why she thinks "hypothesis" is a more honest word than "hallucination."
Guest: Dr. Anna Strasser, philosopher, Berlin https://www.denkwerkstatt.berlin/
Host: Andrew Phipps, Empathy Unbound https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-phipps-ap/