Send us Fan Mail

Are we studying Scripture to discover what’s true—or just to defend what we already believe?

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we break down a key issue behind so many theological debates: confirmation bias. Using a real exchange on Bible translations, we look at what happens when someone prioritizes their conclusions over the evidence.

We cover:

• Why “uniformity” in manuscripts is a myth
• Whether modern translations actually remove doctrine
• How presuppositions shape interpretation
• What it really means to seek truth in theology

This one gets a bit more intense than usual—but the question matters.

👇 Jump into the comments:
Do you think most people study to learn—or to defend their position?

👍 Like & subscribe if you enjoy thoughtful, charitable theological discussion.

00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Its Goals

01:11 The Purpose of Studying Scripture

06:12 Exploring Different Theological Perspectives

07:01 The Importance of Challenging Biases

08:31 Debate Analysis: The Blood of Christ

17:06 Uniformity vs. Preservation in Translations

22:35 Misrepresentation in Theological Arguments

27:04 Conclusion: Seeking Truth vs. Defending Biases

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

Do modern Bible translations actually remove references to the blood of Christ?

And what about people who struggle to understand the KJV—don’t we want people to actually read and understand the Bible for themselves?

In this episode, we look at two major audience questions from the KJV Onlyism debate:

1. Should Christians be expected to read a Bible they cannot understand?
2. Are modern translations removing key doctrines by omitting phrases like “through His blood” in Colossians 1:14?

The goal is not just to possess a Bible—but to know God through His Word.

If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation.

00:00 Introduction to Biblical Study

02:03 Understanding Scripture and Its Importance

06:43 The Role of the Holy Spirit in Understanding

17:00 Textual Variants and Their Implications

32:08 The Debate on King James Version vs. Modern Translations

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!

Send us Fan Mail

In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue working through audience questions from the Cravat–Canupp debate, focusing on King James Onlyism and textual criticism.

Can anything good come from Egypt? Should manuscripts be dismissed based on their origin? Did Origen corrupt the text of Scripture? And what exactly is textual criticism anyway?

We take a careful and charitable look at these questions, distinguishing between lower and higher criticism, addressing common misconceptions, and emphasizing why these issues matter for how we understand the Bible today.

My goal is not to attack, but to think clearly and faithfully about Scripture, history, and the tools God has given us to understand His Word.

If you enjoy thoughtful theological discussion, consider liking the video and subscribing.

📌 Let me know your thoughts in the comments:
– Should Egyptian manuscripts be dismissed?
– How do you understand textual criticism?
– Do translation differences affect doctrine?

00:00 Introduction to the Debate and Audience Questions

01:55 Critique of King James-Onlyism

07:36 Understanding Origen and Textual Criticism

14:23 Lower vs Higher Criticism in Textual Studies

24:54 Philosophy and Its Role in Theology

29:11 Examining Scriptural Citations and Errors

Support the show

Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!

Click here to find us everywhere!!