『The True Crime Report with Jim Rathmann』のカバーアート

The True Crime Report with Jim Rathmann

The True Crime Report with Jim Rathmann

著者： Hi Hello Labs Network
無料で聴く

【Amazonプライム会員限定】今ならプレミアムプランが4か月 月額99円。

10月19日まで。※適用条件あり
Welcome to The True Crime Report with Jim Rathmann—where Bronze Star recipient, 82nd Airborne Division Captain, and former Secret Service agent Jim Rathmann takes a deep dive into some of the most complex and controversial true cases in America. A veteran of the police force and an experienced homicide investigator, Jim brings the same relentless dedication to his investigations that he did while serving as an Infantry Platoon Leader in Kandahar, Afghanistan, and as a decorated LSU athlete.Copyright Hi Hello Labs Network ノンフィクション犯罪
エピソード
  • Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: What Happens Next?

    Lindsay Clancy Mistrial: What Happens Next?
    2026/09/23
    Lindsay Clancy Mistrial Explained: What Happens Next in the Retrial?

    Following the mistrial in the Lindsay Clancy case, former investigator Jim Rathmann is taking a deeper look at the questions surrounding the trial, the reported jury split, postpartum psychosis, criminal responsibility, and what could happen when the case returns to court.

    In this listener Q&A episode of The True Crime Report, Jim is joined by producer Carlos Flores to answer some of the biggest questions submitted after their initial Lindsay Clancy case breakdown.

    Why couldn't the jury reach a unanimous verdict? What does a mistrial mean for the prosecution and defense? Could evidence of planning coexist with severe mental illness or psychosis? What behaviors can investigators examine when considering consciousness of guilt? And are there unanswered questions surrounding the timeline that deserve further investigation?

    Jim discusses the prosecution's burden of proof, the defense's potential strategy, the alleged timeline surrounding the deaths of Clancy's three children, questions surrounding her mental state, and the distinction between postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis.

    This episode also explores one of the central questions surrounding the Lindsay Clancy case: Can someone appear organized or calculated while experiencing psychosis? Jim examines that question from an investigative perspective while discussing how mental state, alleged premeditation, physical evidence, timelines, and behavior can affect a homicide investigation.

    Later, Jim explains why he believes certain timeline details raise unanswered questions and discusses what investigators typically examine when reconstructing the events before and after a homicide.

    Finally, Jim and Carlos discuss the important distinction between postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis and why understanding that difference matters when examining this case.

    Topics include:
    • Lindsay Clancy case
    • Lindsay Clancy mistrial
    • Lindsay Clancy retrial, hung jury
    • postpartum psychosis
    • postpartum depression
    • criminal responsibility
    • insanity defense
    • homicide investigation
    • consciousness of guilt
    • premeditation
    • prosecution strategy
    • defense strategy
    • true crime investigation
    • and unanswered questions in the Lindsay Clancy case.
    This episode includes discussion of the deaths of children, suicide, mental illness, and other sensitive subjects. Commentary and opinions expressed during the episode should not be interpreted as findings of fact or determinations of guilt.


    -----------------------------------------------------


    Subscribe for more deep dives into cybercrime, investigations, and real-world threats.
    Comment below: What’s the biggest online safety concern you have for your family right now?



    Disclaimer: The content discussed in this episode contains descriptions of child exploitation, grooming, self-harm, and suicide. Listener discretion is strongly advised. The information shared is for educational and awareness purposes only and should not be considered legal or professional advice.

    If you or someone you know is in immediate danger, contact local law enforcement or the appropriate authorities right away.

    Stay tuned for more episodes to come.

    Follow Jim on Instagram: @therealjimrathmann

    -----------------------------------------------------

    Special thanks to our sponsor: Hi Hello Labs in Orlando, Florida, for powering and producing this show.

    Sponsored by: Hi Hello Labs (Orlando, FL)
    Produced at: Hi Hello Labs



    続きを読む 一部表示
    31 分
  • Lindsay Clancy Case: The Evidence That Doesn’t Add Up

    Lindsay Clancy Case: The Evidence That Doesn’t Add Up
    2026/09/13
    The Lindsay Clancy case is one of the most tragic and complicated true crime cases in recent years. In this episode of The True Crime Report, former investigator Jim Rathmann breaks down the Lindsay Clancy case from an investigative perspective and examines the unanswered questions he believes remain surrounding the deaths of her three children.

    Jim explores the reported timeline surrounding the deaths, Lindsay Clancy’s mental health treatment, postpartum psychosis, medications she had been prescribed, her suicide attempt, digital evidence, reported internet searches, Patrick Clancy’s movements that evening, and other details Jim believes investigators should examine closely.

    Rather than assuming one theory explains everything, Jim approaches the case as he would a crime scene: test the timeline, examine the physical and digital evidence, investigate everyone involved, and determine which facts can actually be independently supported.

    Among the questions discussed:
    • What role could postpartum psychosis or medication have played in Lindsay Clancy’s mental state?
    • Does the reported timeline make sense when compared with the physical evidence?
    • What can Lindsay Clancy’s reported core body temperature tell investigators?
    • Are there digital and timeline discrepancies that deserve additional examination?
    • Was every possible scenario investigated thoroughly enough?
    • What evidence would be necessary to establish what happened beyond a reasonable doubt?

    Jim also explains why investigators cannot begin with a predetermined conclusion. In a case involving three murdered children, every relevant timeline, witness statement, digital record, medical finding, and piece of physical evidence deserves scrutiny.

    This episode contains Jim Rathmann’s analysis, questions, and theories based on information discussed in the case. Allegations and theories discussed should not be understood as established findings of fact.

    Subscribe to The True Crime Report with Jim Rathmann for more true crime investigations, criminal case analysis, cold cases, investigative breakdowns, and updates on the Lindsay Clancy case.
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Subscribe for more deep dives into cybercrime, investigations, and real-world threats.

    Comment below: What’s the biggest online safety concern you have for your family right now?

    Disclaimer: The content discussed in this episode contains descriptions of child exploitation, grooming, self-harm, and suicide. Listener discretion is strongly advised. The information shared is for educational and awareness purposes only and should not be considered legal or professional advice. If you or someone you know is in immediate danger, contact local law enforcement or the appropriate authorities right away.

    Stay tuned for more episodes to come., where Jim will wrap up reveal the case.

    Follow Jim on Instagram: @therealjimrathmann
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Special thanks to our partners: Hi Hello Labs in Orlando, Florida, for powering and producing this show.
    Sponsored by: Hi Hello Labs (Orlando, FL)
    Produced at: Hi Hello Labs (Orlando, FL)
    続きを読む 一部表示
    23 分
  • Eric Naposki: The DNA Questions Still Unanswered

    Eric Naposki: The DNA Questions Still Unanswered
    2026/06/26
    Eric Naposki Case: Missing Evidence, Witness Testimony & DNA Questions Did key evidence in the Bill McLaughlin murder investigation disappear? And why is DNA testing still being delayed decades after the crime? In this episode of The True Crime Report, Jim Rathmann examines the controversial case involving former NFL player Eric Naposki and Nanette Packard Johnston, who were convicted in connection with the 1994 murder of wealthy Newport Beach businessman Bill McLaughlin. ----------------------------------------------------- Follow Jim on Instagram: @therealjimrathmann ----------------------------------------------------- Special thanks to our partners: Podgo and Hi Hello Labs in Orlando, Florida, for powering and producing this show. Sponsored by: Podgo Services Produced at: Hi Hello Labs (Orlando, FL) Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See https://pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
    続きを読む 一部表示
    37 分
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません