『Trial by Social Media: Lindsay Clancy, the McDonald’s Coffee Case & What the Public Misses』のカバーアート

Trial by Social Media: Lindsay Clancy, the McDonald’s Coffee Case & What the Public Misses

Trial by Social Media: Lindsay Clancy, the McDonald’s Coffee Case & What the Public Misses

無料で聴く

ポッドキャストの詳細を見る

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
In this episode of Off the Record, Paul Adam and Colin Gerstner examine how high-profile court cases can take on a very different life once they move from the courtroom to television, social media, and public commentary. Using the Lindsay Clancy murder trial and the famous McDonald's hot coffee case as examples, they discuss the gap between the evidence jurors actually hear and the short clips, headlines, and narratives the public often sees. The conversation covers the burden of proof in criminal cases, hung juries and mistrials, motions in limine, mental-health defenses, compensatory and punitive damages, and comparative negligence. Paul and Colin also revisit the facts behind Stella Liebeck's McDonald's lawsuit, including the severity of her burns and the jury's finding that she shared some responsibility for the accident. Their larger point is that a viral clip or simplified headline rarely captures the legal issues, admissible evidence, and hours of testimony that shape an actual trial—and that understanding the legal process requires more than reacting to the most shareable moment.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません