The Pentagram in the Courtroom: How the Trial Became a Symbol
カートのアイテムが多すぎます
ご購入は五十タイトルがカートに入っている場合のみです。
カートに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ウィッシュリストに追加できませんでした。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ほしい物リストの削除に失敗しました。
しばらく経ってから再度お試しください。
ポッドキャストのフォローに失敗しました
ポッドキャストのフォロー解除に失敗しました
-
ナレーター:
-
著者:
This episode examines what happened inside the trial after East LA residents dragged Ramirez off a stolen car in August 1985 and held him until police arrived. The prosecution's case looked formidable: multiple survivor identifications, a fingerprint from a connected vehicle, and the weight of a traumatised city behind every witness. But running through the case like a structural fault line was the Avia 445b shoe print — partial impressions matched by a criminalist named Gerald Burke who had no specialised training in footwear impression analysis. His testimony landed confident, specific, and essentially unchallenged, because the defence never retained a competing expert and never pressed Burke on his methodology or qualifications.
Forensic specialist Lisa DiMeo later reviewed the same evidence and reached a starkly different conclusion: the partial prints were insufficient to identify any specific shoe model. That gap — between what the jury heard and what the evidence could actually support — is exactly the kind of gap capital cases are supposed to close before a death sentence is handed down.
The episode also explores the Netflix Night Stalker documentary's misidentification of the shoe model, and what it reveals about how thoroughly atmosphere displaced precision in the retelling of this case. Ramirez was sentenced to death in 1989. He died on death row in 2013, aged fifty, from cancer. The forensic questions he left behind are still worth asking.
This episode includes AI-generated content.
adbl_web_anon_alc_button_suppression_t1
まだレビューはありません