Walsh vs. the System: When Convictions Weren't Enough
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
Walsh vs. the System: When Convictions Weren't Enough
-
ナレーター：
-
著者：
(00:01:17) What Walsh Was Dealing With
(00:02:58) The Immunity Problem
(00:04:43) Poindexter's Rise and Fall
(00:06:16) Reagan's Memory and the Question of the Top
(00:07:30) The Pardons
(00:09:01) What Eight Years Tells Us
December 1986. Lawrence Walsh, a 74-year-old former federal judge, is handed a mandate to prosecute crimes the Reagan White House spent months burying. Documents were already shredded. Witnesses were lawyering up. And the legal traps were already set.
This episode tracks Walsh's eight-year investigation as Independent Counsel — not the televised spectacle of the 1987 Iran-Contra hearings, but what came after. The quiet, grinding legal battle to hold Oliver North, John Poindexter, and others criminally accountable for their roles in the arms-for-hostages scheme and the illegal funding of the Nicaraguan Contras.
Walsh built real cases. A jury convicted North on three felony counts in 1989 — aiding and abetting obstruction of Congress, destroying documents, and accepting an illegal gratuity. Poindexter followed with five felony convictions in 1990. These were serious findings against senior officials who had broken the law.
Then the immunity problem unraveled everything. Congress had granted both men limited immunity to testify publicly in 1987. That decision, made to get their accounts on record, created a legal shield that appellate courts used to vacate both sets of convictions. Not because the facts were wrong. Because the procedural architecture around the prosecution kept collapsing under the weight of what Congress had done first.
The episode examines what the Walsh investigation actually reveals about the limits of legal accountability when the people being investigated control — or have already damaged — the institutions doing the investigating. The Boland Amendment. The Tower Commission. The shredder that jammed. And the question that runs through all of it: can the law hold power to account when power shapes the law?
This episode includes AI-generated content.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません