Got something to say to this podcast? Send a voicemail, and you might hear yourself on the next episode!

What should your doctor tell you before surgery? What happens when you decline a recommended test? And what if cells taken during your treatment become part of a commercial research project?

In Episode 15 of Dr. Lawyer Breakdown, Dr. Joseph Ramos returns for Part 2 of the conversation on medical consent, examining three landmark cases that helped shape patients’ rights and physicians’ disclosure responsibilities. Through these stories, we explore how questions about treatment, trust, and personal choice became legal battles with lasting consequences.

Cases Discussed:

1. Canterbury v. Spence (1972): A young patient’s spinal surgery and subsequent paralysis raised a defining question: What information would a reasonable patient need before deciding whether to proceed?
2. Truman v. Thomas (1980): A patient declined a recommended Pap smear. The case examined a physician’s responsibility to explain the potential consequences of refusing a test.
3. Moore v. Regents of the University of California (1990): Cells taken during John Moore’s leukemia treatment became the basis for a patented cell line, raising questions about research, financial interests, disclosure, and ownership.

The conversation then turns to genetic testing and AI in healthcare, and the consent questions those technologies raise. Dr. Ramos closes with practical ideas for clearer conversations, including timing, plain language, and asking patients to explain their understanding back.

Start with Episode 14, Part 1, for our discussion of informed consent, surgical risks, emergency treatment, and patient understanding.