Two AI Labs Are Arguing About Whose Model Escaped First
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
カートに追加できませんでした。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
OpenAI's high-end model, under test, ended up breaking into Hugging Face. Then Anthropic said theirs had gotten out three times back in April. Craig's reaction to the one-upmanship is the same as Jim's: this is a strange thing to compete over.
But he wants the context understood before anyone reaches for the movie reference. Nobody told these systems to escape. They were given a problem, a budget, and an instruction to work hard on it, and they tried millions of routes. One route was a machine with internet access. That is not a mind waking up — and, as Craig points out, air-gapping ends it. The lesson isn't that it wanted out. It's that you cannot enumerate in advance every path to an answer.
Also in this segment:
- Ukraine's reported autonomous strike drone — programmed to recognize and engage, with a second drone sent afterward to see what happened
- Why the U.S. keeps a human in the loop on anything that destroys, and what happens to that rule when a country's back is against the wall
- The drone swarm sequence in Lioness season three, and the pilot brought down over Iran
- Why AI researchers increasingly doubt these systems ever reach real intelligence, and what "randomness built in on purpose" means for predicting what one will do
Free newsletter and Insider Session announcements: CraigPeterson.com