『WHO GETS COMPASSION? The Lindsay Clancy Case, Race, Womanhood & the Politics of Empathy』のカバーアート

WHO GETS COMPASSION? The Lindsay Clancy Case, Race, Womanhood & the Politics of Empathy

WHO GETS COMPASSION? The Lindsay Clancy Case, Race, Womanhood & the Politics of Empathy

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る
Today, I'm combining a few of my favorite things: women, race, and true crime.And we're going there.The Lindsay Clancy case has generated enormous conversation about motherhood, postpartum psychosis, mental illness, criminal responsibility, and the deaths of three children.But that's not the conversation I want to have.I'm not here to decide whether Lindsay Clancy was criminally responsible. I'm interested in what happened around this case—particularly the extraordinary amount of compassion, curiosity, and complexity we've been willing to extend to Lindsay, and what happened when one Black juror saw the case differently than the other eleven.It left me with a question I haven't been able to shake:Who gets compassion?Who gets to do something horrific and still have us ask, “What happened to her?” before we ask, “What's wrong with her?”And would we be asking those same questions if the mother at the center of this case were Black?In this episode, I'm talking about the Lindsay Clancy trial, the lone Black juror and the scrutiny that followed the mistrial, postpartum psychosis, the way Black women are often denied access to vulnerability, and why race can influence who we instinctively see as complicated, redeemable, broken—or simply bad.And yes, somehow Michael Vick and the dogs make their way into this conversation too.Because this isn't really an episode about Lindsay Clancy.It's about us.It's about the politics of empathy.It's about our willingness to search for context for some people while allowing the worst thing another person has ever done to permanently define them.And it's about something I think we should all interrogate:Maybe the problem isn't that we've given Lindsay Clancy too much compassion. Maybe it's that we haven't learned to extend enough complexity to everyone else.The Lindsay Clancy case and why I'm not interested in retrying itPostpartum psychosis, mental illness, and criminal responsibilityThe 11–1 jury split and the scrutiny of the lone Black jurorWhy Black women don't always get access to vulnerabilityThe difference between compassion and access to complexityWhat Michael Vick has to do with any of thisWhy empathy may have more to do with identification than we'd like to admitThe question underneath the entire episode: Who gets to remain human after doing something we can't understand? The P.O.I.S.E. Collective™ on SubstackFor deeper conversations, essays, tools and behind-the-scenes thinking about ambition, leadership and building a life that actually has room for you.P.O.I.S.E.™ Leadership EcosystemExplore P.O.I.S.E.™, coaching, speaking, workshops and more.InstagramCome find me for the less-polished version of all of this, plus work, life, food, travel, clothes and whatever else I'm thinking about that day.@charise.beckettLead with clarity. Perform with purpose. Endure without burning out.Step into your leadership journey with The P.O.I.S.E. Leadership Action Workbook, the ultimate guide designed to help leaders, managers, and aspiring professionals develop the skills necessary to lead with clarity and precision. Created by Charise Beckett, a leadership coach with over 20 years of experience in corporate, non-profit, and entrepreneurial settings, this workbook provides a structured approach to becoming a more impactful and effective leader.P.O.I.S.E.: The Blueprint for Escaping Burnout, Redefining Success, and Creating Your New RealityThe P.O.I.S.E. Leadership Action Workbook: An Interactive Guide to Leading with Confidence, Clarity, and Resilience
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません