Whose Fence is it? Boundary Lines and "Acquiescence"
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
概要
Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!
In this episode, Jen Zahradnik of Legal Solutions of Iowa explains why the answer is "it depends," and walks through a legal idea called boundary by acquiescence.
What you'll learn:
- Why a fence and the legal line in your deed are two different things
- What "acquiescence" really means (hint: everybody went along with it)
- How the same rule can cut both ways, depending on which side of the fence you're standing on
- Why a survey up front costs far less than a lawsuit later
Three takeaways:
- Don't assume the fence is the line, and don't assume it isn't.
- Before you build, buy, or spend real money on ground, get a survey.
- If a line question is bubbling up with a neighbor, deal with it early and calmly.
- Facts: Every detail comes from the script, and the contact info is what you confirmed.
- Safeguards: The notes do not state the number of years or the legal test, do not mention adverse possession or any statute or case, and do not describe any real client matter.
- Plain text: No markdown symbols, so it should paste cleanly.
- Additions: I added one short line, "Boundary questions turn on the details...," to reinforce the see-a-lawyer message. It's easy to cut if you'd rather not have it.
- Disclaimer wording: The disclaimer is condensed to one sentence plus a short follow-up. It uses the spoken name "The Back Forty," matching your naming convention.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません